References
1a
Enders D.
Reinhold U.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1997,
8:
1895
1b
Bloch R.
Chem. Rev.
1998,
98:
1407
1c
Adams JP.
Box DS.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1999,
749
2
Gante J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1994,
33:
1699
3a
Wirth T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1997,
36:
225
3b
Cativiela C.
Díaz de Villegas MD.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1998,
9:
3517
3c
Cativiela C.
Díaz de Villegas MD.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2000,
11:
645
For a general review on this class of compounds, see:
4a
Ottenheijm HCJ.
Herscheid JDM.
Chem. Rev.
1986,
86:
697
4b See also: Kolasa T.
Sharma SK.
Miller MJ.
Tetrahedron
1988,
44:
5431
4c
Jin Y.
Kim DH.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1997,
8:
3699
4d
Merino P.
Castillo E.
Franco S.
Merchán SL.
Tejero T.
J. Org. Chem.
1998,
63:
2371
4e
N -Hydroxy amino acids have been found as components of depsipeptide antibiotics: Lorca M.
Kurosu M.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2001,
2431
4f Another N-hydroxy compound which displays useful pharmacological properties is the 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor Zileuton: Brooks DW.
Bell RL.
Carter GW.
Dube LM.
Rubin PD.
Drugs Future
1993,
18:
616
5a
Marco JA.
Carda M.
Murga J.
Rodríguez S.
Falomir E.
Oliva M.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1998,
9:
1679
5b
Carda M.
Murga J.
Rodríguez S.
González F.
Castillo E.
Marco JA.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1998,
9:
1703
6a
Marco JA.
Carda M.
González F.
Rodríguez S.
Murga J.
Liebigs Ann. Chem.
1996,
1801
6b
Carda M.
Rodríguez S.
Murga J.
Falomir E.
Marco JA.
Röper H.
Synth. Commun.
1999,
29:
2601
7a
Torssell KBG.
Nitrile Oxides, Nitrones and Nitronates in Organic Synthesis
VCH;
:
1988.
7b
Confalone PN.
Huie EM.
Org. React.
1988,
36:
1
7c
Enders D.
Reinhold U.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1997,
8:
1895
8a
Marco JA.
Carda M.
Murga J.
Portolés R.
Falomir E.
Lex J.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1998,
3237
8b 1,3-Dipolar cycloadditions of this nitrone have also been investigated: Carda M.
Portolés R.
Murga J.
Uriel S.
Marco JA.
Domingo LR.
Zaragozá RJ.
Röper H.
J. Org. Chem.
2000,
65:
7000
9 The oximes 1 were obtained as E /Z mixtures, from which only the E isomers showed a good stereoselectivity. Moreover, nitrone 2 was obtained together with a structurally close dioxazine, which was, however, unreactive towards organometallics.
10 A distinct NOE was detected between the N-benzylic hydrogens and the methylene protons of the CH2 OTPS group.
11 We have studied the formation of the nitrone with the aid of quantum-mechanical ab initio methods. The non-isolated E nitrone was found to be more stable than the Z isomer by more than 3 kcal/mol. This indicates that the formation of the Z nitrone is subjected to kinetic control. Preliminary results of studies on possible transition states suggest that that leading to the isolated Z nitrone is lower in energy than the alternative transition state leading to the E isomer (unpublished results with S. Safont).
12
Preparation of Nitrone 3 . 1-O -t -butyldiphenylsilyl-3,4-O -isopropylidene-l -erythrulose
[6 ]
(19.93 g, 50 mmol) and N -benzyl hydroxylamine (6.16 g, 50 mmol) were dissolved in CH2 Cl2 (150 mL). Anhyd MgSO4 (10 g) was added to the mixture and the suspension was stirred under Ar for 48 h at r.t. The reaction mixture was then filtered through Celite, and the Celite pad was subsequently washed twice with CH2 Cl2 (2 × 30 mL). After complete solvent removal in vacuo, the oily residue was chromatographed on silica gel (hexanes-EtOAc, 7:3). This furnished nitrone 3 as a dense oil (19.65 g, 78%), which could not be induced to crystallize: [α]D
25 -20.6 (CHCl3 , c 3.7). IR νmax (film): 3052, 2986, 2934, 2892, 2860, 1577, 1472, 1455, 1428, 1382, 1266, 1212, 1181, 1154, 1112, 1058, 738, 704 cm-1 . HRMS (EI): m/z (rel. int.) = 503.2504 (0.5) [M+ ], 488(10) [M+ - Me], 446(16) [M+ - t -Bu], 388(45), 341(88), 199(100), 101(96). Calcd for C30 H37 NO4 Si, M = 503.2492. 1 H NMR (CDCl3 , 500 MHz): δ = 7.80-7.20 (15 H, m), 5.27 (1 H, t, J = 7 Hz), 5.06 (2 H, AB system, J = 11 Hz), 4.53 (1 H, dd, J = 8.5 and 7 Hz), 4.46 (2 H, AB system, J = 12.5 Hz), 3.77 (1 H, dd, J = 8.5 and 7 Hz), 1.35 (3 H, s), 1.29 (3 H, s), 1.10 (9 H, s). 13 C NMR (CDCl3 , 125 MHz): d = 148.1, 133.2, 132.3, 132.2, 109.7, 19.3 (C), 135.7, 135.6, 135.5, 130.0, 129.1, 128.8, 128.6, 128.5, 128.3, 128.2, 127.8, 127.7, 73.2 (CH), 68.3, 64.5, 56.3 (CH2 ), 27.0, 26.0, 24.7 (CH3 ).
13
General Reaction Conditions for Grignard Additions to Nitrone 3 with Aqueous Work-up . A solution of 3 (1 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was cooled under Ar to -78 °C and treated with the appropriate Grignard reagent (5 mmol of a commercial solution in THF). After stirring for 5 h at the same temperature, the reaction mixture was quenched with sat. aq NH4 Cl (2 mL); the reaction mixture was stirred for further 5 min, poured into brine and extracted with EtOAc. The organic layers were then dried on anhyd Na2 SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. Column chromatography of the oily residue on silica gel (hexane-EtOAc mixtures) afforded the corresponding adducts (Table). Additions in the presence of Lewis acid additives were performed in the same way except that the Lewis acid (1 mmol) was added to an ice-cooled solution of 3 ; the solution was then stirred for 15 min and cooled to -78 °C, prior to addition of the Grignard reagent.
Grignard Additions to Nitrone 3 with acetylating Work-up . For the preparation of amino acid derivatives, the reaction was performed as above except that acetic anhydride (190 µL, 2 mmol) was added dropwise at -78 °C to the reaction mixture. The cooling bath was removed and the mixture was stirred for 30 min at r.t. After quenching with sat. aq NH4 Cl (2 mL), the reaction mixture was stirred for further 15 min, poured into brine and worked up as above. The configuration of the newly formed stereogenic center was determined by straightforward conversion of adducts 4 into oxazolidinones i (Scheme
[5 ]
) and observation of suitable NOE’s in the latter. Additional support was given by X-ray diffraction analyses of 4 (R = Et), 4 (R = allyl) and 6 (R = Ph). The crystallographic data of these three com-pounds have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallo-graphic Data Centre (deposition numbers, CCDC-177985 to CCDC-177987).
Scheme 5
See, for example:
14a
Chang Z.-Y.
Coates RM.
J. Org. Chem.
1990,
55:
3464
14b
Dondoni A.
Franco S.
Merchán SL.
Merino P.
Tejero T.
Synlett
1993,
78
14c
Basha A.
Henry R.
McLaughlin MA.
Ratajczyk JD.
Wittenberger SJ.
J. Org. Chem.
1994,
59:
6103
14d
Dondoni A.
Franco S.
Junquera F.
Merchán FL.
Merino P.
Tejero T.
Bertolasi V.
Chem.-Eur. J.
1995,
1:
505
14e
Merino P.
Lanaspa A.
Merchán FL.
Tejero T.
J. Org. Chem.
1996,
61:
9028
14f
Dhavale DD.
Desai VN.
Sindkhedkar MD.
Mali RS.
Castellari C.
Trombini C.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1997,
8:
1475
15a
Marco JA.
Carda M.
González F.
Rodríguez S.
Castillo E.
Murga J.
J. Org. Chem.
1998,
63:
698
15b
Carda M.
Castillo E.
Rodríguez S.
González F.
Marco JA.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2001,
12:
1417
16
Oppolzer W. In
Comprehensive Organic Synthesis
Vol. 5:
Trost BM.
Fleming I.
Paquette LA.
Pergamon Press;
Oxford:
1991.
Chap. 1.2.
17a
Evans DA.
Allison BD.
Yang MG.
Masse CE.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001,
123:
10840
17b The strong chelating ability of Me2 AlCl is attributed to a bimolecular interchange where the anion (Me2 AlCl2 )- is formed together with formal transfer of the chelating, highly Lewis acidic species Me2 Al+ to the substrate. Obviously, two equivalents of Me2 AlCl are required.