Local Excision of Small Distal Rectal Cancers

ABSTRACT

Radical resections for rectal cancer have been associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. The original Miles resection had a perioperative mortality of 40%.[1] Rosen et al. reported a 61% incidence of postoperative complications following abdominoperineal resections (APRs).[2] Others have reported a 50% urinary complication rate and a high perineal wound infection rate (16%).[3] Disadvantages of the APR also include psychological and quality-of-life issues primarily related to the permanent colostomy. When Williams and Johnston[4] surveyed patients for their satisfaction after receiving an APR, they found that 66% of patients had significant leaks from their stoma appliances, 67% complained of sexual dysfunction, and only 40% of those patients working preoperatively returned to work. There was also a significant change in body image compared with sphincter-saving procedures. Because of the significant problems associated with a radical resection for rectal cancer, local therapies have been used for selected patients over the years to adequately treat the rectal cancer but avoid the morbidity, mortality, and quality-of-life changes. These treatments include local excisions via the transanal, transcoccygeal, or transphincteric route; fulgaration of low-lying tumors with cautery; and intracavitary radiation. Local excision has been the approach most often used and is discussed in detail. The other techniques (fulgaration, intracavitary radiation) are rarely used but do have a very limited role in selected cases.

KEYWORDS

Small distal rectal cancers - transanal excision - transcoccygeal resection

REFERENCES

• 1 Miles W E. A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and the terminal portion of the pelvic colon.  Lancet . 1908;  2 1812-1813
• 2 Rosen L, Veidenheimer M C, Coller J A, Corman M L. Mortality, morbidity and patterns of recurrence after abdominoperineal resection for cancer of the rectum.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1994;  25 202-206
• 3 Pollard C W, Nivatvongs S, Rojanasakul A, Ilstrup D M. Carcinoma of the rectum: profiles of intraoperative and early postoperative complications.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1982;  25 866-874
• 4 Williams N S, Johnston D. The quality of life after rectal excision for low rectal cancer.  Br J Surg . 1983;  70 460-462
• 5 Morson B C, Bussey H RJ, Samoorian S. Policy of local excision for early cancer of the colorectum.  Gut . 1977;  18 1945-1050
• 6 Breen E, Bleday R. Preservation of the anus in the therapy of distal rectal cancers.  Surg Clin North Am . 1997;  77 71-83
• 7 Saclarides T J, Bhattacharyya A K, Britton-Kuzel C, Szeluga D, Economou S G. Predicting lymph node metastases in rectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1994;  37 52-57
• 8 Muto T, Sawada T, Sugihara K. Treatment of carcinoma in adenomas.  World J Surg . 1991;  15 35-40
• 9 Bleday R, Breen E, Jessup J M, Burgess A, Sentovich S M, Steele Jr D G. Prospective evaluation of local excision for small rectal cancers.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1997;  40 388-392
• 10 Ota D M, Skibber J, Rich T A. MD Anderson cancer center experience with local excision and multimodality therapy for rectal cancer.  Surg Oncol Clin N Am . 1992;  1 147-152
• 11 Steele Jr D G, Herndon J E, Bleday R. Sphincter sparing treatment for distal rectal adenocarcinoma.  Ann Surg Oncol . 1999;  6 433-441