References
1 For review, see: Ritter K.
Synthesis
1993,
735
2a
Yasuda N.
Xavier L.
Rieger DL.
Li Y.
DeCamp AE.
Dolling U.-H.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1993,
34:
3211
2b
Nicolaou KC.
Sato M.
Miller ND.
Gunzner JL.
Renaud J.
Untersteller E.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1996,
35:
889
2c
Sasaki M.
Fuwa H.
Inoue M.
Tachibana K.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1998,
39:
9027
For Heck coupling of enol nonaflate, see:
3a
Bräse S.
de Meijere A.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
1995,
34:
2545
3b
Webel M.
Reissig H.-U.
Synlett
1997,
1141
3c
Bräse S.
Synlett
1999,
1654
For Stille, Suzuki and Sonogashira couplings of aryl nonaflate, see:
4a
Rottläbder M.
Knochel P.
J. Org. Chem.
1998,
63:
203
4b
Stoltz BM.
Kano T.
Corey EJ.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000,
122:
9044
4c
Bellina F.
Ciucci D.
Vergamini P.
Rossi R.
Tetrahedron
2000,
56:
2533
5a
Wada A.
Nomoto Y.
Tano K.
Yamashita E.
Ito M.
Chem. Pharm. Bull.
2000,
48:
1391
5b
Wada A.
Fukunaga K.
Ito M.
Synlett
2001,
800
5c
Wada A.
Babu G.
Shimomoto S.
Ito M.
Synlett
2001,
1751
6
Engler TA.
Sampath U.
Naganathan S.
Velde DV.
Takuasgawa F.
J. Org. Chem.
1989,
54:
5712
7
Subramanian LR.
Bentz H.
Hanack M.
Synthesis
1973,
293
8
1H NMR data of enol nonaflate 2a are as follows: (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.97 (6 H, s, Me × 2), 1.42-1.50 (2 H, m, CH2), 1.56-1.62 (2 H, m, CH2), 1.68 (3 H, s), 2.02 (2 H, t, J = 7 Hz), 6.21 (1 H, d, J = 12 Hz, =CH), 6.46 (1 H, d, J = 16 Hz, =CH).
9
Farina V.
Krishnan B.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1991,
113:
9585
10
Typical coupling procedure: To a stirred solution of enol nonaflate (2a, 1 mmol),(vinyl)tributylstannane (4, 1.5 mmol), and AsPh3 (20 mol%, 60 mg) in DMF (2 mL) was added Pd2dba3-CHCl3 adduct (2.5 mol%, 26 mg) all at once under nitrogen. After stirring for an indicated period in Table
[1]
, the reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution (3 mL) and extracted with diethyl ether (10 mL × 3). The extracts were washed with saturated aqueous NaCl solution (10 mL) and then dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the coupled product 5.
5a: IR (CHCl3) cm-1: 3610, 3446, 2969, 1647; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 1.00 (6 H, s, Me × 2), 1.40-1.46 (2 H, m, CH2), 1.56-1.62 (3 H, m, CH2 and OH), 1.69 (3 H, s, Me), 2.02 (2 H, t, J = 7 Hz, CH2), 4.19 (2 H, t, J = 7 Hz, CH2), 5.78 (1 H, dt, J = 15, 6 Hz, =CH), 6.03 (1 H, dd, J = 16, 10 Hz, =CH), 6.14 (1 H, d, J = 16 Hz, =CH), 6.31 (1 H, ddt, J = 15, 10, 1 Hz, =CH); HRMS (EI) C14H22O: requires 206.1669, found 206.1667.
11 In the case of trisubstituted olefins 5d and 5e, its stereo-chemistry was determined after conversion to the corresponding aldehyde by oxidation, respectively. See: Wada A.
Hiraishi S.
Takamura N.
Date T.
Aoe K.
Ito M.
J. Org. Chem.
1997,
62:
4343
12
Typical coupling procedure: To a stirred solution of enol nonaflate (2a, 0.5 mmol), acetylene (6, 1 mmol), diisopropylamine (2 mmol, 200 mg), and CuI (15 mol%, 35 mg) in benzene (3 mL) was added Pd(PPh3)4 (10 mol%, 58 mg) all at once under nitrogen. After stirring for an indicated period in Table
[2]
, the reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution (3 mL) and extracted with ether (10 mL × 3). The extracts were washed with saturated aqueous NaCl solution (10 mL) and then dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by column chromatography on a silica gel to produce the coupled product 7.
7a: IR (CHCl3) cm-1: 3608, 3450, 2932, 2209, 1604; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 1.00 (6 H, s, Me × 2), 1.40-1.47 (2 H, m, CH2), 1.56-1.61 (3 H, m, CH2 and OH), 1.70 (3 H, s, Me), 1.99 (2 H, t, J = 6 Hz, CH2), 4.41 (2 H, d, J = 4 Hz, CH2), 5.47 (1 H, dt, J = 16.5, 2 Hz, =CH), 6.59 (1 H, d, J = 16 Hz, =CH); HRMS (EI) C14H20O: requires 204.1513, found 204.1520.
13 In the case of 13C-labeled aldehyde 1, there was no reappearance of the peak for the conversion to the corresponding enol triflate. On the contrary, there was no trouble in preparation of the enol nonaflate.