Penetration Failure and Misdiagnosis of Stereotactic Biopsy Caused by the Uncommonly Firm Tissue of a Gliomyosarcoma

Abstract

Objective and Importance: We report the very rare case of a gliomyosarcoma that caused penetration failure in stereotactic biopsy and therefore led to misdiagnosis. This complication should be considered as a potential reason for diagnostic failure with uncommonly firm tumors in frame-based stereotactic biopsy.

Clinical Presentation: An 83-year-old women presented with a 4-week history of right hemiparesis. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a left precentral lesion of 1 cm in diameter with moderate contrast uptake and perifocal edema.

Intervention: Stereotactic biopsy was performed using the Cosman-Robert-Wells (CRW) system and a side-aspirating biopsy needle. Six tissue samples were taken; however, histopathologic examination remained non-diagnostic. Because the hemiparesis had worsened, a magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) was taken four weeks later and clearly demonstrated an increase in size of the lesion. Neuronavigation-guided open surgery revealed a very firm, well-delimited tumor that was classified in the pathologic examination as a gliomyosarcoma. Repeated recalculations of the target coordinates, analysis of the CT scan that was taken 4 days after the stereotaxy, and finally, recognition of the extraordinary firmness of this gliomyosarcoma allowed us to presume with certainty that we had not penetrated the lesion with the biopsy cannula, but rather had merely pushed it ahead of the instrument while the tissue samples were taken. Conclusion: The reported case is both unique for its histopathologic diagnosis and for the complication it caused in stereotactic biopsy. The case also supports the implementation of image-guided interventions for diagnostic biopsy, rather than frame-based stereotaxy in the future.

Brain Neoplasm - Diagnostic Failure - Frame-Based Stereotactic Biopsy - Gliomyosarcoma

References

• 1 Alesch F, Armbruster C, Budka H. Diagnostic value of stereotactic biopsy of cerebral lesions in patients with AIDS.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995;  134 214-219
• 2 Chandrasoma P T, Smith M M, Apuzzo M L. Stereotactic biopsy in the diagnosis of brain masses: comparison of results of biopsy and resected surgical specimen.  Neurosurgery. 1989;  24 160-165
• 3 Hall W A. The safety and efficacy of stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions.  Cancer. 1998;  82 1749-1755
• 4 Kleihues P, Volk B, Anagnostopoulos J, Kiessling M. Morphologic evaluation of stereotactic brain tumour biopsies.  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1984;  33 171-181
• 5 Colombo F, Casentini L, Zanusso M, Danieli D, Benedetti A. Validity of stereotactic biopsy as a diagnostic tool.  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1988;  42 152-156
• 6 Grant J W, Steart P V, Aguzzi A, Jones D B, Gallagher P J. Gliosarcoma: an immunhistochemical study.  Acta Neuropathol. 1989;  79 305-309
• 7 Meis J M, Martz K L, Nelson J S. Mixed glioblastoma multiforme and sarcoma: A clinicopathologic study of 26 radiation therapy oncology group cases.  Cancer. 1991;  67 2342-2349
• 8 Morantz R A, Feigin I, Ransohoff III J. Clinical and pathological study of 24 cases of gliosarcoma.  J Neurosurg. 1976;  45 398-408
• 9 Schiffer D, Giordona M T. Immunologic cell markers. In: Berger MS, Wilson CB (eds): The Gliomas. Chapter 18. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company 1999: 192-203
• 10 VandenBerg S R, Lopes M BS. Classification. In: Berger MS, Wilson CB (eds): The Gliomas. Chapter 17. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company 1999: 172-191
• 11 Barnard R O, Bradford R, Scott T, Thomas D G. Gliomyosarcoma. Report of a case of rhabdomyosarcoma arising in a malignant glioma.  Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1986;  69 23-27
• 12 Goldman R L. Gliomyosarcoma of the cerebrum. Report of a unique case.  Am J Clin Pathol. 1969;  52 741-744
• 13 Marucci G, Hadjmohammadi N, Cenni P, Ragazzini T, Eusebi V. Malignant glial tumor with skeletal muscle differentiation. Description of a case. (Article in Italian).  Pathologica. 2000;  92 198-203
• 14 Sarkar C, Sharma M C, Sudha K, Gaikwad S, Varma A. A clinico-pathological study of 29 cases of gliosarcoma with special reference to two unique variants.  Indian J Med Res. 1997;  106 229-235
• 15 Stapleton S R, Harkness W, Willkins P R, Uttley D. Gliomyosarcoma: an immunhistochemical analysis.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;  55 728-730
• 16 Grunert P, Maurer J, Muller-Forell W. Accuracy of stereotactic coordinate transformation using a localisation frame and computed tomographic imaging. Part I. Influence of the mathematical and physical properties of the CT on the image of the rods of the localisation frame and the determination of their centres.  Neurosurg Rev. 1999;  22 173-187
• 17 Grunert P. Accuracy of stereotactic coordinate transformation using a localisation frame and computed tomographic imaging. Part II. Analysis of matrix-based coordinate transformation.  Neurosurg Rev. 1999;  22 188-204
• 18 Kitchen N D, Lemieux L, Thomas D G. Accuracy in frame-based and frameless stereotaxy.  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1993;  61 195-206
• 19 Maciunas R J, Galloway Jr R L, Latimer J W. The application accuracy of stereotactic frames.  Neurosurgery. 1995;  35 682-694
• 20 Turgut M, Tavus N. Vertical displacement of stereotaxic target in the cat brain after burr hole production of the skull.  Res Exp Med (Berl). 1998;  198 157-166
• 21 Black P M, Moriarty T, Alexander III E, Stieg P, Woodard E J, Gleason P L, Martin C H, Kikinis R, Schwartz R B, Jolesz F A. Development and implementation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and its neurosurgical applications.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  41 831-845
• 22 Hall W A, Liu H, Martin A J, Pozza C H, Maxwell R E, Truwit C L. Safety, efficiacy and functionality of high-field strength interventional magnetic resonance imaging for neurosurgery.  Neurosurgery. 2000;  46 632-642
• 23 Moriarty T M, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Larson P S, Alexander III E, Gleason P L, Schwartz R B, Jolesz F A, Black P M. Frameless stereotactic neurosurgery using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: stereotactic brain biopsy.  Neurosurgery. 2000;  47 1138-1146
• 24 Rubino G J, Farahani K, McGill D, Van de Wiele B, Villablanca J P, Wang-Mathieson A. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided neurosurgery in the magnetic fringe fields: the next step in neuronavigation.  Neurosurgery. 2000;  46 643-654
• 25 Tronnier V M, Wirtz C R, Knauth M, Lenz G, Pastyr O, Bonsanto M M, Albert F K, Kuth R, Staubert A, Schlegel W, Sartor K, Kunze S. Intraoperative diagnostic and interventional magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  40 891-902