Download PDF
Semin Hear 2002; 23(4): 357-364
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-35884
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Treatment and Evaluation Indices of Auditory Processing Disorders

Hanna Putter-Katz, Limor Adi-Ben Said, Irit Feldman, Dana Miran, Dana Kushnir, Chava Muchnik, Minka Hildesheimer
  • Speech and Hearing Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel, and Department of Communication Disorders, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 December 2002 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Listening skills were compared before and after a structured intervention program for a group of 20 children with auditory processing disorders (APD). Comparisons of pre- and post- management measures indicated a significant increase in speech recognition performance in degraded listening conditions (background noise and competing speech). The APD management approach was integrative and included top-down and bottom-up strategies. These findings add to a growing body of literature suggesting that interactive auditory training can improve communication skills.

KEYWORDS

Auditory processing disorder - auditory learning - management - degraded listening conditions

REFERENCES

  • 1 Jerger J, Musiek F E. Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children.  J Am Acad Audiol . 2000;  11 467-474
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Moore D, Hogan S C, Kacelnik O. Auditory learning as a cause and treatment of central dysfunction.  Audiol Neurootol . 2001;  6 216-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chermak G D. Central testing. In: Gerber SE, ed. The Handbook of Pediatric Audiology Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press 1996: 206-253
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Ferre J, Willber L. Normal and learning disabled children's central auditory processing skills: an experimental test battery.  Ear Hear . 1986;  7 336-343
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Musiek F E. Habilitation and management of auditory processing disorders: overview of selected procedures.  J Am Acad Audiol . 1999;  10 329-342
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bellis T J, Ferre J M. Multidimensional Approach to the differential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorders in children.  J Am Acad Audiol . 1999;  10 319-328
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Garstecki D, Hutton C L, Nerbonne M A, Newman C W, Smoski W J. Case study examples using self-assessment.  Ear Hear . 1990;  11(Suppl) 48S-56S
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jirsa R E. The clinical utility of the P3 AERP in children with auditory processing disorders.  J Speech Hear Res . 1992;  35 903-912
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Yencer K A. The effects of auditory integration training for children with central auditory processing disorders.  Am J Audiol . 1998;  7 32-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hesse G, Netling M, Mohrmann B, Laubert A, Ptok M. Intensive inpatient therapy of auditory processing and perceptual disorders in childhood.  HNO . 2001;  49 636-641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kraus N. Auditory pathway encoding and neural plasticity in children with learning problems.  Audiol Neurootol . 2001;  6 221-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bellis T J. Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting: From Science to Practice.  San Diego, CA: Singular 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Welsh L W, Welsh J J, Healy M P. Learning disabilities and central auditory dysfunction.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol . 1996;  105 117-122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Chermak G D, Musiek F E. Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspectives.  San Diego, CA: Singular 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Cunningham J, Nicol T, Zecker S G, Kraus N. Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement.  Clin Neurophysiol . 2001;  112 758-767
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Eisenberg L S, Shannon R V, Martinez A S, Wygonski J, Boothroyd A. Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age.  J Acoust Soc Am . 2000;  107 2704-2710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 ANSI. ANSI s3.6-1996, ``Specifications for Audiometers''. New York: American National Standards Institute; 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 18 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Task Force on Central Auditory Processing Consensus Development.Central auditory processing: current status of research and implications for clinical practice.  Am J Audiol . 1996;  5 41-54
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Willeford J A, Burleigh J M. Sentence procedures in central auditory testing. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 4th ed Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins 1994: 259-268
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Musiek F E. Central auditory tests.  Scand Audiol . 1999;  28(Suppl.51) 33-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Katz J, Stecker N, Henderson D. Central Auditory Processing: A Transdisciplinary View .  St Louis, MO: Mosby 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Schneider D. Audiologic management of central auditory processing disorders. In: Katz J, Stecker N, Henderson D, eds. Central Auditory Processing: A Transdisciplinary View St Louis, MO: Mosby 1992: 161-168
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Young M L, Protti-Patterson E. Management perspectives of central auditory problems in children: top-down and bottom-up considerations.  Semin Hear . 1984;  5 251-261
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Pisoni D B, Aslin R N, Perey A J, Hennessy B L. Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants.  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform . 1982;  8 297-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chermak G D. Handbook of Audiological Rehabilitation.  Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas 1981
    Google Scholar