Skull Base 2003; 13(1): 043-050
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-37552
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Comparison of Different Computer-Aided Surgery Systems in Skull Base Surgery

U. Ecke1 , B. Luebben1 , J. Maurer1 , S. Boor2 , W. J. Mann1
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Mainz University Medical School, Mainz, Germany
  • 2Department of Neuroradiology, Mainz University Medical School, Mainz, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 March 2003 (online)

Preview

ABSTRACT

Computer-aided surgery (CAS) based on high-resolution imaging techniques represents an important adjunct to precise intraoperative orientation when anatomical landmarks are distorted or missing. Several commercial systems, mostly based on optical or electromagnetic navigation principles, are on the market. This study investigated the application of EasyGuide;rM, VectorVision;rM, and InstaTrak;rM CAS systems in ENT surgery under practical and laboratory conditions. System accuracy, time required, handling, individual features, and practicality were examined in 155 patients who underwent endonasal sinus surgery and in 23 patients who underwent anterior or lateral skull base procedures. The VectorVision;rM and InstaTrak;rM CAS systems proved to be suitable for routine application in surgery involving the paranasal sinuses and various regions of the anterior skull base by helping to avoid critical structures and to determine minimally invasive approaches.

REFERENCES