PDF herunterladen
Aktuelle Neurologie 2003; 30(5): 209-214
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-39961
Neues in der Neurologie
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Neue Therapien in der Neurorehabilitation

New Therapies in NeurorehabilitationJ.  Liepert1
  • 1Neurologische Klinik, Universitätskliniken Eppendorf, Hamburg
Herrn Prof. Dr. C. Weiller danke ich für die kritische Durchsicht des Manuskriptes
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
12. Juni 2003 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Schlaganfallpatienten sind auch Jahre nach dem Ereignis in hohem Prozentsatz in ihrer motorischen Funktion beeinträchtigt. Neben den seit Jahrzehnten bekannten physiotherapeutischen Verfahren wurden in den letzten Jahren verschiedene neue Ansätze entwickelt. Diese Übersicht stellt insbesondere den forcierten Gebrauch, das bilaterale Armtraining, roboterunterstützte Therapien, afferenzenassoziiertes Training und den Einsatz von Pharmaka zur Optimierung der motorischen Rehabilitation vor.

Abstract

Even years after a stroke a large number of patients still suffer from motor impairment. In recent years some new motor rehabilitation techniques have emerged. This review focusses on forced use treatments, bilateral arm training, robot-assisted sensorimotor therapies, modulations of afferent input and drugs that might promote motor rehabilitation.

Literatur

  • 1 Dijkerman H C, Wood V A, Hewer R L. Long-term outcome after discharge from a stroke rehabilitation unit.  J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1996;  30 538-546
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Broeks J G, Lankhorst G J, Rumping K, Prevo A J. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study.  Disabil Rehabil. 1999;  21 357-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP (ed) Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical applications. New York, NY; Williams & Wilkins 1980: 371-401
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Bauder H, Taub E, Miltner W HR. Behandlung motorischer Störungen nach Schlaganfall. Die Taubsche Bewegungsinduktionstherapie. Göttingen, Bern, Toronto, Seattle; Hogrefe Verlag 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Ostendorf C G, Wolf S L. Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function: a single-case design.  Phys Ther. 1981;  61 1022-1028
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wolf S L, Lecraw D E, Barton L A, Jann B B. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients.  Exper Neurol. 1989;  104 125-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Taub E, Crago J E, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation.  Rehabil Psychol. 1998;  43 152-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Taub E, Miller N E, Novack T A. et al . Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;  74 347-354
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - a clinical review.  J Rehabil Res. 1999;  36 237-251
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Van der Lee J H, Wagenaar R C, Langhorst G J. et al . Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients.  Stroke. 1999;  30 2369-2375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kunkel A, Kopp B, Müller G. et al . Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;  80 624-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Miltner W HR, Bauder H, Sommer M. et al . Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke.  Stroke. 1999;  30 586-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Blanton S, Wolf S L. An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke.  Phys Ther. 1999;  79 847-853
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Peter C, Leidner O. Forced use therapy in the rehabilitation of hemiparetic patients - a modification for clinical practise.  Neurol Rehabil. 1997;  3 137-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Dromerick A W, Edwards D F, Hahn M. Does application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke?.  Stroke. 2000;  31 2984-2988
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Liepert J, Miltner W HR, Bauder H. et al . Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients.  Neurosci Lett. 1998;  250 5-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner W HR. et al . Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans.  Stroke. 2000;  31 1210-1216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner W HR. et al . Therapie-induzierte kortikale Reorganisation bei Schlaganfallpatienten.  Neurol Rehabil. 2000;  6 177-183
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Liepert J, Uhde I, Gräf S. et al . Motor cortex plasticity during forced use therapy in stroke patients.  J Neurol. 2001;  248 315-321
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Levy C E, Nichols D S, Schmalbrock P M. et al . Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy.  Am J Phy Med Rehabil. 2001;  80 4-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nelles G, Jentzen W, Jueptner M. et al . Arm training induced brain plasticity in stroke studied with serial positron emission tomography.  Neuroimage. 2001;  13 1146-1154
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Whitall J, Waller S, Silver K, Macko R. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke.  Stroke. 2000;  31 2390-2395
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Mudie M H, Matyas T A. Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damaged by stroke?.  Disabil Rehabil. 2000;  22 23-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mudie M H, Matyas T A. Responses of the densely hemiplegic upper extremity to bilateral training.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2001;  15 129-140
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Cauraugh J H, Kim S. Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements.  Stroke. 2002;  33 1589-1594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Platz T, Bock S, Prass K. Reduced skillfulness of arm motor behaviour among motor stroke patients with good clinical recovery: does it indicate reduced automaticity? Can it be improved by unilateral or bilateral training? A kinematic motion analysis study.  Neuropsychologia. 2001;  39 687-698
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Staines W R, McIlroy W E, Graham S J, Black S E. Bilateral movement enhances ipsilesional cortical activity in acute stroke: a pilot functional MRI study.  Neurology. 2001;  56 401-404
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Andersen B, Rosler K M, Lauritzen M. Nonspecific facilitation of responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation.  Muscle Nerve. 1999;  22 857-863
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Stinear C M, Walker K S, Byblow W D. Symmetric facilitation between motor cortices during contraction of ipsilateral hand muscles.  Exp Brain Res. 2001;  139 101-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Aisen M L, Krebs H I, Hogan N. et al . The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke.  Arch Neurol. 1997;  54 443-446
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Volpe B T, Krebs H I, Hogan N. et al . Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years.  Neurology. 1999;  53 1874-1876
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Volpe B T, Krebs H I, Hogan N. et al . A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation.  Neurology. 2000;  54 1938-1944
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Lum P S, Burgar C G, Shor P C. et al . Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;  83 952-959
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Rose L, Bakal D A, Fung T S. et al . Tactile extinction and functional status after stroke. A preliminary investigation.  Stroke. 1994;  25 1973-1976
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Reding M, Potes E. Rehabilitation outcome following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke. Life table analysis approach.  Stroke. 1988;  19 1354-1358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Rood M S. Neurophysiological mechanisms utilized in treatment of neuromuscular dysfunction.  Am J Occup Ther. 1956;  10 220-224
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Dannenbaum R M, Dykes R W. Sensory loss in the hand after sensory stroke: therapeutic rationale.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;  69 833-839
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Carey L M, Matyas T A, Oke L E. Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;  74 602-611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Yekutiel M, Guttman E. A controlled trial of the retraining of the sensory function of the hand in stroke patients.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;  56 241-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Dimitrijevic M M, Stokic D S, Wawro A W, Wun C C. Modification of motor control of wrist extension by mesh-glove electrical afferent stimulation in stroke patients.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;  77 252-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Conforto A B, Kaelin-Lang A, Cohen L G. Increase in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation.  Ann Neurol. 2002;  51 122-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Ridding M C, Brouwer B, Miles T S. et al . Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects.  Exp Brain Res. 2000;  131 135-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Kaelin-Lang A, Luft A R, Sawaki L. et al . Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input.  J Physiol. 2002;  540 623-633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Heldmann B, Kerkhoff G, Struppler A. et al . Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation alleviates tactile extinction.  Neuroreport. 2000;  11 3193-3198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Müllbacher W, Richards C, Ziemann U. et al . Improving hand function in chronic stroke.  Arch Neurol. 2002;  59 1278-1282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Ziemann U, Hallett M, Cohen L G. Mechanisms of deafferentation-induced plasticity in human motor cortex.  J Neurosci. 1998;  18 7000-7007
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Goldstein L B. Common drugs may influence motor recovery after stroke.  Neurology. 1995;  45 865-871
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Crisostomo E A, Duncan P W, Probst M. et al . Evidence that amphetamine with physical therapy promotes recovery of motor function in stroke patients.  Ann Neurol. 1988;  23 94-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Walker-Batson D W, Smith P, Curtis S. et al . Amphetamine paired with physical therapy accelerates motor recovery after stroke.  Stroke. 1995;  26 2254-2259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Grade C, Redford B, Chrostowski J. et al . Methylphenidate in early poststroke recovery: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;  79 1047-1050
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Gainotti G, Antonucci G, Marra C, Paolucci S. Relation between depression after stroke, antidepressant therapy, and functional recovery.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;  71 258-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Scheidtmann K, Fries W, Muller F, Koenig E. Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke: a perspective, randomized, double-blind study.  Lancet. 2001;  358 787-790
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Dam M, Tonin P, De Boni A. et al . Effects of fluoxetine and maprotiline on functional recovery in poststroke hemiplegic patients undergoing rehabilitation therapy.  Stroke. 1996;  27 1211-1214
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Pariente J, Loubinoux I, Carel C. et al . Fluoxetine modulates motor performance and cerebral activation of patients recovering from stroke.  Ann Neurol. 2001;  50 718-729
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Van Kuijk A A, Geurts A C, Bevaart B J, van Limbeek J. Treatment of upper extremity spasticity in stroke patients by focal neuronal or neuromuscular blockade: a systematic review of the literature.  J Rehabil Med. 2002;  34 51-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Panizza M, Castagna M, di Summa A. et al . Functional and clinical changes in upper limb spastic patients treated with botulinum toxin (BTX).  Funct Neurol. 2000;  15 147-155
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Pandyan A D, Vuadens P, van Wijck F M. et al . Are we underestimating the clinical efficacy of botulinum toxin (type A)?.  Clin Rehabil. 2002;  16 654-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Rousseaux M, Kozlowski O, Froger J. Efficacy of botulinum toxin A in upper limb function of hemiplegic patients.  J Neurol. 2002;  249 76-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Brashear A, Gordon M F, Elovic E. et al . Botox Post-Stroke Spasticity Study Group. Intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of wrist and finger spasticity after a stroke.  N Engl J Med. 2002;  347 395-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Bakheit A M, Pittock S, Moore A P. et al . A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in upperlimb spasticity in patients with stroke.  Eur J Neurol. 2001;  8 558-565
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

PD Dr. J. Liepert

Neurologische Klinik · UKE

Martinistraße 52

20246 Hamburg

eMail: liepert@uke.uni-hamburg.de

      >