Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-43038
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Adjuvante Chemotherapie beim primären Mammakarzinom
State of the art nach St. Gallen 2003Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary Carcinoma of the BreastState of the art beyond St. Gallen 2003Publication History
Publication Date:
21 October 2003 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Die St.-Gallen-Konsensuskonferenz 2003 zur Therapie des primären Mammakarzinoms bestätigte die Bedeutung der adjuvanten Chemotherapie. Bei hormonrezeptor-negativen Tumoren gilt Chemotherapie unabhängig von Alter oder Lymphknotenstatus als adjuvante Standardbehandlung. Bei hormonrezeptor-positiven Tumoren spielt Chemotherapie zusätzlich zur endokrinen Therapie eine wichtige Rolle. Die Frage, welche Patientin eine kombinierte chemoendokrine Therapie benötigt, und für wen die reine endokrine Therapie genügt, ist noch nicht ausreichend beantwortet. Anthrazykline gelten als Standard-Chemotherapie. Eine Überlegenheit gegenüber CMF konnte bisher nur für anthrazyklinhaltige Polychemotherapien mit mindestens drei Substanzen gezeigt werden. Aktuelle Daten zeigen, dass durch den Einsatz von Taxanen zusätzlich zu anthrazyklinhaltigen Schemata eine signifikante Verbesserung des Überlebens erreicht werden kann. Bei nodal-positiven, hormonrezeptor-negativen Tumoren stellen Taxane aufgrund der publizierten Daten eine Therapieoption dar, ihr optimaler Einsatz in verschiedenen Risikokollektiven wird derzeit in Studien geprüft. Generell sollte die adjuvante Chemotherapie vor einer eventuellen Bestrahlung abgeschlossen sein und eine eventuelle endokrine Therapie sequenziell durchgeführt werden.
Angesichts des internationalen St.-Gallen-Konsensuspanels kann in der endgültigen Publikation nur ein Minimalkonsens erwartet werden. Die einzelnen Länder sind aufgerufen, diese Empfehlungen evidenzbasiert an nationale Gegebenheiten anzupassen. Für Deutschland finden sich aktuelle, evidenzbasierte Therapieempfehlungen in der Leitlinie der AGO Organkommission „Mamma”. Eine S3-Leitlinie „Mammakarzinom” unter Mitwirkung aller beteiligten Fachgesellschaften wird derzeit fertig gestellt.
Abstract
The 2003 St. Gallen consensus on primary therapy of early breast cancer confirmed the importance of adjuvant chemotherapy. In endocrine non-responsive tumors, chemotherapy is adjuvant treatment of choice, independent of patient age or lymph node status. In endocrine-responsive disease, chemotherapy plays an important role next to endocrine treatment. The questions, which patients need combined chemo-endocrine therapy, and for whom endocrine therapy alone is sufficient, are still unsolved. Anthracyclines are standard adjuvant chemotherapy; superiority over CMF has only been shown for anthracyclin-containing polychemotherapy with at least 3 substances. Recent published evidence suggest that adding taxanes to anthracyclin regimens may benefit patient survival and that taxanes are a valid therapeutic option in node-positive, hormone receptor negative breast cancer. The optimal use of taxanes in different risk collectives is currently being investigated in clinical trials. Generally, adjuvant chemotherapy should be administered before radiotherapy, and endocrine therapy should be given sequentially. In view of the international St. Gallen panel, the final publication may only represent a minimal consensus. Individual countries are requested to adapt these recommendations to national conditions. In Germany, up-to-date evidence-based therapy recommendations have just been issued by the AGO “breast” expert panel. Interdisciplinary S3 breast cancer guidelines are currently being finalized.
Schlüsselwörter
Adjuvante Chemotherapie - AGO - Mammakarzinom - St. Gallen - Taxane - uPA/PAI-1
Key words
Adjuvant chemotherapy - AGO - breast cancer - St. Gallen - uPA/PAI-1 - taxanes
Literatur
- 1 Aebi S, Gelber S, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gelber R D, Collins J, Thurlimann B, Rudenstam C M, Lindtner J, Crivellari D, Cortes-Funes H, Simoncini E, Werner I D, Coates A S, Goldhirsch A. Is chemotherapy alone adequate for young women with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer?. Lancet. 2000; 355 1869-1874
-
2 AGO-Organkommission „Mamma” .Leitlinien 2003 für die Behandlung des primären und des metastasierten Mammakarzinoms. www.ago-online.de
- 3 Albain K S, Green S J, Ravdin P M, Cobau C D, Levine E G, Ingle J N, Pritchard K I, Schneider D J, Abeloff M D, Norton L, Henderson I C, Lew D, Livingston R B, Martino S, Osborne C K. Adjuvant chemohormonal therapy for primary breast cancer should be sequential instead of concurrent: initial results from intergroup trial 0100 (SWOG-8814). Proc ASCO. 2002; 21 143
- 4 Buzdar A U, Singletary S E, Valero V, Booser D J, Ibrahim N K, Rahman Z, Theriault R L, Walters R, Rivera E, Smith T L, Holmes F A, Hoy E, Frye D K, Manuel N, Kau S W, McNeese M D, Strom E, Thomas E, Hunt K, Ames F, Berry D, Hortobagyi G N. Evaluation of paclitaxel in adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with operable breast cancer: preliminary data of a prospective randomized trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2002; 8 1073-1079
- 5 Citron M L, Berry D A, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer E P, Gradishar W J, Davidson N E, Martino S, Livingston R, Ingle J N, Perez E A, Carpenter J, Hurd D, Holland J F, Smith B L, Sartor C I, Leung E H, Abrams J, Schilsky R L, Muss H B, Norton L. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21 1431-1439
-
6 EBCTCG .Adjuvant treatment of breast cancer - 2000 metaanalysis. Konferenzunterlagen Oxford 2000
- 7 Fisher B, Brown A M, Dimitrov N V, Poisson R, Redmond C, Margolese R G, Bowman D, Wolmark N, Wickerham D L, Kardinal C G. et al . Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-15. J Clin Oncol. 1990; 8 1483-1496
- 8 French Adjuvant Study Group . Benefit of a high-dose epirubicin regimen in adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients with poor prognostic factors: 5-year follow-up results of French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19 602-611
- 9 Goldhirsch A, Glick J H, Gelber R D, Coates A S, Senn H J. Meeting Highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19 3817-3827
- 10 Harbeck N, Meisner C, Prechtl A, Untch M, Selbmann H K, Sweep C GJ, Graeff H, Schmitt M, Jänicke F, Thomssen C. Level-I evidence for prognostic and predictive impact of uPA and PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer provided by second scheduled analysis of multicenter Chemo-N0 therapy trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001; 69 213
- 11 Harbeck N, Kates R E, Look M P, Meijer-van Gelder M E, Klijn J GM, Jänicke F, Krüger A, Kiechle M, Schmitt M, Foekens J A. Enhanced benefit from adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in breast cancer patients classified high-risk according to uPA and PAI-1 (n = 3 424). Cancer Res. 2002; 62 4617-4622
- 12 Harbeck N, Schmitt M, Kates R E, Kiechle M, Zemzoum I, Jänicke F, Thomssen C. Clinical utility of uPA/PAI-1 determination in primary breast cancer tissue for individualized therapy concepts. Clin Breast Cancer. 2002; 3 196-200
- 13 Henderson I C, Berry D A, Demetri G D, Cirrincione C T, Goldstein L J, Martino S, Ingle J N, Cooper M R, Hayes D F, Tkaczuk K H, Fleming G, Holland J F, Duggan D B, Carpenter J T, Frei E, Schilsky R L, Wood W C, Muss H B, Norton L. Improved outcomes from adding sequential Paclitaxel but not from escalating Doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21 976-983
- 14 Heys S D, Hutcheon A W, Sarkar T K, Ogston K N, Miller I D, Payne S, Smith I, Walker L G, Eremin O. Aberdeen Breast Group . Neoadjuvant docetaxel in breast cancer: 3-year survival results from the Aberdeen trial. Clin Breast Cancer. 2002; 3 (Suppl 2) 69-74
- 15 Jänicke F, Prechtl A, Thomssen C, Harbeck N, Meisner C, Untch M, Sweep C G, Selbmann H K, Graeff H, Schmitt M. for the German Chemo N 0 Study Group . Randomized adjuvant therapy trial in high-risk lymph node-negative breast cancer patients identified by urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type I. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93 913-920
- 16 Kroman N, Jensen M B, Wohlfahrt J, Mouridsen H T, Andersen P K, Melbye M. Factors influencing the effect of age on prognosis in breast cancer: population based study. Br Med Journal. 2000; 320 474-478
- 17 Levine M N, Bramwell V H, Pritchard K I, Norris B D, Shepherd L E, Abu-Zahra H, Findlay B, Warr D, Bowman D, Myles J, Arnold A, Vandenberg T, MacKenzie R, Robert J, Ottaway J, Burnell M, Williams C K, Tu D. Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol. 1998; 16 2651-2658
- 18 Look M P, van Putten W LJ, Duffy M J, Harbeck N, Brünner N, Kates R, Fernö M, Eppenberger S, Spyratos F, Thomssen C, Sweep C GJ, Peyrat J P, Martin P M, Blankenstein M A, Magdelenat H, Quillien-Pouvreau V, Daver A, Ricolleau G, Daxenbichler G, Cufer T, Bendahl P O, Lisboa B, Ulm K, Christensen I J, Meijer-van Gelder M E, Fiets E, Manders P, Broët P, Romain S, Windbichler G, Borstnar S, Beex L VRM, Jänicke F, Klijn J GM, Eppenberger U, Schmitt M, Foekens J A. Pooled analysis of prognostic impact of uPA and PAI-1 in 8 377 breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94 116-128
- 19 Muss H B, Thor A D, Berry D A, Kute T, Liu E T, Koerner F, Cirrincione C T, Budman D R, Wood W C, Barcos M. et al . c-erbB-2 expression and response to adjuvant therapy in women with node-positive early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330 1260-1266
- 20 Nabholtz J M, Pienkowski T, Mackey J, Pawlicki M, Guastalla J P, Vogel C, Weaver C, Walley B, Martin M, Chap L, Tomiak E, Juhos E, Guevin R, Howell A, Hainsworth J, Fornander T, Blitz S, Gazel S, Loret C, Riva A.. Breast Cancer Intl Research Group . Phase III trial comparing TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) with FAC (5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) in the adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer (BC) patients: interim analysis of the BCIRG 001 study. Proc ASCO. 2002; 21 141
- 21 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel . National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001; 30 5-15
- 22 NSABP . The effect on primary tumor response of adding sequential Taxotere to Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from NSABP protocol B-27. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001; 69 210
- 23 Piccart M J, Di Leo A, Beauduin M, Vindevoghel A, Michel J, Focan C, Tagnon A, Ries F, Gobert P, Finet C, Closon-Dejardin M T, Dufrane J P, Kerger J, Liebens F, Beauvois S, Bartholomeus S, Dolci S, Lobelle J P, Paesmans M, Nogaret J M. Phase III trial comparing two dose levels of epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19 3103-3110
-
24 Tumorzentrum München .Manual Mammakarzinom. 9. Auflage. http://www.med.uni-muenchen.de/TZMuenchen/manuale.htm. 2003
-
25 von Minckwitz G. Für die AGO- Organkommission „Mamma”. State of the Art Meeting Gravenbruch 2002: Aktuelle Empfehlungen zur Therapie primärer und fortgeschrittener Mammakarzinome. W. Zuckschwerdt GmbH, München 2002
Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Nadia Harbeck
Oberärztin der Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar
Technische Universität München
Ismaninger Straße 22
D-81675 München
Phone: 0 89/41 40-24 19
Fax: 0 89/41 40-48 46
Email: nadia.harbeck@lrz.tum.de