Prevalence and Significance of Periduodenal Venous Collaterals in Patients Evaluated for Pancreaticobiliary Disorders by Endosonography

Background and Study Aims: The prevalence of periduodenal venous collaterals detected by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in patients undergoing evaluation for pancreaticobiliary disorders, and their influence on the success of transduodenal fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of solid pancreatic masses is not known.
Patients and Methods: Records for all consecutive patients who underwent EUS for pancreaticobiliary disorders over a 14-month period were reviewed. EUS was carried out by a single endosonographer using a radial echo endoscope. When FNA was attempted, a curvilinear-array echo endoscope was used in conjunction with color flow Doppler. Periduodenal and perigastric collaterals were defined as multiple anechoic serpiginous structures imaged from the duodenal bulb, the second portion of duodenum, or the stomach. Established criteria were used to assess the presence of chronic pancreatitis.
Results: Over the study period, 338 patients (mean age 58.9 ± 14.5 years; 52 % women) underwent EUS for pancreaticobiliary disorders. Periduodenal collaterals were detected in 22 patients (6.5 %), 21 of whom (19 %) had pancreatic cancer. Patients with pancreatic cancer were significantly more likely to have periduodenal collaterals in comparison with those without pancreatic cancer (OR 25; 95 %CI, 5.75 - 109; P = 0.001). Computed tomography detected collaterals in only two of the 22 patients (9.1 %). Periduodenal collaterals made transduodenal FNA impossible in nine of the 22 patients (41 %). However, in these patients a cancer diagnosis was obtained using EUS-FNA from liver lesions in two cases; using a transgastric approach in two (pancreatic neck lesions); and atypical cells were obtained in two. A safe window could not be achieved in three patients (13.6 %). Transduodenal FNA was performed by avoiding the collaterals and was successful in 13 of the 22 patients, with no bleeding complications.
Conclusions: Periduodenal collateral vessels are infrequent in patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary disease, but are relatively common in patients with pancreatic cancer. Transduodenal EUS-FNA can be carried out safely in the majority of cases in the presence of periduodenal collaterals, but collaterals may occasionally hamper successful transduodenal pancreatic FNA.

References

• 1 Legmann P, Vignaux O, Dousset B. et al . Pancreatic tumors: comparison of dual-phase helical CT and endoscopic sonography.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;  170 1315-1322
• 2 Mertz H R, Sechopoulos P, Delbeke D. et al . EUS, PET, and CT scanning for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 367-371
• 3 Powis M E, Chang K J. Endoscopic ultrasound in the clinical staging and management of pancreatic cancer: its impact on cost of treatment.  Cancer Control. 2000;  7 413-420
• 4 Rösch T, Lightdale C J, Botet J F. et al . Localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography.  N Engl J Med. 1992;  326 1721-1726
• 5 Rösch T, Braig C, Gain T. et al . Staging of pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography: comparison with conventional sonography, computed tomography, and angiography.  Gastroenterology. 1992;  102 188-199
• 6 Williams D B, Sahai A V, Aabakken L. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience.  Gut. 1999;  44 720-726
• 7 Choudhuri G, Dhiman R K, Agarwal D K. Endosonographic evaluation of the venous anatomy around the gastro-esophageal junction in patients with portal hypertension.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1996;  43 1250-1255
• 8 Faigel D O, Rosen H R, Sasaki A. et al . EUS in cirrhotic patients with and without prior variceal hemorrhage in comparison with noncirrhotic control subjects.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 455-462
• 9 Irisawa A, Obara K, Sato Y. et al . EUS analysis of collateral veins inside and outside the esophageal wall in portal hypertension.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 374-380
• 10 Sahai A V, Zimmerman M, Aabakken L. et al . Prospective assessment of the ability of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose, exclude, or establish the severity of chronic pancreatitis found by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 18-25
• 11 Salama Z A, Kassem A M, Giovannini M. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonographic study of the azygos vein in patients with varices.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 748-750
• 12 Snady H, Bruckner H, Siegel J. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonographic criteria of vascular invasion by potentially resectable pancreatic tumors.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 326-333
• 13 DeMay R M. Pancreas. In: DeMay, RM The art and science of cytopathology. Chicago; ASCP Press 1996: 1053-1082
• 14 Fritscher-Ravens A, Izbicki J R, Sriram P V. et al . Endosonography-guided, fine-needle aspiration cytology extending the indication for organ-preserving pancreatic surgery.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 2255-2260
• 15 Gress F G, Hawes R H, Savides T J. et al . Role of EUS in the preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer: a large single-center experience.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 786-791
• 16 Gress F G, Gottlieb K, Sherman S. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspected pancreatic cancer.  Ann Intern Med. 2000;  134 459-464
• 17 Vilmann P, Jacobsen G K, Henriksen F W. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 172-173
• 18 Palazzo L, Hochain P, Helmer C. et al . Biliary varices on endoscopic ultrasonography: clinical presentation and outcome.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 520-524
• 19 Ueno N, Sasaki A, Tomiyama T. et al . Color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of cavernous transformation of the portal vein.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1997;  25 227-233
• 20 De Gaetano A M, Lafortune M, Patriquin H. et al . Cavernous transformation of the portal vein: patterns of intrahepatic and splanchnic collateral circulation detected with Doppler sonography.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;  165 1151-1155