Abstract
The pollinators, flower longevity, and reproductive success of Gongora quinquenervis were studied in Refúgio Ecológico Charles Darwin, a preserved fragment of Atlantic Forest in Pernambuco. G. quinquenervis is epiphytic, and its flowers have osmophores, glands that produce aromatic volatiles, that are collected by males of Euglossini (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Every flower of an inflorescence opened simultaneously, however, overlaps in floral phases between individuals were low. Pollinaria deposition on the stigma caused immediate wilting of the perianth, while pollinaria removal had no influence on flower longevity. The reproductive system experiments showed that the species is self-compatible. The characteristics of floral morphology and its highly specialized pollination mechanism are efficient in limiting autogamy and geitonogamy and favouring cross-pollination. Three species of Euglossa were found (E. cordata, E. perpulchra and an undescribed species) visiting the flowers of G. quinquenervis. All these efficiently removed the pollinaria of the flowers, which adhered to the posterior margin of the scutellum. Even though there was a high pollinaria removal rate by pollinators, the reproductive success in the field was extraordinarily low. We suggest that low fruit set, despite high pollinator frequency, is a result of a combination of the particular phonological characteristics of G. quinquenervis, such as short flower longevity and low overlap of flowering phases between individuals, leading to the reduced population of this orchid in the degraded Atlantic Forest. Conservation measures are necessary to guarantee the survival of G. quinquenervis in the northern part of the Atlantic Forest of Brazil.
Key words
Pollination - Euglossini -
Gongora quinquenervis
- reproductive success - floral longevity.
References
1
Allen P. H..
Pollination in Coryanthes speciosa.
.
American Orchid Society Bulletin.
(1950);
19
528-536
2
Ackerman J. D..
Coping with the epiphytic existence: pollination strategies.
Selbyana.
(1986);
9
52-60
3
Ackerman J. D..
Geographic and seasonal variation in fragrance choices and preferences of male euglossine bees.
Biotropica.
(1989 a);
21 (4)
340-347
4
Ackerman J. D..
Limitations to sexual reproduction in Encyclia krugii (Orchidaceae).
Systematica Botany.
(1989 b);
14
101-109
5
Ackerman J. D., Montalvo A. M..
Short and long-term limitations to fruit production in a tropical orchid.
Ecology.
(1990);
71
267-272
6 Arditti J.. Fundamentals of Orchid Biology. New York; Wiley (1992): 691
7
Arditti J., Hogan N. M., Chadwick A. V..
Post-pollination phenomena in orchid flowers. IV. Effects of Ethylene.
American Journal of Botany.
(1973);
63
201-211
8
Ashman T. L., Schoen D. J..
How long should flowers live?.
Nature.
(1994);
371
788-791
9
Burg S. P., Dijkman M. J..
Ethylene and auxin participation in pollen induced fading of Vanda orchid blossoms.
Plant Physiology.
(1967);
42
1648-1650
10
Carvalho R., Machado I. C..
Pollination of Catasetum Macrocarpum (Orchidaceae) by Eulaema bombiformis (Euglossini).
Lindleyana.
(2002);
17 (2)
85-90
11 Case F.. Orchids of the Western Great Lakes Region. Bloomfield Hills; Cranbrook Institute of Science (1964): 147
12
Chase M. W., Hills H..
Orchid phylogeny, flower sexuality, and fragrance-seeking. Evidence from variation in chloroplast DNA among subtribes Catasetinae and Cyrtopodiinae.
BioScience.
(1992);
42 (1)
43-49
13
Crüger H..
A few notes on the fecundation of orchids and their morphology.
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society of London.
(1865);
8
127-135
14
Devlin B., Stephenson A. G..
Factors that influence the staminate and pistillate phases of Lobelia cardinalis flowers.
Botanical Gazette.
(1984);
145
323-328
15
Dodson C. H..
The importance of pollination in the evolution of the orchids of tropical America.
American Orchid Society Bulletin.
(1962 a);
31
525-554
641-649
731-735
16
Dodson C. H..
Pollination and variation in the subtribe catasetinae (Orchidaceae).
Annals of the Missouri Botanical Gardens.
(1962 b);
49
35-56
17
Dodson C. H..
Studies in orchid pollination, the genus Coryanthes.
.
American Orchid Society Bulletin.
(1965);
34
680-687
18
Dodson C. H..
Ethology of some bees of the tribe Euglossini (Hymenoptera: Apidae).
Kansas Entomological Society.
(1966);
39
607-629
19
Dodson C. H..
Relationship between pollinators and orchid flowers.
Atas do Simpósio sobre a Biota Amazônica (Zoologia).
(1967);
5
1-72
20
Dodson C. H., Frymire G. P..
Natural pollination of orchids.
Missouri Botanical Garden Bulletin.
(1961);
49
133-152
21
Dressler R. L..
Some observations on Gongora.
.
Orchid Digest.
(1966);
30
220-223
22
Dressler R. L..
Why do some euglossine bees visit orchid flowers?.
Atas so Simpósio sobre a Biota Amazônica.
(1967);
5
171-180
23
Dressler R. L..
Pollination by euglossine bees.
Evolution.
(1968);
22
202-212
24 Dressler R. L.. The Orchids: Natural History and Classification. Massachusetts; Harvard University Press (1981): 332
25
Dressler R. L..
Biology of the orchid bees (Euglossini).
Annual Review of Ecological Systematics.
(1982);
13
373-394
26 Dressler R. L.. Phylogeny and Classification of the Orchid Family. Oregon; Dioscorides Press (1993): 314
27 Feinsinger P.. Coevolution and pollination. Futuyma, D. J. and Slatkin, M., eds. Coevolution. Sunderland; Sinauer Associates (1983): 282-310
28 Felix L. P., Carvalho R.. Diversidade de orquídeas no Estado de Pernambuco. Tabarelli, M., and Silva, J. M. C., eds. Diagnóstico da Biodiversidade de Pernambuco, Vol. 1. Recife; Editora Massangana (2002): 207-218
29
Galen C., Plowright R. C..
Testing the accuracy of using peroxidase activity to indicate stigma receptivity.
Canadian Journal of Botany.
(1987);
65
107-111
30
Gerlach G., Schill R..
Composition of orchid scents attracting euglossine bees.
Botanica Acta.
(1991);
104
379-391
31 Gori D. F.. Post-pollination phenomena and adaptative floral changes. Jones, C. E. and Little, R., eds. Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. Toronto; Van Nostrand Reinhold (1983): 31-43
32 Jenny R. A.. Monograph of the Genus Gongora Ruiz and Pavon. Champaign, Illinois; Koeltz Scientific Books (1993): 136
33
Johnson S. D., Nilsson L. A..
Pollen carryover, geitonogamy, and the evolution of deceptive pollination systems in orchids.
Ecology.
(1999);
80 (8)
2607-2619
34
Johnson S. D., Edwards T. J..
The structure and function of orchid pollinaria.
Plant Systematics and Evolution.
(2000);
222
243-269
35
Martini P. C., Willadino L., Alves G. D., Donato V. M. T. S..
Propagação de orquídea Gongora quinquenervis por semeadura in vitro.
.
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira.
(2001);
36 (10)
1319-1324
36 Millar A.. Orchids of Papua New Guinea. Seattle; University of Washington Press (1978): 101
37 Miranda F. E. L. F.. Orquídeas da Amazônia Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro; Expressão e Cultura (1996): 191
38
Nazarov V. V., Gerlach G..
The potential seed productivity of orchid flowers and peculiarities of their pollination systems.
Lindleyana.
(1997);
12 (4)
188-204
39
Neiland M. R. M., Wilcock C. C..
Fruit set, nectar reward, and rarity in the Orchidaceae.
American Journal of Botany.
(1998);
85 (12)
1657-1671
40
Newstron L. E., Frankie G. W., Baker H. G..
A new classification for phenology based on flowering patterns in Lowland Tropical Rain Forest trees at La Selva, Costa Rica.
Biotropica.
(1994);
26
141-159
41
O'Neill S. D..
Pollination regulation of flower development.
Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology.
(1997);
48
547-574
42
Proctor H., Harder L. D..
Effect of pollination success on floral longevity in the orchid Calypso bulbosa.
.
American Journal of Botany.
(1995);
82 (9)
1131-1136
43 Radford A. E., Dickinson W. C., Massey J. R., Bell C. R.. Vascular Plant Systematics. New York; Harper and Row Publishers (1974): 269-284
44 Rebêlo J. M. M.. História Natural das Euglossíneas. As Abelhas das Orquídeas. São Luís; Lithograf Editoria (2001): 152
45 Ruschi A.. Orquídeas do Estrado do Espírito Santo. 2nd ed. 1997. Rio de Janeiro; Expressão e Cultura (1986): 278
46
Stratton D. A..
Longevity of individual flowers in a Costa Rican cloud forest.
Biotropica.
(1989);
21
308-318
47 Van der Pijl L., Dodson C. H.. Orchid Flowers, their Pollination and Evolution. Miami; University of Miami Press (1966): 214
48 Vogel S.. Duftdrüsen im Dienste der Bestäubung: Über Bau und Funktion der Osmophoren. Mainz; Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur (1962): 1-165
49
Vogel S..
Das sexuelle Anlockungsprinzip der Catasetinen und Stanhopeen-Blüten und die wahre Funktion ihres sogenannten Futtergewebes.
Österr. Bot. Z..
(1963);
110 (213)
308-337
50
Weiss M. R., Lamont B. B..
Floral color change and insect pollination: a dynamic relationship.
Israel Journal of Plant Sciences.
(1997);
45
185-199
51
Williams N. H., Whitten W. M..
Orchid floral fragrances and male euglossine bees: methods and advances in the last sesquidecade.
Biological Bulletin.
(1983);
164
355-395
52
Zimmerman J. K., Aide T. M..
Patterns of fruit production in a neotropical orchid: Pollinator vs. resource limitation.
American Journal of Botany.
(1989);
76
67-73
P. Martini
Rua Jerônimo de Albuquerque, nº 86, Apt. 301-B
Casa Forte
Recife, PE 52061-470
Brazil
Email: pcmartini@hotmail.com
Section Editor: G. Gottsberger