PDF herunterladen
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2003; 16(4): 233-238
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-815613
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Laparoscopic Colectomy for Cancer: Why We Should Wait

David W. Dietz
  • Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, and Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
12. Januar 2004 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

The laparoscopic approach to benign diseases of the gallbladder, appendix, stomach, and spleen has been embraced by the surgical and lay communities because of improved short-term outcomes when compared with open laparotomy. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer has been scrutinized more carefully because of oncologic concerns and because of the lack of definitive evidence demonstrating functional benefit when compared with open colectomy. Until data from large prospective, randomized controlled trials are mature, we should wait to offer laparoscopic colectomy to our patients with potentially curable adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum.

KEYWORDS

Laparoscopy - cancer - colectomy

REFERENCES

  • 1 Soper N J, Brunt L M, Kerbl K. Laparoscopic general surgery.  N Engl J Med . 1994;  330 409-419
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Bohm B, Milsom J W, Kitago K, Brand M, Fazio V W. Laparoscopic oncologic total abdominal colectomy with intraperitoneal stapled anastomosis in a canine model.  J Laparoendosc Surg . 1994;  4 23-30
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Milsom J, Bohm B, Hammerhofer K, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional technique in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report.  J Am Coll Surg . 1998;  187 46-5455
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Terry M, Smith C D, Branum G D, Galloway K, Waring J P, Hunter J G. Outcomes of laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease and paraesophageal hernia.  Surg Endosc . 2001;  15 691-699
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Bohm B, Milsom J W, Kitago K, Brand M, Stolfi V M, Fazio V W. Use of laparoscopic techniques in oncologic right colectomy in a canine model.  Ann Surg Oncol. 199;  2 6-13
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Bohm B, Milsom J W, Kitago K, Brand M, Fazio V W. Laparoscopic oncologic total abdominal colectomy with intraperitoneal stapled anastomosis in a canine model.  J Laparoendosc Surg . 1994;  4 23-30
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Stage J G, Schulze S, Moller P. et al . Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma.  Br J Surg . 1997;  84 391-396
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Franklin M E, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D. et al . Prospective comparison of open vs laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma. Five-year results.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1996;  39 (suppl 10) S35-S36
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Milsom J W, Bohm B, Hammerhofer K A, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report.  J Am Coll Surg . 1998;  187 46-54
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Jones D B, Guo L W, Reinhard M K. et al . Impact of pneumoperitoneum on trocar site implantation of colon cancer in hamster model.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1995;  38 1182-1188
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Whelan R L, Lee S W. Review of investigations regarding the etiology of port site tumor recurrence.  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A . 1999;  9 1-16
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Zmora O, Weiss E G. Trocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.  Myth or real concern? Surg Oncol Clin N Am . 2001;  10 625-638
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Lacy A M, Delgado S, Garcia-Valdecasas J C. et al . Port site metastases and recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy. A randomized trial.  Surg Endosc . 1998;  12 1039-1042
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Hartley J E, Mehigan B J, MacDonald A W, Lee P W, Monson R. Patterns of recurrence and survival after laparoscopic and conventional resections for colorectal carcinoma.  Ann Surg . 2000;  232 181-186
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Fleshman J W, Nelson H, Peters W R. et al . Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgery (COST) Study Group.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1996;  39 (suppl 10) S53-S58
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hazebroek E J. COLOR. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer.  Surg Endosc . 2002;  16 949-953
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Stead M L, Brown J M, Bosanquet N. et al . Assessing the relative costs of standard open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer in a randomised controlled trial in the United Kingdom.  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol . 2000;  33 99-103
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Kockerling F, Reymond M A, Schneider C. et al . Prospective multicenter study of the quality of oncological resections in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1998;  41 963-970
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Croce E, Azzola M, Russo R, Golia M, Olmi S. Laparoscopic colectomy: the absolute need for a standard operative technique.  JSLS . 1997;  1 217-224
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Lacy A M, Garcia-Valdecasas J C, Pique J M. et al . Short-term outcome analysis of a randomised study comparing laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer.  Surg Endosc . 1995;  9 1101-1105
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Wishner J D, Baker J W, Hoffman G C. Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy: the learning curve.  Surg Endosc . 1995;  9 1179-1183
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Van Ye M T, Cattey R P, Henry L G. Laparoscopically assisted colon resections compare favourably with open technique.  Surg Laparosc Endosc . 1994;  4 25-31
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Lacy A M, Garcia-Valdecasas J C, Delagado S. et al . Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.  Lancet . 2002;  359 2224-2229
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Vara-Thorbeck C, Garcia-Caballero M, Salvi M. Indications and advantages of laparoscopic-assisted colon resection for carcinoma in elderly patients.  Surg Laparosc Endosc . 1994;  4 110-118
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Monson J RT. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients.  Lancet . 1992;  340 831-833
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Winslow E R, Fleshman J W, Birnbaum E H, Brunt L M. Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy.  Surg Endosc . 2002;  16 1420-1425
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Duepree H J, Senagore A J, Delaney C P, Fazio V W. Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection?.  <~>Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg . 2003;  197 177-181
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Schwenk W, Bohm B, Witt C. Pulmonary function following laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resection.  Arch Surg . 1999;  134 6-12
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Weeks J C, Nelson H, Gelber S. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.  JAMA . 2002;  287 321-328
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P, Werner M, Kehlet H. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection.  Ann Surg . 2000;  232 51-57
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Delaney C P, Fazio V W, Senagore A J, Robinson B, Halverson A L, Remzi F H. `Fast track' postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery.  Br J Surg . 2001;  88 1533-1538
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Evrard S, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Kramar A. Open versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy.  Lancet . 2003;  361 73-76
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Read T E, Mutch M G, Chang B W. et al . Locoregional recurrence and survival after curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon.  J Am Coll Surg . 2002;  195 33-40
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Ceulemans R, Henri M, Dutson E, Leroy J, Marescaux J. Open versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy.  Lancet . 2003;  361 73-76
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Lehnert T, Abel U, Kienle P, Hinz U. Open versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy.  Lancet . 2003;  361 74-76
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Read T E, Myerson R J, Fleshman J W. et al . Surgeon specialty is associated with outcome in rectal cancer treatment.  Dis Colon Rectum . 2002;  45 904-914
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Dorrance H R, Docherty G M, O'Dwyer P J. Effect of surgeon specialty interest on patient outcome after potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery.  Dis Colon Rectum . 2000;  43 492-498
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Klein Kranenbarg E, van de Velde J H C. Surgical trials in oncology: the importance of quality control in the TME trial.  Eur J Cancer . 2002;  38 937-942
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Senagore A J, Luchtefeld M A, Mackeigan J M. What is the learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy?.  Am Surg . 1995;  61 681-685
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Mavrantonis C, Wexner S D, Nogueras J J, Weiss E G, Potenti F, Pikarsky A J. Current attitudes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.  Surg Endosc . 2002;  16 1152-1157
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar