Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-817855
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Validity and Reliability of the Axiom Powertrain Cycle Ergometer When Compared with an SRM Powermeter
Publication History
Accepted after revision: January 6, 2004
Publication Date:
30 July 2004 (online)
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and the reliability of a stationary electromagnetically-braked cycle ergometer (Axiom PowerTrain) against the SRM power measuring crankset. Nineteen male competitive cyclists completed four tests on their bicycle equipped with a 20-strain gauges SRM crankset: a maximal aerobic power (MAP) test and three 10-min time trials (TTs) with three different simulated slopes (0, 3, and 6 %). The Axiom ergometer overestimated (p < 0.05) the SRM power output during the last stage of the MAP test and during TTs, by 5 % and 12 %, respectively. Power output (PO) of the Axiom ergometer drifted significantly (p < 0.05) with the time during TT. These findings indicate that the Axiom ergometer does not provide a valid measure of PO compared with SRM. However, the small coefficient of variation (2.2 %) during the MAP test indicates that the Axiom provides a reliable PO and that it can be used e.g. for relative PO comparisons with competitive cyclists during a race season.
Key words
Power output - SRM system - Axiom PowerTrain - accuracy
References
- 1 Atkinson G, Nevill A M. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998; 26 217-238
- 2 Balmer J, Davison R C, Coleman D A, Bird S R. The validity of power output recorded during exercise performance tests using a Kingcycle air-braked cycle ergometer when compared with an SRM powermeter. Int J Sports Med. 2000; 21 195-199
- 3 Balmer J, Davison R C, Bird S R. Reliability of an air-braked ergometer to record peak power during a maximal cycling test. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32 1790-1793
- 4 Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1 307-310
- 5 Candau B, Grappe F, Ménard M, Barbier B, Millet G Y, Hoffman M, Belli A, Rouillon J D. Simplified deceleration method for assessment of resistive forces in cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999; 31 1441-1447
- 6 Coyle E F, Feltner M E, Kautz S A, Hamilton M, Montain S, Baylor A, Abraham L, Petrek G. Physiological and biomechanical factors associated with elite endurance cycling performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991; 23 93-107
- 7 Finn J P, Maxwell R, Withers R T. Air-braked cycle ergometers: Validity of the correction factor for barometric pressure. Int J Sports Med. 2000; 21 488-491
- 8 Grappe F, Candau R, Barbier B, Hoffman M, Belli A, Rouillon J D. Influence of tyre pressure and vertical load on coefficient of rolling resistance and simulated cycling performance. Ergonomics. 1999; 10 1361-1371
- 9 Hickey M S, Costill D L, McConee G K, Widrick J J, Tanaka H. Day to day variation in time trial cycling performance. Int J Sports Med. 1992; 13 467-470
- 10 Hopkins W G, Hawley J A, Burke L M. Design and analysis of research on sport performance enhancement. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999; 31 472-485
-
11 Jones S M, Passfield L.
Dynamic calibration of bicycle power measuring cranks. Haake SJ The Engineering of Sport. Oxford; Blackwell Science 1998: 265-274 - 12 Lawton E W, Martin D T, Lee H. Validation of SRM Power Cranks Using Dynamic Calibration. Fifth IOC World Congress, Oct 31 - Nov 5, 1999. Sydney; International Olympic Committee 1999
- 13 Martin J C, Milliken D L, Cobb J E, McFadden K L, Coggan A R. Validation of a mathematical model for road cycling power. J Appl Biomech. 1998; 14 276-291
- 14 Millet G P, Tronche C, Fuster N, Bentley D J, Candau R. Validity and reliability of the Polar®S710 mobile cycling powermeter. Int J Sports Med. 2003; 24 156-161
- 15 Nevill A. Why the analysis of performance variables recorded on a ratio scale will invariably benefit from a log transformation. J Sports Sci. 1997; 15 457-458
- 16 Nevill A M, Atkinson G. Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science. Br J Sports Med. 1997; 31 314-318
- 17 Paton C D, Hopkins W G. Tests of cycling performance. Sports Med. 2001; 31 489-496
- 18 Perrey S, Grappe F, Girard A, Bringard A, Groslambert A, Bertucci W, Rouillon J D. Physiological and metabolic responses of triathletes to a simulated 30 min time trial in cycling at self-selected intensity. Int J Sports Med. 2003; 24 138-143
- 19 Reiser M, Meyer T, Kindermann W, Daugs R. Transferability of workload measurements between three different types of ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000; 82 245-249
- 20 Vandewalle H, Peres G, Heller J, Panel J, Monod H. Force-velocity relationship and maximal power on a cycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1987; 56 650-656
- 21 Van Praagh E, Bedu M, Roddier P, Coudert J. A simple calibration method for mechanically braked cycle ergometers. Int J Sports Med. 1992; 13 27-30
W. Bertucci
Laboratoire des Sciences du Sport
Place Saint-Jacques
25000 Besançon
France
Phone: + 33381665681
Fax: + 33 3 81 66 56 92
Email: wil.ber@oreka.com