Download PDF
Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2004; 47(2): 119-123
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-818453
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Decompression without Anterior Transposition: An Effective Minimally Invasive Technique for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

M.  Pavelka1 , M.  Rhomberg1 , D.  Estermann1 , W.  N.  Löscher2 , H.  Piza-Katzer1
  • 1University Hospital of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Quality Control in Plastic Surgery, Leopold-Franzens University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
  • 2University Hospital of Neurology, Leopold-Franzens University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 July 2004 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Cubital tunnel syndrome represents the second most common compression neuropathy in the upper limb. There are three main surgical procedures to deal with this issue, namely simple decompression, medial epicondylectomy and anterior transposition. Nevertheless, optimal surgical treatment is still open to question. In the past three years we performed decompression of the nerve with or without external neurolysis and epineuriotomy on 52 patients (55 extremities). Preoperative diagnostic procedures included functional hand status, neurophysiological evaluation, X-ray of the elbow and neurosonography. Patients were then divided into three groups according to the staging criteria of Dellon. After an average follow-up of 13 months, the outcome was evaluated by complete examination of hand function, electrophysiological studies and interview with the patients. Postoperatively, two-point discrimination as well as strength improved significantly. Postoperative grip was 28.78 kg (79.8 % of the other hand), compared to 20.31 kg (58 % of the other hand) preoperatively (p = 0.000). Evaluation of each stage individually showed that the best functional outcome was achieved by the minimum-staged group with improvements in strength and sensory in all patients and total relief in two-thirds. In the severe-staged group, improvement could still be found in 75 % of the patients. Evaluation of conduction velocities showed highly significant improvements for both motor and sensory conduction velocities. In summary, simple decompression, if necessary modified with external neurolysis and epineuriotomy, showed high success rates in all stages. Decompression is a minimally invasive procedure, but very effective for mild as well as for severe cases and therefore the optimal treatment in cubital tunnel syndrome.

Key words

Cubital tunnel syndrome - ulnar nerve - decompression - elbow

References

  • 1 Bartels R H, Menovsky T, Overbeeke J J van, Verhagen W I. Surgical management of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow: an analysis of the literature.  J Neurosurg. 1998;  89 722-727
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Bartels R H. History of the surgical treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow.  Neurosurgery. 2001;  49 391-399
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Earle H. Cases and observations, illustrating the influence of the nervous system in regulating animal heat.  Medico Chirugico Transactions. 1816;  7 173-194
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Posner M A. Compressive neuropathies of the ulnar nerve at the elbow and wrist.  Instr Course Lect. 2000;  49 305-317
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Mowlavi A, Andrews K, Lille S, Verhulst S, Zook E G, Milner S. The management of cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of clinical studies.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;  106 327-334
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Dellon A L. Review of treatment results for ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1989;  14 688-700
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Filippi R, Farag S, Reisch R, Grunert P, Bocher-Schwarz H. Cubital tunnel syndrome. Treatment by decompression without transposition of ulnar nerve.  Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2002;  45 164-168
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Heithoff S J. Cubital tunnel syndrome does not require transposition of the ulnar nerve.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1999;  24 898-905
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Nathan P A, Keniston R C, Meadows K D. Outcome study of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow treated with simple decompression and an early programme of physical therapy.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1995;  20 628-637
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Balogh B, Vass A, Piza-Katzer H. Is transposition of the ulnar nerve in ulnar nerve sulcus syndrome really indicated?.  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1997;  29 133-138
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Bimmler D, Meyer V E. Surgical treatment of the ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathy: submuscular anterior transposition or simple decompression of the ulnar nerve? Long-term results in 79 cases.  Ann Chir Main Memb Super. 1996;  15 148-157
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Steiner H H, Haken M S von, Steiner-Milz H G. Entrapment neuropathy at the cubital tunnel: simple decompression is the method of choice.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;  138 308-313
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Davies M A, Vonau M, Blum P W, Kwok B CT, Matheson J M, Stening W A. Results of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow treated by decompression or anterior transposition.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1991;  61 929-934
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Assmus H. Simple decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome with and without morphologic changes. Report of experiences based on 523 cases.  Nervenarzt. 1994;  65 846-853
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kleinman W B. Cubital tunnel syndrome: anterior transposition as a logical approach to complete nerve decompression.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1999;  24 886-897
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Teoh L C, Yong F C, Tan S H, Andrew Chin Y H. Anterior subfascial transposition of the ulnar nerve.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 2003;  28 73-76
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Lowe 3rd J B, Novak C B, Mackinnon S E. Current approach to cubital tunnel syndrome.  Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2001;  12 267-284
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Lascar T, Laulan J. Cubital tunnel syndrome: a retrospective review of 53 anterior subcutaneous transpositions.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 2000;  25 453-456
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Glowacki K A, Weiss A P. Anterior intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997;  6 89-96
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Plancher K D, McGillicuddy J O, Kleinman W B. Anterior intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve.  Hand Clin. 1996;  12 435-444
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Heithoff S J, Millender L H, Nalebuff E A, Petruska Jr A J. Medial epicondylectomy for the treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1990;  15 22-29
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Seradge H, Owen W. Cubital tunnel release with medial epicondylectomy factors influencing the outcome.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1998;  23 483-491
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Muermans S, De Smet L. Partial medial epicondylectomy for cubital tunnel syndrome: Outcome and complications.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;  11 248-252
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Kaempffe F A, Farbach J. A modified surgical procedure for cubital tunnel syndrome: partial medial epicondylectomy.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1998;  23 492-499
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Tada H, Hirayama T, Katsuki M, Habaguchi T. Long-term results using a modified King's method for cubital tunnel syndrome.  Clin Orthop. 1997;  336 107-110
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Geutjens G G, Langstaff R J, Smith N J, Jefferson D, Howell C J, Barton N J. Medial epicondylectomy or ulnar-nerve transposition for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow?.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1996;  78 777-779
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Barone C M, Jimenez D F, Frempog-Bodeau A. Blood-flow measurements of injured peripheral nerves by laser Doppler flowmetry.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1992;  8 319-323
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Sunderland S. Blood supply of the seves of the upper limb in man.  Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1945;  53 91-115
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Ogata K, Manske P R, Lesker P A. The effect of surgical dissection on regional blood flow to the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel.  Clin Orthop. 1985;  193 195-198
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Lim B H, Toh C L, Wong H P, Pho R W. Cadaveric study on the vascular anatomy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow - a basis for anterior transposition?.  Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1992;  21 689-693
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Smith J W. Factors influencing nerve repair. I. Blood supply of peripheral nerves.  Arch Surg. 1966;  93 335-341
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Smith J W. Factors influencing nerve repair. II. Collateral circulation of peripheral nerves.  Arch Surg. 1966;  93 433-437
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Asami A, Morisawa K, Tsuruta T. Functional outcome of anterior transposition of the vascularized ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1998;  23 613-616
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 King T. The treatment of traumatic ulnar neuritis: mobilization of the ulnar nerve at the elbow by removal of the medial epicondyle and adjacent bone.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1950;  20 33-42
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Nathan P A. Comparison between partial and minimal medial epicondylectomy.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 2001;  26 559-560
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Amako M, Nemoto K, Kawaguchi M, Kato N, Arino H, Fujikawa K. Comparison between partial and minimal medial epicondylectomy combined with decompression for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 2000;  25 1043-1050
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Morrey B F, An K N. Articular and ligamentous contributions to the stability of the elbow joint.  Am J Sports Med. 1983;  11 315-319
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Taniguchi Y, Takami M, Takami T, Yoshida M. Simple decompression with small incision for cubital tunnel syndrome.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 2002;  27 559-562
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

Dr. Michaela Pavelka

Universitäts-Klinik für Plastische und Wiederherstellungschirurgie · Leopold-Franzens University

Anichstraße 35

6020 Innsbruck

Austria

Phone: +43-512-504-2731

Fax: +43-512-504-2735

Email: michaela.pavelka@uibk.ac.at