Third Ventriculostomy in Communicating Hydrocephalus in Adult Patients - The Role of Lumbar and Cranial Cerebrospinal Fluid Outflow Measurement

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the value of CSF outflow resistance testing as a criterion for endscopic treatment in case of communicating hydrocephalus.

Methods: 12 patients with communicating hydrocephalus were integrated in a prospective study from 1999 - 2001. Under the assumption of different hydromechanical properties of both spinal and cerebral CSF compartment the resorption capacity was measured. V.-p. shunting, ventriculostomy or conservative treatment were performed dependent on the results and clinical outcome was evaluated.

Results: Six patients with pathological lumbar testing underwent primary ventriculo-peritoneal shunting. In 6 of the 12 cases the lumbar CSF resorption capacity was found to be normal and cerebral testing was accomplished. Two patients with normal spinal and cerebral resorption capacity were not operated. In the remaining 4 patients cerebral testing was found to be pathological and ventriculostomy was performed. An improvement of clinical symptoms was observed in patients operated with a v.-p. shunt and in the VCS group as well.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that there is a subgroup of patients with morphological communicating hydrocephalus that is characterized by a functional dissociation of hydromechanical properties of intracranial and spinal CSF compartment. In cases of regular CSF resorption but restricted CSF outflow from the ventricular system to the subarachnoid space ventriculo-peritoneal shunting may be an efficient therapy, but VCS was proved to be an efficient alternative.

Key words

Third ventriculostomy - neuroendoscopy - CSF resorption capacity - communicating hydrocephalus

References

• 1 Ishikawa M, Kikuchi H, Hirai O. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in the aged.  No Shinkei Geka. 1994;  22 309-315
• 2 Williams M A, Razumovsky A Y, Hanley D F. Comparison of Pcsf monitoring and controlled CSF drainage diagnose normal pressure hydrocephalus.  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1998;  71 (Suppl) 328-330
• 3 Larsson A, Wikkelso C, Bilting M. et al . Clinical parameters in 74 consecutive patients shunt operated for normal pressure hydrocephalus.  Acta Neurol Scand. 1991;  84 475-482
• 4 Badiane S B, Sakho Y, Kabre A. et al . Peritoneal pseudocysts: complications of ventriculo-peritoneal shunts. Apropos of 3 cases.  Dakar Med. 1997;  42 149-151
• 5 Borgbjerg B M, Gjerris F, Albeck M J. et al . Frequency and causes of shunt revisions in different cerebrospinal fluid shunt types.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995;  136 189-194
• 6 Espinosa J. Normal pressure hydrocephalus.  Rev Med Panama. 1991;  16 189-194
• 7 Gomez L L, Luaces C C, Costa Clara J M. et al . Complications of cerebrospinal fluid shunt.  An Esp Pediatr. 1998;  48 368-370
• 8 Hirsch J F, Hoppe-Hirsch E, Sainte-Rose C. Overdrainage in the treatment of hydrocephalus.  Pediatrie. 1991;  46 617-623
• 9 Molke B B, Gjerris F, Albeck M J. et al . Frequency of infections after shunting of hydrocephalus. An analysis of 884 shunts.  Ugeskr Laeger. 1997;  159 2867-2871
• 10 Okoro B A, Ohaegbulam S C. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunts in children. A ten year experience at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu-Nigeria.  West Afr J Med. 1992;  11 284-291
• 11 PopIe I K, Quinn M W, Bayston R. Morbidity and outcome of shunted hydrocephalus.  Z Kinderchir. 1990;  45 (SuppI 1) 29-31
• 12 Bech R A, Bogeskov L, Borgesen S E. et al . Indications for shunt insertion or III ventriculostomy in hydrocephalic children, guided by lumbar and intraventricular infusion tests.  Childs Nerv Syst. 1999;  15 213-217
• 13 Hoglund M, Tisell M, Wikkelso C. Incidence of surgery for hydrocephalus in adults surveyed: same number afflicted by hydrocephalus as by multiple sclerosis.  Lakartidningen. 2001;  98 1681-1685
• 14 Kim O S, Choi J U, Huh R. et al . Quantitative assessment of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics using a phase-contrast cine MR image in hydrocephalus.  Childs Nerv Syst. 1999;  15 461-467
• 15 Meier U. Shunt operation versus endoscopic ventriculostomy in normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostics and outcome.  Zentralbl Neurochir. 2003;  64 19-23
• 16 Meier U, Zeilinger F S, Schonherr B. Endoscopic ventriculostomy versus shunt operation in normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostics and indication.  Acta Neurochir. 2000;  76 (Suppl) 563-566
• 17 Meier U, Zeilinger F S, Schonherr B. Endoscopic ventriculostomy versus shunt operation in normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostics and indication.  Minim lnvas Neurosurg. 2000;  43 87-90
• 18 Mitchell P, Mathew B. Third ventriculostomy in normal pressure hydrocephalus.  Br J Neurosurg. 1999;  13 382-385
• 19 Hussey F, Schanzer B, Katzman R. A simple constant-infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absorption. II. Clinical studies.  Neurology. 1970;  20 665-680
• 20 Katzman R, Hussey F. A simple constant-infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absorption. I. Rationale and method.  Neurology. 1970;  20 534-544
• 21 Borgesen S E. Conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1984;  71 1-45
• 22 Borgesen S E, Gjerris F. The predictive value of conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus.  Brain. 1982;  105 65-86
• 23 Hakim S, Venegas J G, Burton J D. The physics of the cranial cavity, hydrocephalus and normal pressure hydrocephalus: mechanical interpretation and mathematical model.  Surg Neurol. 1976;  5 187-210
• 24 Penar P L, Lakin W D, Yu J. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: an analysis of aetiology and response to shunting based on mathematical modeling.  Neurol Res. 1995;  17 83-88
• 25 Rekate H L, Brodkey J A, Chizeck H J. et al . Ventricular volume regulation: a mathematical model and computer simulation.  Pediatr Neurosci. 1988;  14 77-84
• 26 Guinane J E. Why does hydrocephalus progress?.  J NeuroI Sci. 1977;  32 1-8
• 27 Quencer R M. Intracranial CSF flow in pediatric hydrocephalus: evaluation with cine-MR imaging.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1992;  13 601-608
• 28 Quencer R M, Post M J, Hinks R S. Cine MR in the evaluation of normal and abnormal CSF flow: intracranial and intraspinal studies.  Neuroradiology. 1990;  32 371-391
• 29 Albeck M J, Skak C, Nielsen P R. et al . Age dependency of resistance to cerebrospinal fluid outflow.  J Neurosurg. 1998;  89 275-278
• 30 Borgesen S E, Gjerris F. Relationships between intracranial pressure, ventricular size, and resistance to CSF outflow.  J Neurosurg. 1987;  67 535-539
• 31 Egeler-Peerdeman S M, Barkhof F, Walchenbach R. et al . Cine phase-contrast MR imaging in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients: relation to surgical outcome.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;  71 (Suppl) 340-342
• 32 Nagashima T, Tamaki N, Matsumoto S. et al . Biomechanics of hydrocephalus: a new theoretical model.  Neurosurgery. 1987;  21 898-904
• 33 White O N, Wilson K C, Curry G R. et al . The limitation of pulsatile flow through the aqueduct of Sylvius as a cause of hydrocephalus.  J Neurol Sci. 1979;  42 11-51
• 34 Bradley W G. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: new concepts on etiology and diagnosis.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;  21 1586-1590
• 35 Bradley Jr W G, Whittemore A R, Watanabe A S. et al . Association of deep white matter infarction with chronic communicating hydrocephalus: implications regarding the possible origin of normal-pressure hydrocephalus.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;  12 31-39
• 36 Ishikawa M, Kikuchi H, Taki W. et al . Regional cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism in normal pressure hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage.  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1989;  29 382-388
• 37 Kehler U, Gliemroth J. Extraventricular intracisternal obstructive hydrocephalus - a hypothesis to explain successful 3^rd ventriculostomy in communicating hydrocephalus.  Pediatr Neurosurg. 2003;  38 98-101