Vaginale Beckenendlage - Teil 1

Klaus Vetter

doi:10.1055/s-2004-820853

Subscribe to RSS

Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.

https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000020.xml

Share / Bookmark

Facebook Linkedin Weibo

Download PDF

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2003; 63(11): R229-R244
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-820853

GebFra-Refresher

Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Vaginale Beckenendlage - Teil 1

Klaus Vetter¹

¹Berlin

Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 November 2003 (online)

Also available at

Abstract
Full Text
References

Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Äußere Wendung des Kindes in Schädellage

Beckenendlage - was ist zu tun? Die Entscheidung zum Entbindungsmodus aus Beckenendlage stellt häufig ein Problem für alle Beteiligten dar. Auf welchem Wege wird die Schwangere ihr Kind bekommen?

Mit dieser Fragestellung wendet sich die Schwangere meistens 5 - 6 Wochen vor dem errechneten Termin an den Geburtshelfer. Einerseits besitzt die ärztliche Beratung eine wichtige Funktion. Sie soll die Schwangere über die verschiedenen Möglichkeiten informieren: die externe Wendung aus Steißlage in Schädellage, die vaginale Geburt und letztlich die elektive Sectio caesarea. Im Gespräch sollten alle Vor- und Nachteile sowie die Risiken der einzelnen Interventionen sachlich und emotionsfrei erläutert werden. Andererseits sollte der Geburtshelfer auch über die notwendigen manuellen Fertigkeiten der o. g. Methoden verfügen.

Die Refresher „Externe Wendung“ und „Vaginale Beckenendlagen-Entbindung“ sollen in der Folge das notwendige Wissen kompakt darstellen.

Literatur

1 ACOG . Committee opinion: number 265, Dec 2001. Mode of term single breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98 1189-1190

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
2 Adams E K, Mauldin P D, Mauldin J G, Mayberry Th. Determining cost savings from attempted cephalic version in an inner city delivering population. Manag Sci. 2000; 3 185-192

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
3 Ang L. Compound presentation following external version. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1978; 18 213-214

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
4 Bänninger U, Schmid J. Äußere Wendung in Terminnähe. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1977; 181 189-192

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
5 Becroft D, Gun T. Prenatal cranial haemorrhages in 47 Pacific Islander infants: is traditional massage the cause?. N Z Med J. 1989; 102 207-210

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
6 Belfort M. Intravenous nitroglycerin as a tocolytic agent for intrapartum external cephalic version. S Afr Med J. 1993; 83 656

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
7 Ben Arie A, Kogan S, Schachter M. et al . The impact of external cephalic version on the rate of vaginal and cesarean breech deliveries: A 3-year cumulative experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995; 63 125-129

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
8 Benifla J, Goffinet F, Darai E. et al . Antepartum transabdominal amnioinfusion to facilitate external cephalic version after initial failure. Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 84 1041-1042

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
9 Berg D, Kunze U. Critical remarks on external cephalic version under tocolysis. Report on a case of antepartum fetal death. J Perinat Med. 1977; 5 32-38

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
10 Birnbach D J, Matut J, Stein D J. et al . The effect of intrathecal analgesia on the success of external cephalic version. Anesth Analg. 2001; 93 410-413

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
11 Bradley-Watson P. The decreasing value of external cephalic version in modern obstetric practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975; 123 237-240

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
12 Brocks V, Philipsen T, Secher N. A randomized trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984; 91 653-656

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
13 Brost B, Calhoun B, Van Dorste J. Compound presentation resulting from the forward-roll technique of external cephalic version: a possible mechanism. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174 884-885

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
14 Calhoun B, Edgeworth D, Brehm W. External cephalic version at a military teaching hospital: predictors of success. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995; 35 277-279

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
15 Cantu-Esquivel M, Benavides-de la Garza L, Escobedo-Lobaton J. et al . External version in pelvic presentation. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1996; 64 474-476

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
16 Carlan S J, Dent J M, Huckaby T. et al . The effect of epidural anesthesia on safety and success of external cephalic version at term. Anesth Analg. 1994; 79 525-528

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
17 Caukwell S, Joels L A, Kyle P M. et al . Women's attitudes towards management of breech presentation at term. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 22 486-488

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
18 Cherayil G, Feinberg B, Robinson J. et al . Central neuraxial blockade promotes external cephalic version success after a failed attempt. Anesth Analg. 2002; 94 1589-1592

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
19 Chung T, Neale E, Lau T. et al . A randomized, double blind, controlled trial of tocolysis to assist external cephalic version in late pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995; 75 720-724

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
20 DeRosa J, Anderle L. External cephalic version of term singleton breech presentations with tocolysis: a retrospective study in a community hospital. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1991; 91 351-352 355-357

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
21 Donald W, Barton J. Ultrasonography and external cephalic version at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 162 1542-1545 discussion 1545-1547

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
22 Dugoff L, Stamm C A, Jones O W. et al . The effect of spinal anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 93 345-349

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
23 Dyson D, d. Ferguson JE, Hensleigh P. Antepartum external cephalic version under tocolysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 67 63-68

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
24 Engel K, Gerke Engel G, Gerhard I. et al . Fetomaternale Makrotransfusion (fmmt) nach erfolgreicher innerer Wendung aus Beckenendlage durch Moxibustion. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 1992; 52 241-243

Search in Google Scholar
25 Extermann P. Version cephalique externe. Jahresversammlung der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Lugano 1997. Bern; Verlag Bäbler 1997

Search in Google Scholar
26 Ezra Y, Elram T, Plotkin V. et al . Significance of success rate of external cephalic versions and vaginal breech deliveries in counseling women with breech presentation at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol. 2002; 90 63-66

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
27 Fall O, Nilsson B. External cephalic version in breech presentation under tocolysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1979; 53 712-715

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
28 Ferguson JE 2nd . Intrapartum external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 152 297-298

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
29 Flamm B, Fried M, Lonky N. et al . External cephalic version after previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165 370-372

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
30 Flanagan T, Mulchahey K, Korenbrot C. et al . Management of term breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 156 1492-1502

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
31 Foote A. External cephalic version from 34 weeks under tocolysis: factors influencing success. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995; 21 127-132

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
32 Fortunato S, Mercer L, Guzick D. External cephalic version with tocolysis: factors associated with success. Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 72 59-62

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
33 Franckx J, Sacre-Smits L. Severe neonatal anemia possibly caused by spontaneous cephalic version, with excellent outcome-a case report. J Perinat Med. 1984; 12 147-150

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
34 Ghidini A, Korker V. Fetal complication after external cephalic version at term: case report and literature review. J Matern Fetal Med. 1999; 8 190-192

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
35 Gifford D, Keeler E, Kahn K. Reductions in cost and cesarean rate by routine use of external cephalic version: a decision analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85 930-936

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
36 Giusti M, Bertolotti G C, Nappi R E. et al . [External cephalic version as a possible treatment of breech presentation]. Minerva Ginecologica. 2000; 52 221-227

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
37 Gjode P, Rasmussen T, Jorgensen J. Fetomaternal bleeding during attempts at external version. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980; 87 571-573

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
38 Hanss Jr J W. The efficacy of external cephalic version and its impact on the breech experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 162 1459-1464

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
39 Hellstrom A, Nilsson B, Stange L. et al . When does external cephalic version succeed?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1990; 69 281-285

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
40 Hofmeyr G. Effect of external cephalic version in late pregnancy on breech presentation and caesarean section rate: a controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983; 90 392-399

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
41 Hofmeyr G J. External cephalic version at term. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 1993; 5 213-222

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
42 Hofmeyr G J. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Online: Update Software 2000: CD000084.
43 Hofmeyr G J. Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Online: Update Software 2002: CD000184.
44 Hofmeyr G J, Kulier R. Cephalic version by postural management for breech presentation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Online: Update Software 2000: CD000051.
45 Hofmeyr G J, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Online: Update Software 2000: CD000083.
46 Impey L, Lissoni D. Outcome of external cephalic version after 36 weeks' gestation without tocolysis. J Matern Fetal Med. 1999; 8 203-207

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
47 James M, Hunt K, Burr R. et al . A decision analytical cost analysis of offering ECV in a UK district general hospital. . 2001; 1 6

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
48 Kainer F, Pertl B, Netzbandt P. et al . Der Einfluß der Ultraschalluntersuchung bei der äußeren Wendung der Beckenendlage. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 1994; 54 108-110

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
49 Kaneti H, Rosen D, Markov S. et al . Intrapartum external cephalic version of footling-breech presentation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000; 79 1083-1085

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
50 Kilpatrick S, Safford K. Repeat external cephalic version. Is it worth the effort?. J Reprod Med. 1995; 40 775-778

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
51 Köppel R, Benz J. Äußere Wendung der Beckenendlage - eine Möglichkeit zur Senkung der Sectiorate und der kindlichen Morbidität. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 1986; 46 710-714

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
52 Kurup A, Arulkumaran S, Montan S. et al . Need for fetal assessment prior to and during external cephalic version: Occurrence of transient cardiac asystole. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993; 72 60-62

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
53 Laros Jr R K. Flanagan TA, Kilpatrick SJ. Management of term breech presentation: A protocol of external version and selective trial of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172 1916-1925

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
54 Lau T, Kit K, Rogers M. Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 176 218-223

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
55 Lau T, Stock A, Rogers M. Fetomaternal haemorrhage after external cephalic version at term. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995; 35 173-174

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
56 Lehmann V, Rodt C, Criegern T. Äußere Wendung aus Beckenendlage in Schädellage. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1977; 181 390-395

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
57 Leung T Y, Lau T K, Lo K W. et al . A survey of pregnant women's attitude towards breech delivery and external cephalic version. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000; 40 253-259

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
58 Mancuso K M, Yancey M K, Murphy J A. et al . Epidural analgesia for cephalic version: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 95 648-651

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
59 Marchick R. Antepartum external cephalic version with tocolysis: a study of term singleton breech presentations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 158 1339-1346

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
60 Marcus R, Crewe-Brown H, Krawitz S. et al . Feto-maternal haemorrhage following successful and unsuccessful attempts at external cephalic version. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975; 82 578-580

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
61 Marquette G, Boucher M, Theriault D. et al . Does the use of a tocolytic agent affect the success rate of external cephalic version?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175 859-861

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
62 Mashiach R, Hod M, Kaplan B. et al . External cephalic version at term using broad criteria: effect on mode of delivery. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 22 279-284

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
63 Mauldin J, Mauldin P, Feng T. et al . Determining the clinical efficacy and cost savings of successful external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175 1639-1644

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
64 Megory E, Ohel G, Fisher O. et al . Mode of delivery following external cephalic version and induction of labor at term. Am J Perinatol. 1995; 12 404-406

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
65 Morrison J, Myatt R, Martin J N. et al . External cephalic version of the breech presentation under tocolysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 154 900-903

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
66 Äußere Wendung 1974 bis 1996. Abteilung für Geburtsmedizin Neukölln, Berlin. 1997

Search in Google Scholar
67 Nohe G, Hartmann W, Klapproth C. Äußere Wendung des Feten als ambulanter Eingriff. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 1996; 56 328-330

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
68 Nord E, Blaschke E, Green K. et al . 100 cases of external cephalic version, with special reference to fetomaternal transfusion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989; 68 55-58

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
69 O'Grady J P, Veille J C, Holland R L. et al . External cephalic version: A clinical experience. J Perinat Med. 1986; 14 189-196

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
70 Periti E, Nannini R. External version in the breech presentation: a review of the literature and our experience. Minerva Ginecol. 1995; 47 9-15

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
71 Phelan J, Stine L, Mueller E. et al . Observations of fetal heart rate characteristics related to external cephalic version and tocolysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984; 149 658-661

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
72 Pluta M, Giffei J, Saling E. Die äußere Wendung des Feten aus Beckenendlage bei Patientinnen mit Zustand nach abdominaler Schnittentbindung. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1981; 185 121-123

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
73 Pluta M, Schmidt S, Giffei J. et al . Die äußere Wendung des Feten aus Beckenendlage in Schädellage in Terminnähe unter Tokolyse. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1981; 185 207-215

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
74 Rabinovici J, Barkai G, Shalev J. et al . Impact of a protocol for external cephalic version under tocolysis at term. Isr J Med Sci. 1986; 22 34-40

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
75 Regalia A L, Curiel P, Natale N. et al . Routine use of external cephalic version in three hospitals. Birth (Berkeley, Calif. ). 2000; 27 19-24

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
76 Ruangchainikom W, Chareonporn C. External cephalic version at Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital. J Med Ass Thailand (Chotmaihet Thangphaet). 2001; 84 1258-1262

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
77 Saling E, De Almeida P, Schwarzenau E. Äußere Wendung des Feten aus Beckenendlage in Schädellage. Auswertung von 1000 Fällen. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 1993; 53 597-602

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
78 Saling E, Müller-Holve W. Die äußere Wendung des Feten aus Beckenendlage in Schädellage unter Tokolyse. Dudenhausen JW, Saling E, Schmidt E 7. Deutscher Kongreß für Perinatale Medizin. Berlin; Georg Thieme Verlag 1974

Search in Google Scholar
79 Saling E, Müller-Holve W. External cephalic version under tocolysis. J Perinat Med. 1975; 3 115-122

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
80 Schachter M, Kogan S, Blickstein I. External cephalic version after previous cesarean section - A clinical dilemma. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1994; 45 17-20

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
81 Schlensker K, Enderer-Steinfort G, Bolte A. Die äußere Wendung des Feten aus Beckenendlage in Schädellage am Schwangerschaftsende. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 1978; 38 744-753

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
82 Schmolling J, Feodorovici C, Ulrich U, Richter O. Fetomaternal macrotransfusion after attempted external version. Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2001; 205 200-203

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
83 Schüngel P. Die äußere Wendung aus Beckenendlage.
84 Shalev E, Battino S, Giladi Y. et al . External cephalic version at term - using tocolysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993; 72 455-457

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
85 Shan J. Improved cephalic version: a report of 669 cases. Chung Hua Fu Chan Ko Tsa Chih. 1989; 24 76-80 123

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
86 Siddiqui D, Stiller R J, Collins J. et al . Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181 1092-1095

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
87 Smith C, Crowther C, Wilkinson C. et al . Knee-chest postural management for breech at term: a randomized controlled trial. Birth (Berkeley, Calif. ). 1999; 26 71-75

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
88 Stine L, Phelan J, Wallace R. et al . Update on external cephalic version performed at term. Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 65 642-646

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
89 Tan G, Jen S, Tan S. et al . A prospective randomised controlled trial of external cephalic version comparing two methods of uterine tocolysis with a non-tocolysis group. Singapore Med J. 1989; 30 155-158

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
90 Teoh T. Outcome of external cephalic version: our experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 1996; 22 389-394

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
91 Thunedborg P, Fischer Rasmussen W, Tollund L. The benefit of external cephalic version with tocolysis as a routine procedure in late pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991; 42 23-27

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
92 Wallace R, VanDorsten J, Eglinton G. et al . External cephalic version with tocolysis. Observations and continuing experience at the Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center. J Reprod Med. 1984; 29 745-748

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
93 Weiner Z, Farmakides G, Hsieh H. et al . Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate changes after antepartum external cephalic version. J Reprod Med. 1996; 41 680-684

PubMed Search in Google Scholar
94 Yogev Y, Horowitz E, Ben-Haroush A. et al . Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations. Int J Gynaecol. 2002; 79 221-224

Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar

Klaus Vetter

Klinik für Geburtsmedizin
Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln

Mariendorfer Weg 28

12051 Berlin

Email: klaus.vetter@vivantes.de