Systematic evaluation of facial nerve paralysis allows the clinician to determine objectively the severity of disability, record and communicate this information to colleagues, and evaluate response to therapy. An ideal grading system would be precisely calibrated-at once accurate, reliable, and conducive to use in both the clinic and the research laboratory. Developing such a system has proved difficult, however. The complexity of facial nerve anatomy allows tremendous variation in clinical presentation, and assessments of facial expression are inherently subjective in nature. Carefully defined parameters are therefore crucial in performing objective and quantitative analyses. This article reviews the clinical considerations involved in grading facial function and traces the evolution of current approaches. Emphasis is placed upon advances in computer-based facial nerve grading.
KEYWORDS
Facial nerve paralysis - facial nerve palsy - facial expression - facial nerve
REFERENCES
-
1
Neely J G, Neufeld P S.
Defining functional limitation, disability, and societal limitations in patients with facial paresis: initial pilot questionnaire.
Am J Otol.
1996;
17
340-342
-
2
Brach J S, VanSwearingen J, Delitto A, Johnson P C.
Impairment and disability in patients with facial neuromuscular dysfunction.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1997;
117
315-321
-
3
Kahn J B, Gliklich R E, Boyev K P, Stewart M G, Metson R B, McKenna M J.
Validation of a patient-graded instrument for facial nerve paralysis: the FACE scale.
Laryngoscope.
2001;
111
387-398
-
4
VanSwearingen J M, Brach J S.
The Facial Disability Index: reliability and validity of a disability assessment instrument for disorders of the facial neuromuscular system.
Phys Ther.
1996;
76
1288-1298
-
5
VanSwearingen J M, Cohn J F, Turnbull J, Mrzai T, Johnson P.
Psychological distress: linking impairment with disability in facial neuromotor disorders.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1998;
118
790-796
-
6 Duchenne B. Mécanisme de la physionomie humaine ou analyse éléctrophysiologique de l'expression des passions. Paris; Bailliére 1862
-
7
Frois-Wittman J.
The judgment of facial expression.
J Exp Psychol.
1942;
13
113-151
-
8
Fulcher J S.
‘Voluntary’ facial expression in blind and seeing children.
Arch Psychol.
1942;
38
5-49
-
9
Landis C.
Studies of emotional reactions. II: General behaviour and facial expression.
J Comp Psychol.
1924;
4
447-509
-
10
Thompson J.
Development of facial expression of emotion in blind and seeing children.
Arch Psychol.
1941;
37
5-47
-
11
May M.
Facial paralysis, peripheral type: a proposed method of reporting. (Emphasis on diagnosis and prognosis, as well as electrical and chorda tympani nerve testing).
Laryngoscope.
1970;
80
331-390
-
12
House J W.
Facial nerve grading systems.
Laryngoscope.
1983;
93
1056-1069
-
13
Botman J W, Jongkees L B.
The result of infratemporal treatment of facial palsy.
Pract Otorhinolaryngol.
1955;
17
80-100
-
14
House J W, Brackmann D E.
Facial nerve grading system.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1985;
93
146-147
-
15 Pieterson E. Natural history of Bell's palsy. In: Disorders of the Facial Nerve: Anatomy, Diagnosis and Management. New York; Raven Press 1982: 307-312
-
16
Adour K K, Swanson Jr P J.
Facial paralysis in 403 consecutive patients: emphasis on treatment response in patients with Bell's palsy.
Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol.
1971;
75
1284-1301
-
17
Janssen F P.
Over de postoperative facialis-velamina.
, Thesis, University of Amsterdam, 1963. Cited in House JW
Facial nerve grading systems.
Laryngoscope.
1983;
93
1056-1069
-
18 Yanagihara N. Grading of facial palsy. In: Fisch U Facial nerve surgery. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery; Zurich; 1976. pp 533-535 Birmingham; Aesculapius Publishing Company 1977
-
19 Stennert E. Facial nerve paralysis scoring system. In: Facial Nerve Surgery. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery; Zurich; 1976. pp 543-547 Birmingham; Aesculapius Publishing Company 1977
-
20
Brackmann D E, Barrs D M.
Assessing recovery of facial function following acoustic neuroma surgery.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1984;
92
88-93
-
21
Kang T S, Vrabec J T, Giddings N, Terris D J.
Facial nerve grading systems (1985-2002): beyond the House-Brackmann scale.
Otol Neurotol.
2002;
23
767-771
-
22
Yen T L, Driscoll C L, Lalwani A K.
Significance of House-Brackmann facial nerve grading global score in the setting of differential facial nerve function.
Otol Neurotol.
2003;
24
118-122
-
23
King T T, Sparrow O C, Arias J M, O'Connor A F.
Repair of facial nerve after removal of cerebellopontine angle tumors: a comparative study.
J Neurosurg.
1993;
78
720-725
-
24
Lewis B I, Adour K K.
An analysis of the Adour-Swanson and House-Brackmann grading systems for facial nerve recovery.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol.
1995;
252
265-269
-
25
Smith I M, Murray J A, Cull R E, Slattery J.
A comparison of facial grading systems.
Clin Otolaryngol.
1992;
17
303-307
-
26
Burres S, Fisch U.
The comparison of facial grading systems.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1986;
112
755-758
-
27
Murty G E, Diver J P, Kelly P J, O'Donoghue G M, Bradley P J.
The Nottingham system: objective assessment of facial nerve function in the clinic.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1994;
110
156-161
-
28
Ross B G, Fradet G, Nedzelski J M.
Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1996;
114
380-386
-
29
Johnson P C, Brown H, Kuzon Jr W M, Balliet R, Garrison J L, Campbell J.
Simultaneous quantitation of facial movements: the maximal static response assay of facial nerve function.
Ann Plast Surg.
1994;
32
171-179
-
30
Wood D A, Hughes G B, Secic M, Good T L.
Objective measurement of normal facial movement with video microscaling.
Am J Otol.
1994;
15
61-65
-
31
Helling T D, Neely J G.
Validation of objective measures for facial paralysis.
Laryngoscope.
1997;
107
1345-1349
-
32
Moran C J, Neely J G.
Patterns of facial nerve synkinesis.
Laryngoscope.
1996;
106
1491-1496
-
33
Neely J G, Cheung J Y, Wood M, Byers J, Rogerson A.
Computerized quantitative dynamic analysis of facial motion in the paralyzed and synkinetic face.
Am J Otol.
1992;
13
97-107
-
34
Neely J G, Jekel J F, Cheung J Y.
Variations in maximum amplitude of facial expressions between and within normal subjects.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1994;
110
60-63
-
35
Neely J G, Joaquin A H, Kohn L A, Cheung J Y.
Quantitative assessment of the variation within grades of facial paralysis.
Laryngoscope.
1996;
106
438-442
-
36
Meier-Gallati V, Scriba H, Fisch U.
Objective scaling of facial nerve function based on area analysis (OSCAR).
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1998;
118
545-550
-
37
Scriba H, Stoeckli S J, Veraguth D, Pollak A, Fisch U.
Objective evaluation of normal facial function.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol.
1999;
108
641-644
-
38
Isono M, Murata K, Tanaka H, Kawamoto M, Azuma H.
An objective evaluation method for facial mimic motion.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1996;
114
27-31
-
39
Linstrom C J, Silverman C A, Susman W M.
Facial-motion analysis with a video and computer system: a preliminary report.
Am J Otol.
2000;
21
123-129
-
40
Linstrom C J, Silverman C A, Colson D.
Facial motion analysis with a video and computer system after treatment of acoustic neuroma.
Otol Neurotol.
2002;
23
572-579
-
41
Linstrom C J.
Objective facial motion analysis in patients with facial nerve dysfunction.
Laryngoscope.
2002;
112
1129-1147
-
42
Scheirman G L, Cheetham P J.
Motion measurement using the PEAK Performance Technologies system.
Soc Photo-optical Instrument Engin Proceed.
1990;
1356
63-70
-
43
Scholz J P, Milford J P.
Accuracy and precision of the PEAK Performance Technologies motion measurement system.
J Mot Behav.
1993;
25
2-7
-
44
Frey M, Giovanoli P, Gerber H, Slameczka M, Stussi E.
Three-dimensional video analysis of facial movements: a new method to assess the quantity and quality of the smile.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1999;
104
2032-2039
-
45
Giovanoli P, Tzou C H, Ploner M, Frey M.
Three-dimensional video-analysis of facial movements in healthy volunteers.
Br J Plast Surg.
2003;
56
644-652
-
46
Inokuchi I.
Quantitative assessment of facial palsy by moiré topography [in Japanese].
Nippon Jibi Inkoka Gakkai Kaiho.
1992;
95
715-725
-
47
Karlan M S.
Contour analysis in plastic and reconstructive surgery.
Arch Otolaryngol.
1979;
105
670-679
-
48
Ekman P.
Measuring facial movement.
Environ Psych Nonverbal Behav.
1976;
1
56-75
-
49 Ekman P, Friesen W V. Facial action coding system: a technique for the measurement of facial movement. In: Investigator's Guide. Palo Alto, CA; Consulting Psychologists Press 1978: 1-42
-
50
Donato G SBM, Hager J C, Ekman P, Sejnowski T J.
Classifying facial actions.
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell.
1999;
21
974-989
-
51
Cohn J F, Zlochower A J, Lien J, Kanade T.
Automated face analysis by feature point tracking has high concurrent validity with manual FACS coding.
Psychophysiology.
1999;
36
35-43
-
52
Schmidt K L, Cohn J F, Tian Y.
Signal characteristics of spontaneous facial expressions: automatic movements in solitary and social smiles.
Biol Psychol.
2003;
65
49-66
-
53
Caribom I, Hsu W M, Klinker G et al..
Modeling and analysis of empirical data in collaborative environments.
Commun ACM.
1992;
35
76-84
-
54
Mase K.
Recognition of facial expression from optical flow.
IEICE Trans.
1991;
74
3474-3483
-
55
Terzopoulos D, Waters K.
Analysis and synthesis of facial image sequence using physical and anatomical models.
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell.
1993;
15
569-579
-
56
Vannier M W, Pilgram T K, Bhatia G, Brunsden B, Commean P.
Facial surface scanner.
IEEE Comput Graphics Appl.
1991;
11
72-80
-
57
Vannier M W, Marsh J L.
Craniofacial imaging: principles and applications of three-dimensional imaging.
Lippincott's Rev Radiol.
1992;
1
193-209
-
58
Vannier M W, Bhatia G, Commean P, Pilgram T K, Brunsden B.
Medical facial surface scanner.
SPIE.
1992;
1653
177-184
-
59
Vannier M W, Pilgram T K, Bhatia G, Brunsden B, Nemecek J R, Young V L.
Quantitative three-dimensional assessment of face-lift with an optical facial surface scanner.
Ann Plast Surg.
1993;
30
204-211
-
60
Croxson G, May M, Mester S J.
Grading facial nerve function: House-Brackmann versus Burres-Fisch methods.
Am J Otol.
1990;
11
240-246
-
61
Frey M, Jenny A, Giovanoli P, Stussi E.
Development of a new documentation system for facial movements as a basis for the international registry for neuromuscular reconstruction in the face.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1994;
93
1334-1349
-
62
Rickenmann J, Jaquenod C, Cerenko D, Fisch U.
Comparative value of facial nerve grading systems.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1997;
117
322-325
-
63
Smith I M, Murray J A, Cull R E, Slattery J.
Facial weakness. A comparison of clinical and photographic methods of observation.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1991;
117
906-909
J. Gail NeelyM.D.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine
660 South Euclid Avenue, Box 8115
St. Louis, MO 63110
