Short-Term and Long-Term Results of Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Achalasia: 12 Years’ Experience

Background and Study Aims: This retrospective study reports 12 years’ experience with pneumatic dilation treatment in patients with achalasia and attempts to define factors capable of predicting failure of endoscopic dilation.
Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with achalasia who received endoscopic balloon dilation were studied retrospectively. Repeat dilation was carried out if dysphagia persisted or recurred. A structured symptom score questionnaire (the Eckardt score) was conducted by phone with patients who had received dilation and had been followed up for more than 2 years. Failure was defined as the presence of significant dysphagic symptoms after more than two repeat dilations. Data for the first 2 years (short-term) and for the subsequent follow-up (long-term) were analyzed.
Results: From 1989 to 2001, 66 patients underwent endoscopic balloon dilation for achalasia; three perforations (4.5 %) occurred, with no mortalities. Dysphagic symptoms significantly improved 12 weeks after the procedure (P < 0.05). Fourteen patients (20 %) required a second dilation procedure within a median of 7 months (range 1 - 52 months), and 13 of them underwent repeat dilations within the first 2 years. Five patients (7.5 %) required further surgical or endoscopic therapy. Fifty-eight patients received pneumatic dilation for more than 2 years; 32 (55 %) responded to the questionnaire. The mean dysphagia score was 1.7 (SD 1.2), with only five patients (16 %) having significant dysphagic symptoms during a median follow-up period of 55 months (range 26 - 130 months). The cumulative success rates for pneumatic dilation after 5 and 19 years were 74 % and 62 %, respectively. Cox regression analysis identified small balloon size (30 mm) as the only significant factor capable of predicting failure of endoscopic dilation (P = 0.009; relative risk 5.3; 95 % confidence interval, 1.7 to 40.9).
Conclusions: Endoscopic balloon dilation is an effective treatment for achalasia, with minimal morbidity (60 % experience long-term benefit).

• 1 Patti M G, Fisichella P M, Perretta S. et al . Impact of minimally invasive surgery on the treatment of esophageal achalasia: a decade of change.  J Am Coll Surg. 2003;  196 698-703
• 2 West R L, Hirsch D P, Bartelsman J F. et al . Long-term results of pneumatic dilation in achalasia followed for more than 5 years.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1346-1351
• 3 Katz P O, Gilbert J, Castell D O. Pneumatic dilatation is effective long-term treatment for achalasia.  Dig Dis Sci. 1998;  43 1973-1977
• 4 Eckardt V F, Aignherr C, Bernhard G. Predictors of outcome in patients with achalasia treated by pneumatic dilation.  Gastroenterology. 1992;  103 1732-1738
• 5 Vaezi M F, Richter J E. Current therapies for achalasia: comparison and efficacy.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998;  27 21-35
• 6 Vaezi M F, Richter J E. Diagnosis and management of achalasia.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 3406-3412
• 7 Muehldorfer S M, Hahn E G, Ell C. High- and low-compliance balloon dilators in patients with achalasia: a randomized prospective comparative trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 398-403
• 8 Gideon R M, Castell D O, Yarze J. Prospective randomized comparison of pneumatic dilatation technique in patients with idiopathic achalasia.  Dig Dis Sci. 1999;  44 1853-1857
• 9 Bittinger M, Wienbeck M. Pneumatic dilation in achalasia.  Can J Gastroenterol. 2001;  5 195-199
• 10 Seelig M H, DeVault K R, Seelig S K. et al . Treatment of achalasia: recent advances in surgery.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1999;  28 202-207
• 11 Kadakia S C, Wong R K. Pneumatic balloon dilation for esophageal achalasia.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2001;  11 325-346
• 12 Vaezi M F, Baker M E, Achkar E, Richter J E. Timed barium esophagram: better predictor of long-term success after pneumatic dilation in achalasia than symptom assessment.  Gut. 2002;  50 765-770
• 13 Vantrappen G, Hellemans J, Vandenbroucke J. et al . Treatment of achalasia with pneumatic dilatations.  Gut. 1971;  12 268-275
• 14 Kim H C, Cameron A J, Zinsmeisteer A R. Prospective evaluation of relationship between lower esophageal sphincter pressure, esophageal transit and esophageal diameter and symptoms in response to pneumatic dilatation.  Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;  68 1067-1073
• 15 Penagini R, Cantu P, Mangano M. et al . Long-term effects of pneumatic dilatation on symptoms and lower esophageal sphincter pressure in achalasia.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;  4 380-384