Zusammenfassung
Eine prospektive Untersuchung verglich jeweils 50 Patienten mit einer Impingement-Symptomatik und schultergesunde Probanden hinsichtlich ihrer BWS-Beweglichkeit. Aufgrund auffälliger Ergebnisdifferenzen erfolgte die Aufteilung der Impingement-Patienten in 2 Gruppen, von denen die eine 27 Patienten mit lediglich Impingement-Syndrom und die andere Patienten mit der Zusatzdiagnose Tendinosis calcarea umfasste. Beide Gruppen wurden jeweils mit den schultergesunden Probanden verglichen. Die Beweglichkeit in allen 3 Ebenen unterschied sich signifikant zwischen den 3 Gruppen. Der Unterschied zeigte sich besonders deutlich bezüglich der Bewegungen in der Transversalebene (Rotation). Die geringste Beweglichkeit wiesen die Patienten mit Impingement-Syndrom ohne Tendinosis calcarea, die größte die Gesunden auf.
Abstract
A prospective study compared the mobility of the thoracic spine of 50 patients with shoulder impingement symptoms with subjects with healthy shoulders. Due to obvious differences in the results the impingement patients were divided into 2 groups, one of which included 27 patients with impingement syndrome only and the other with the additional diagnosis of tendinosis calcarea. Both groups were compared with the healthy shoulder group. Mobility in all 3 planes differed significantly between the 3 groups. The difference was particularly clear in mobility in the transverse plane (rotation). The smallest range of motion was found in the patients with impingement syndrome without tendinosis calcarea, the highest in the healthy subjects.
Schlüsselwörter
Impingement-Syndrom - BWS-Beweglichkeit - Plurimeter - Plurikompass
Key words
Impingement syndrome - thoracic spine mobility - plurimeter - pluricompass
Literatur
1
Altchek D W, Warren R F, Wickiewitz T L. et al .
Arthroskopic Acromioplasty. Technique and Results.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1990;
72A
1198-1207
2
Andriacchi T, Schultz A, Belytschko T. et al .
A Model for Studies of Mechanical Interactions between the Human Spine and Rib Cage.
Journal of Biomechanics.
1976;
7
497-507
3
Anetzberger H, Putz R.
Die Morphometrie des subacromialen Raums und ihre klinische Relevanz.
Unfallchirurg.
1995;
98
407-414
4
Beltran J.
The use of magnetic resonance imaging about the shoulder.
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.
1993;
1
321-332
5 Benninghoff M. Makroskopische und mikroskopische Anatomie des Menschen. Bd. 1. München; Urban & Schwarzenberg 1985
6 Betz U. Hypermobilität und Instabilität. Hüter-Becker A Lehrbuch zum neuen Denkmodell in der Physiotherapie. Bd. 1: Bewegungssystem Stuttgart; Thieme 2002
7
Bigliani L U, Levine W N.
Current Concepts Review Subacromial Impingement Syndrome.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am.
1997;
79
1854-1868
8
Birnbaum K, Lierse W.
Anatomy and Function of the Bursa subacromialis.
Acta Anatomica.
1992;
145
354-363
9
Brooks C H, Revell W J, Heatley F W.
A Quantitative Histological Study of the Vascularity of the Rotator Cuff Tendon.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1992;
74B
151-153
10
Altchek D W, Warren R F, Wickiewitz T L. et al .
Arthroskopic Acromioplasty. Technique and Results.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1990;
72A
1198-1207
11
Charles A, Lyons F R.
Shoulder Impingementsyndrome: Diagnosis, Radiographic Evaluation, and Treatment with a Modified Neer Acromioplasty.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1993;
75A
409-424
12
Chen S K, Simonian P T, Wickiewitz T L. et al .
Radiographic evaluation of glenohumeral kinematics: A muscle fatigue model.
The Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.
1999;
8
49-52
13 Van Cochrane G. Orthopädische Biomechanik. Stuttgart; Enke 1988
14
Dvorak J, Panjabi M, Chang B S. et al .
Functional Radiographic Diagnosis of the Lumbar Spine.
Spine.
1991;
16
562-571
15
Ellman H, Kay S P.
Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression for Chronic Impingement.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1991;
73B
16
Ensink F B, Saur P, Frese K. et al .
Lumbar Range of Motion: Influence of Time of Day and Individual Factors on Measurements.
Spine.
1996;
21
1339-1343
17
Fairbank J, Davies J B, Couper J. et al .
The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire.
Physiotherapy.
1980;
66
271-273
18
Freedman L, Munro R R.
Abduction of the Arm in the Scapular Plane: Scapular and Glenohumeral Movements.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1966;
48A
1503-1510
19
Fu F H, Harner C D, Klein A H.
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome. A Critical Review.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
1991;
269
162-173
20 Gerhardt J J, Rippstein J. Gelenk und Bewegung. Bern; Huber 1992
21
Gold R H, Seeger L L, Yao L.
Imaging shoulder impingement.
Skeletal Radiol.
1993;
22
555-561
22
Greenfield B, Catlin P A, Coats P W. et al .
Posture in Patients with Shoulder Overuse Injuries and Healthy Individuals.
Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy.
1995;
21
287-295
23
Gregersen G G, Lucas D B.
An In Vivo Study of the Axial Rotation of the Thoracolumbar Spine.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1967;
49A
247-262
24 Habermeyer P, Schweiberer L. Schulterchirurgie. München; Urban & Schwarzenberg 1996
25
Hedtmann A, Heers G, Heidersdorf S.
Bildgebende Verfahren an der Schulter.
Arthroskopie.
2001;
2
74-93
26 Heel C h. Verminderte Bewegungsqualität. Hüter-Becker A Lehrbuch zum neuen Denkmodell in der Physiotherapie. Bd. 1: Bewegungssystem Stuttgart; Thieme 2002
27 Heine J. Die Lumbalskoliose. Stuttgart; Enke 1980
28 Hochschild J. Strukturen und Funktionen begreifen. Funktionelle Anatomie - Therapierelevante Details. Bd. 1: Grundlagen zur Wirbelsäule, HWS und Schädel, BWS und Brustkorb, obere Extremität. 2. Aufl. Stuttgart; Thieme 2002
29
Inman V T, Saunders M, Abbot L C.
Observations on the function of the shoulder joint.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1948;
26
1-30
30
Jerosch J, Castro W H, Sons H U. et al .
Etiology of sub-acromial impingement syndrome - a biomechanical study.
Beitr Orthop Traumatol.
1989;
36
411-418
31 Kapandji I A. Funktionelle Anatomie der Gelenke. Bd. 1. 2. Aufl. Stuttgart; Enke 1992
32 Kapandji I A. Funktionelle Anatomie der Gelenke. Bd. 3. 2. Aufl. Stuttgart; Enke 1992
33
Charles A, Lyons F R.
Shoulder Impingementsyndrome: Diagnosis, Radiographic Evaluation, and Treatment with a Modified Neer Acromioplasty.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1993;
75A
409-424
34
Kenn W, Hufnagel P, Müller Th. et al .
Arthrographie, Ultraschall und MRT bei Rotatorenmanschettenläsionen - ein Methodenvergleich bei Partialläsionen und bei kleinen kompletten Rupturen.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2000;
172
260-266
35 Koslowski L, Bushe K A, Junginger T. et al .Die Chirurgie. 4. Aufl. Stuttgart; Schattauer 1999
36 Krämer K L, Maichl F P. Scores, Bewertungsschemata und Klassifikationen in Orthopädie und Traumatologie. Stuttgart; Thieme 1993
37
Lazarus M D, Chansky H A, Misra S. et al .
Comparison of open and arthroskopic subacromial decompression.
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.
1994;
3
1-11
38
Leroux J L, Codine P, Thomas E. et al .
Isokinetic Evaluation of Rotational Strength in Normal Shoulders and Shoulders with Impingement Syndrome.
Clin Orthopaedics and Related Research.
1994;
304
108-115
39
Lohr J F, Uhthoff H K.
The Microvascular Pattern of the Supraspinatus Tendon.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
1990;
254
35-38
40
Miller S A, Mayer T, Cox R. et al .
Reliability problems associated with the modified Schober technique for true lumbar flexion measurement.
Spine.
1992;
17
345-348
41
Misamore G W, Woodward C.
Evaluation of Degenerative Lesions of the Rotator Cuff. A Comparison of Arthrography and Ultrasonography.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1991;
73A
704-706
42
Morrison D P, Frogameni A D, Woodworth P.
Non-operative Treatment of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1997;
79A
732-737
43
Moseley F, Goldie I.
The Arterial Pattern of the Rotator Cuff of the Shoulder.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1963;
45B
780-789
44
Neer C S.
Anterior Acromioplasty for the Chronic Impingement Syndrome of the Shoulder. A Preliminary Report.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1972;
54A
41-50
45
Neer C S.
Impingement Lesions.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
1983;
173
70-77
46
Nelson M C, Leather G P, Nirschl R P. et al .
Evaluation of the Painful Shoulder. A Prospective Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Computerized Tomographic Arthrography, Ultrasonography, and Operative Findings.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1991;
73A
707-716
47
Neviaser R J, Neviaser T J.
Observations on Impingement.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
1990;
254
60-63
48
Nicholson G.
Rehabilitation of Common Shoulder Injuries.
Clinics in Sports Medicine.
1989;
8
49 Niethard F U, Pfeil J. Orthopädie. Duale Reihe. 2. Aufl. Stuttgart; Hippokrates 1992
50
Panjabi M, Chang D, Dvorak J.
An Analysis of Errors in Kinematic Parameters Associated with In Vivo Functional Radiographs.
Spine.
1992;
17
200-205
51
Poppen N K, Walker P S.
Normal and Abnormal Motion of the Shoulder.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1976;
58A
195-201
52
Rathburn J B, Macnab I.
The Microvascularity of the Rotator Cuff.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
1970;
52B
540-553
53
Rippstein J.
Der Plurikompass und seine Bestandteile [unveröffentlicht].
54 Rockwood I, Lyons F, Matsen F A. The Shoulder. Philadelphia; Saunders 1993
55
Rondinelli R, Murphy J, Esler A. et al .
Estimation of Normal Lumbar Flexion with Surface Inclinomerty. A Comparison of Three Methods.
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.
1992;
71
219-224
56
Samo D G, Chen S P, Crampton A R. et al .
Validity of Three Lumbar Sagital Motion Measurement Methods: Surface Inclinometers Compared with Radiographs.
Journal of Occupational Environmental Medicine.
1997;
39
209-216
57
Saur P M, Ensinck F, Bernhard M. et al .
Lumbar Range of Motion: Reliability and Validity of the Inclinometer Technique in the Clinical Measurement of Trunk Flexibilty.
Spine.
1996;
21
1332-1338
58
Solem-Bertofft E, Thuomas K A, Westerberg C E.
The Influence of Scapular Retraction and Protraction on the Width of the Subacromial Space.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
1993;
296
99-103
59
Voutsinas S A, MacEwen D G.
Sagital Profiles of the Spine.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
1986;
210
235-242
60 White A A, Pandjabi M M. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2nd. ed. Philadelphia; Lippincott 1990
61
Williams R, Binkley J, Bloch R. et al .
Reliability of the Modified-Modified Schober and Double Inclinometer Methods for Measuring Lumbar Flexion and Extension.
Physical Therapy.
1993;
73
26-37
62
Wülker N, Plitz W, Roetman B.
Biomechanical Data Concerning the Shoulder Impingement Syndrome.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
1994;
303
242-249
1 Die Ergebnisse der Studie wurden erstveröffentlicht in: Zorthop. 2004; 142: 1 - 6. Der hier vorliegende Beitrag beschreibt die Studiendurchführung im Einzelnen. Die Arbeit erfolgte mit freundlicher Unterstützung durch Dr. J. Rippstein, La Conversion, Schweiz.
Ulrich Betz, PT
Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Abt. Physiotherapie
Langenbeckstr. 1
D-55131 Mainz
Email: betz@mail.uni-mainz.de