Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000121.xml
Orthopedic Trauma Directions 2005; 3(1): 1-5
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-864192
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-864192
Three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures
Operative versus nonoperative treatmentFurther Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
22 February 2005 (online)

Summary
Results from three recent studies were inconsistent with respect to treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. The one randomized controlled trial found no difference in overall functional or clinical outcome between conservative and surgical treatment. Small sample sizes and subsequent lack of power to detect a difference between treatments was problematic in all studies. Selection bias was present in both cohort studies. Larger, randomized studies are needed to further elucidate whether there is a difference between treatments in terms of functional outcome.

Strength of evidence | Average methods score (out of 10)