References
1a
Nicolaou KC.
Mitchell HJ.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2001,
40:
1576
1b
Nicolaou KC.
Boddy CNC.
Bräse S.
Winssinger N.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
1999,
38:
2096
1c
Weymouth-Wilson AC.
Nat. Prod. Rep.
1997,
14:
99
2
Hauser FM.
Ellenberger SR.
Chem. Rev.
1986,
86:
35
3
Findlay JA.
Liu J.-S.
Radics L.
Rakhit S.
Can. J. Chem.
1981,
59:
3018
4
Futagami S.
Ohashi Y.
Imura K.
Hosoya T.
Ohmori K.
Matsumoto T.
Suzuki K.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2000,
41:
1063
5
Ben A.
Yamauchi T.
Matsumoto T.
Suzuki K.
Synlett
2004,
225
6
Arai M.
Tomoda H.
Matsumoto M.
Takahashi Y.
Woodruff BH.
Ishiguro N.
Kobayashi S.
Omura S.
J. Antibiot.
2001,
54:
554
7a
Itoh T.
Kinoshita M.
Aoki S.
Kobayashi M.
J. Nat. Prod.
2003,
66:
1373
7b The absolute stereostructure of the sugar portion of komodoquinone A has not been established.
8
Binkley RW.
Goewey GS.
Johnston JC.
J. Org. Chem.
1984,
49:
992
9
Lindhorst TK.
Thiem J.
Liebigs Ann. Chem.
1990,
1237
10 Guo and coworkers studied exactly the same system, noting qualitatively the difference in the reactivities of 8 and 9 for DIBAL reduction and also suggested the solution by employing BF3·OEt2. Unfortunately, the exact conclusion could not be drawn from their data, because they used the α/β-anomeric mixture of methyl glycoside. See: Guo Z.-W.
Deng S.-T.
Hui Y.-Z.
J. Carbohydr. Chem.
1996.
15:
p.965
11
Bundle DR.
Josephson S.
Can. J. Chem.
1978,
56:
2686
12
Gauthier DR.
Szumigala RH.
Armstrong JD.
Volante RP.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2001,
42:
7011
13 To a stirred solution of 9 (356 mg, 1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) at 0 °C was added BF3·OEt2 (0.25 mL, 2 mmol). After stirring for 5 min, the reaction was quenched with sat. aq NaHCO3 solution. The mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2, and the combined organic extracts were washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated. The 1H NMR indicated that the ratio of 8 and 9 was about 2:1.
14
Frigerio M.
Santagostino M.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1994,
35:
8019
15
Brünker H.-G.
Adam W.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995,
117:
3976
16
Yamaura M.
Noguchi M.
Umemura K.
Yoshimura J.
Kidorui
1993,
22:
54
17
Molander GA.
Org. React.
1994,
46:
211
18 Compound 18: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.40-7.26 (m, 10 H), 4.86 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.78 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.64-4.56 (m, 3 H), 4.07 (dd, J = 3.7, 11.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.85 (br q, J = 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.62 (br d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.33 (s, 3 H), 3.00 (dd, J = 2.9, 11.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.59 (s, 6 H), 1.13 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 138.2 (C), 138.1 (C), 128.2 (CH), 128.1 (CH), 128.0 (CH), 127.9 (CH), 127.5 (CH), 127.4 (CH), 97.2 (CH), 82.9 (CH), 75.2 (CH2), 75.1 (CH), 71.1 (CH2), 66.8 (CH), 61.4 (CH), 54.9 (CH3), 43.5 (CH3), 16.3 (CH3). IR (neat): 3030, 2931, 2895, 1454, 1099, 1053, 733, 696 cm-1.
19
Alper PB.
Hung S.-C.
Wong C.-H.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1996,
37:
6029