Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2005; 7(4): 411-416
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-865619
Research Paper

Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart KG · New York

The Pollination of Bromelia antiacantha (Bromeliaceae) in Southeastern Brazil: Ornithophilous versus Melittophilous Features

M. B. F. Canela1 , M. Sazima1
  • 1Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Caixa Postal 6109, 13083-970 Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil
Further Information

Publication History

Received: July 13, 2004

Accepted: March 23, 2005

Publication Date:
25 May 2005 (online)

Abstract

Bromelia antiacantha flowered from December to February and during this period the central leaves and bracts displayed a bright red colour. The inflorescence bears 150 - 350 flowers, with 10 - 35 flowers opening per day over 4 - 5 days. The flowers are dark magenta coloured with white margins, tubular-shaped with a wide opening, and their stigma is situated below the anthers. Anthesis began around 4:00 h and flowers lasted approximately 15 h. The highest nectar volume and sugar concentration occurred between 4:00 - 6:00 h; after this period, both decreased throughout the day. B. antiacantha is partially self-incompatible, non-autogamous, and therefore, pollinator dependent. The hummingbirds Thalurania glaucopis, Amazilia fimbriata, and Ramphodon naevius were its most frequent pollinators (55 % of the visits), visiting flowers mainly in the afternoon. The scattered distribution of B. antiacantha promoted trap-lining behaviour of the hummingbirds, which favoured fruit set through xenogamy. Corolla colour, wide flower opening, sweet odour and concentrated nectar early in the day favoured bee visitation. Of the 38 % of bee visits, 96 % were made by Bombus morio, mainly in the morning and their behaviour promoted self-pollination. The bee Trigona spinipes frequently acted as a pollen and nectar thief early in the morning, excluding most of the hummingbirds. Bromelia antiacantha has ornithophilous and melittophilous features, and despite being pollinated by two kinds of agents, its reproductive success depends on a given set of circumstances.

References

  • 1 Araújo A. C., Fischer E. A., Sazima M.. Floração seqüencial e polinização de três espécies de Vriesea (Bromeliaceae) na região da Juréia, sudeste do Brasil.  Revista Brasileira de Botânica. (1994);  17 113-118
  • 2 Araújo A. C., Fischer E. A., Sazima M.. As bromélias na região do Rio Verde. Marques, O. A. V. and Duleba, W., eds. Estação Ecológica Juréia-Itatins. Ambiente Físico, Flora e Fauna. São Paulo; Holos Editora (2004): 162-171
  • 3 Barros M. G.. Pollination ecology of Tabebuia aurea (Manso) Benth. and Hook. and T. ochracea (Cham.) Standl. (Bignoniaceae) in Central Brazil cerrado vegetation.  Revista Brasileira de Botânica. (2001);  24 255-256
  • 4 Benzing D. H.. Bromeliaceae: Profile of an Adaptive Radiation. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press. (2000): 79-281
  • 5 Buzato S., Sazima M., Sazima I.. Hummingbird-pollinated floras at three Atlantic Forest sites.  Biotropica. (2000);  32 824-841
  • 6 Canela M. B. F., Sazima M.. Aechmea pectinata: a hummingbird-dependent bromeliad with inconspicuous flowers from the rainforest in southeastern Brazil.  Annals of Botany. (2003);  92 731-737
  • 7 Dafni A.. Pollination Ecology: A Practical Approach. Oxford; IRL Press at Oxford University Press (1992)
  • 8 Faegri K., van der Pijl L.. The Principles of Pollination Ecology. New York; Pergamon Press (1980)
  • 9 Feinsinger P.. Organization of a tropical guild of nectarivorous birds.  Ecological Monographs. (1976);  46 257-291
  • 10 Feinsinger P.. Ecological interactions between plants and hummingbirds in a successional tropical community.  Ecological Monographs. (1978);  48 269-287
  • 11 Feinsinger P., Colwell R. K.. Community organization among neotropical nectar-feeding birds.  American Zoology. (1978);  18 779-795
  • 12 Gentry A. H.. Flowering phenology and diversity in tropical Bignoniaceae.  Biotropica. (1974);  6 64-68
  • 13 Kessler M., Krömer T.. Patterns and ecological correlates of pollination modes among bromeliad communities of Andean Forests in Bolivia.  Plant Biology. (2000);  2 659-669
  • 14 Lloyd D. G.. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The section of self-fertilization.  International Journal of Plant Sciences. (1992);  153 370-380
  • 15 Lloyd D. G., Schoen D. J.. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions.  International Journal of Plant Sciences. (1992);  153 358-369
  • 16 Locatelli E., Machado I. C.. Comparative study of the floral biology in the ornithophilous species of Cactaceae: Melocactus zehntneri and Opuntia palmadora. .  Bradleya. (1999);  17 75-85
  • 17 Martin F. N.. Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence.  Stain Technology. (1959);  34 125-128
  • 18 Martinelli G.. Biologia reprodutiva de Bromeliaceae na Reserva Ecológica de Macaé de Cima. Lima, H. C. and Guedes-Bruni, R, R., eds. Serra de Macaé de Cima: Diversidade Florística e Conservação em Mata Atlântica. Rio de Janeiro; IP/JBRJ (1997): 213-250
  • 19 Murray B. G.. Heterostyly and pollen-tube interactions in Luculia gratissima (Rubiaceae).  Annals of Botany. (1990);  65 691-698
  • 20 Neill D. A.. Trapliners in the trees: hummingbird pollination of Erythrina. .  Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. (1987);  74 27-41
  • 21 Newstrom L. E., Frankie G. W., Baker H. G.. A new classification for plant phenology based on flowering patterns in lowland tropical rain forest trees at La Selva, Costa Rica.  Biotropica. (1994);  26 141-159
  • 22 Piratelli A. J.. Comportamento alimentar de beija-flores em duas espécies de Hippeastrum (Amaryllidaceae).  Revista Brasileira de Biologia. (1997);  57 261-273
  • 23 Radford A. E., Dickinson W. C., Massey J. R., Bell C. R.. Vascular Plant Systematics. New York; Harper and Row (1974)
  • 24 Ramirez N., Gil C., Hokche O., Seres A., Brito Y.. Biologia floral de una comunidad arbustiva tropical en la Guayana Venezolana.  Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. (1990);  77 383-397
  • 25 Renner S.. The widespread occurrence of anther destruction by Trigona bees in Melastomataceae.  Biotropica. (1983);  15 251-256
  • 26 Roubik D. W.. Ecology and Natural History of Tropical Bees. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press (1989): 138-160
  • 27 Ruschi A.. Beija-flores do Estado do Espírito Santo. São Paulo; Editora Rios (1982): 263
  • 28 Sazima I., Sazima M.. Mamangavas e irapuás (Apoidea): visitas, interações e conseqüências para a polinização do maracujá (Passifloraceae).  Revista Brasileira de Entomologia. (1989);  33 109-118
  • 29 Sazima I., Vogel S., Sazima M.. Bat pollination of Encholirium glaziovii, a terrestrial bromeliad.  Plant Systematics and Evolution. (1989);  168 167-179
  • 30 Sazima I., Buzato S., Sazima M.. An assemblage of hummingbird-pollinated flowers in a montane forest in southeastern Brazil.  Botanica Acta. (1996);  109 149-160
  • 31 Sazima M., Buzato S., Sazima I.. Polinização por beija-flores em Nidularium e gêneros relacionados. Leme, E. C., ed. Bromélias da Mata Atlântica - Nidularium Hamburg. Rio de Janeiro; Donnelley Gráfica Editora Ltda (2000): 190 -195
  • 32 Siqueira J. A. F.. Biologia floral of Hohenbergia ridleyi (Baker) Mez.  Bromélia. (1998);  5 3-13
  • 33 Sluys M. V., Cardozo C. A., Mangolin R., Rocha C. F. D.. Taxas de visitação de polinizadores a Vriesea procera (Bromeliaceae) na Ilha Grande/RJ, sudeste do Brasil.  Bromélia. (2001);  6 19-24
  • 34 Sluys M. V., Stotz D. F.. Padrões de visitação a Vriesea neoglutinosa por beija-flores no Espírito Santo, sudeste do Brasil.  Bromélia. (1995);  2 27-35
  • 35 Smith L. B., Downs R. J.. Bromelioideae (Bromeliaceae). Flora Neotropica 14, Part 3. New York; The New York Botanical Garden, Hafner Press (1979): 1658-1660
  • 36 Snow D. W., Snow B. K.. Feeding ecology of hummingbirds in the Serra do Mar, southeastern Brazil.  El Hornero. (1986);  12 286-296
  • 37 Stiles F. G.. Geographical aspects of bird-flower coevolution, with particular reference to Central America.  Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. (1981);  68 323-351
  • 38 Vogel S.. Ecophysiology of zoophilic pollination. Lange, O. L., Nobel, P. S., Osmond, C. B., and Ziegler, H., eds. Physiology and Plant Ecology III. Berlin; Springer-Verlag (1983): 560-624
  • 39 Vogel S.. Radiación adaptativa del síndrome floral en las familias neotropicales.  Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias (Cordoba). (1990);  59 5-14
  • 40 Wendt T., Canela M. B. F., Faria A. P. G., Rios R. I.. Reproductive biology and natural hybridization between two endemic species of Pitcairnia (Bromeliaceae).  American Journal of Botany. (2001);  88 1760-1767
  • 41 Wendt T., Canela M. B. F., Klein D. E., Rios R. I.. Selfing facilitates reproductive isolation among three sympatric species of Pitcairnia (Bromeliaceae).  Plant Systematics and Evolution. (2002);  232 201-212
  • 42 Wolf L. L.. The impact of seasonal flowering in the biology of some tropical hummingbirds.  Condor. (1970);  72 1-14
  • 43 Wolf L. L., Stiles F. G., Hainsworth F. R.. Ecological organization of a tropical highland hummingbird community.  Journal of Animal Ecology. (1976);  32 349-379
  • 44 Wolff D., Braun M., Liede S.. Nocturnal versus diurnal pollination success in Isertia laevis (Rubiaceae): a sphingophilous plant visited by hummingbirds.  Plant Biology. (2003);  5 71-78
  • 45 Zeisler M.. Über die Abgrenzung der eigentlichen Narbenfläche mit Hilfe von Reaktionen.  Beihefte zum Botanischen Zentralblatt. (1938);  58 308-318

M. B. F. Canela

Departamento de Botânica
Instituto de Biologia
Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Caixa Postal 6109

13090-970 Campinas, São Paulo

Brasil

Email: betec@hotmail.com

Editor: F. R. Scarano