Bacterial Leaf Nodule Symbiosis in Ardisia (Myrsinaceae): Does it Contribute to Seedling Growth Capacity?

Abstract

Numerous species of Ardisia (shrubs in the Myrsinaceae) possess conspicuous bacterial nodules in their leaf margins. This is an obligate, life-cycle symbiosis: the bacteria are maintained in the bud, and re-infect each new leaf primordium, as well as flowers and seeds, and are transmitted vertically to the next generation. Previous studies have shown that treatments which kill the bacteria in the buds lead to death of the plant. This study is the first to test for a net cost or benefit of the nodules in seedling growth capacity. A net benefit of the symbiosis would be expected from the elaborate nodule structure, and also from evolutionary theory. Seedlings of two symbiotic species (A. crenata and A. virens) and two non-symbiotic species (A. elliptica and A. sieboldii) were grown comparatively. For the symbiotic species, performance was assessed for intact plants, for plants with nodules clipped off, and for control plants in which the lamina was clipped between the nodules. The nodules did not contribute to, or detract from, seedling performance in high resource supply. Although plants increased ca. 4- to 6-fold in dry mass, nodule removal had no significant impact on plant growth, gas exchange, biomass allocation, or on foliar concentrations of chlorophyll or of 11 nutrients. No significant advantage was observed for the two symbiotic species over the two non-symbiotic species. The nodules might contribute to growth capacity during other life stages, during resource shortage, or during exposure to specific herbivores or pathogens.

Endophyte - growth analysis - mutualism - photosynthetic rate - stomatal conductance - vertical transmission.

References

• 1 Bloch R.. Wound healing in higher plants.  Botanical Review. (1952);  7 110-146
• 2 Bray S. R., Kitajima K., Sylvia D. M.. Mycorrhizae differentially alter growth, physiology, and competitive ability of an invasive shrub.  Ecological Applications. (2003);  13 565-574
• 3 Bronstein J. L.. The costs of mutualism.  American Zoologist. (2001);  41 825-839
• 4 Davis M. E., Miller A. R., Lineberger R. D.. Temporal competence for transformation of Lycopersicon esculentum (L. Mill) cotyledons by Agrobacterium tumefaciens: relation to wound healing and soluble plant factors.  Journal of Experimental Botany. (1991);  42 359-364
• 5 De Mazancourt C., Loreau M., Dieckmann U.. Understanding mutualism when there is adaptation to the partner.  Functional Ecology. (2005);  93 305-314
• 6 Faeth S. H.. Are endophytic fungi defensive plant mutualists?.  Oikos. (2002);  98 25-36
• 7 Frank S. A.. Models of symbiosis.  American Naturalist. (1997);  150 S80-S99
• 8 Grubb P. J.. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche.  Biological Reviews. (1977);  52 107-145
• 9 Hoffmann W. A., Poorter H.. Avoiding bias in calculations of relative growth rate.  Annals of Botany. (2002);  90 37-42
• 10 Hofstra J. J., Koch-Bosma T.. Some aspects of the leaf nodule symbiosis in Ardisia crispa. .  Acta Botanica Neerlandica. (1970);  19 665-670
• 11 Isaac R. A., Johnson W. C.. Elemental analysis of plant tissue by plasma emission spectroscopy: collaborative study.  Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (1985);  68 499-505
• 12 Kitajima K.. Relative importance of photosynthetic traits and allocation patterns as correlates of seedling shade tolerance of 13 tropical trees.  Oecologia. (1994);  98 419-428
• 13 Lebard S., Belin-Depoux M.. Structure and ontogeny of foliar bacterial nodules of Ardisia crenata Sims (Myrsinaceae).  Acta Botanica Gallica. (2003);  150 19-33
• 14 Lersten N. R., Horner H. T.. Bacterial leaf nodule symbiosis in angiosperms with emphasis on Rubiaceae and Myrsinaceae.  Botanical Review. (1976);  42 145-214
• 15 Marquard R. D., Tipton J. L.. Relationship between extractable chlorophyll and an in situ method to estimate leaf greenness.  HortScience. (1987);  22 1327
• 16 Miehe H.. Weitere Untersuchungen über die Bakteriensymbiose bei Ardisia crispa. II. Die Pflanze ohne Bakterien.  Jahrbücher für wissenschaftliche Botanik. (1919);  58 29-65
• 17 Miller I. M.. Bacterial leaf nodule symbiosis.  Advances in Botanical Research Incorporating Advances in Plant Pathology. (1990);  17 163-234
• 18 Miller I. M., Gardner I. C., Scott A.. The development of marginal leaf nodules in Ardisia crispa (Thunb.) A. DC. (Myrsinaceae).  Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. (1983);  86 237-252
• 19 Noë R., Hammerstein P.. Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating.  Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. (1994);  35 1-11
• 20 Sack L.. Responses of temperate woody seedlings to shade and drought: do trade-offs limit potential niche differentiation?.  Oikos. (2004);  107 110-127
• 21 Saikkonen K., Wali P., Helander M., Faeth S. H.. Evolution of endophyte-plant symbioses.  Trends in Plant Science. (2004);  9 275-280
• 22 Wagner W. L., Herbst D. R., Sohmer S. H.. Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawai'i, revised edition. Honolulu; University of Hawai'i Press (1999)
• 23 Yamada T.. Studies on the leaf nodules. II. On the leaf nodules in the genus Ardisia. .  Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Chiba University. (1953);  2 59-73
• 24 Yamada T.. Studies on the leaf nodules. On the historical researches of the leaf nodules.  Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Chiba University. (1954);  3 77-103
• 25 Yamada T.. Studies on the leaf nodules. V. The formation of knobs by the effect of antibiotics on the Ardisia crispa and A. punctata. .  Botanical Magazine (Tokyo). (1955);  68 267-273
• 26 Zar J. H.. Biostatistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River. New Jersey; Prentice Hall (1999)
• 27 Zheng-yi W., Raven P. H.. Flora of China, Vol. 15. Beijing and St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden (1994)

Editor: H. Papen