Validation of the Quality of Histological Images Obtained of Fresh and Formalin-Fixed Specimens of Esophageal and Gastric Mucosa by Laser-Scanning Confocal Microscopy

Background and Study Aims: We have previously reported the success of a method of virtual histology using laser-scanning confocal microscopy (LCM) in vitro on untreated fresh specimens obtained from the gastrointestinal mucosa. In the present study, we aimed to apply LCM to both fresh and formalin-fixed specimens, without additional treatment, in order to validate and compare the quality of the images obtained.
Methods: We obtained 18 specimens from 11 patients, either by endoscopic biopsy or following surgical resection. First, we observed the fresh, saline-immersed specimen with LCM using the Fluroview microscope (Olympus Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). We then fixed the specimen with formalin and obtained further LCM images 1 hour, 3 hours, and 24 hours after fixation. Three independent observers observed the images and were asked to assess the origin of the samples, the treatment of the samples, the time after formalin fixation, and whether they showed benign or malignant lesions. We used kappa statistics to compare the agreement among the three observers in each of these four areas of interest.
Results: Between January and March 2003, we obtained 191 LCM images from 18 specimens. Thirty images were randomly selected for observation. The overall accuracy for differentiating between esophagus and stomach specimens was 96.6 %. The accuracy of differentiating normal from cancerous lesions was 92.2 %. The differentiation between saline-immersed and formalin-fixed specimens was 59.7 % accurate and the assessment of the time interval after formalin fixation was only 37.3 % accurate. The kappa statistics showed that there was strong interobserver agreement on the differentiation of specimen origin and of cancerous from benign lesions. However, there was no agreement among the observers on the method of specimen preparation or on the estimated time interval after formalin fixation.
Conclusions: We concluded that images obtained from fresh specimens using LCM were of a quality good enough to make an accurate diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal carcinoma.

References

• 1 Inoue H, Igari T, Nishikage T. et al . A novel method of virtual histopathology using laser-scanning confocal microscopy in-vitro with untreated fresh specimens from the gastrointestinal mucosa.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 439-443
• 2 Dacosta R S, Wilson B C, Marcon N E. New optical technologies for earlier endoscopic diagnosis of premalignant gastrointestinal lesions.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;  17 (Suppl) S85-S104
• 3 Yoshida T, Inoue H, Usui S. et al . Narrow band imaging system with magnifying endoscopy for superficial esophageal lesions.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 288-295
• 4 Inoue H, Kazawa T, Sato Y. et al . In vivo observation of liver cancer cells in the esophagus, stomach and colon using catheter-type contact endoscope, “Endocytoscopy system”.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2004;  14 589-594
• 5 Gonzalez S, Tannous Z. Real-time, in vivo confocal reflectance microscopy of basal cell carcinoma.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;  47 869-874
• 6 Cho J Y, Inoue H, Satodate H. et al . The mechanism of inverted phenomenon on laser reflectance index in esophageal cancer: implications of laser-scanning confocal microscopic diagnosis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 AB174
• 7 Inoue H, Cho J Y, Satodate H. et al . Development of virtual histology and virtual biopsy using laser-scanning confocal microscopy.  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2003;  237 37-39
• 8 Sung K B, Liang C, Descour M. et al . Fiber-optic confocal reflectance microscope with miniature objective for in vivo imaging of human tissues.  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002;  49 1168-1172
• 9 Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M. et al . Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  127 706-713
• 10 Scoazec J Y. Tissue and cell imaging in situ: potential for applications in pathology and endoscopy.  Gut. 2003;  52 (Suppl 4) iv1-iv6
• 11 Sakashita M, Inoue H, Kashida H. et al . Virtual histology of colorectal lesions using laser-scanning confocal microscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 1033-1038
• 12 Clark A, Collier T, Lacy A. et al . Detection of dysplasia with near real time confocal microscopy.  Biomed Sci Instrum. 2002;  38 393-398
• 13 Dubaj V, Mazzolini A, Wood A, Harris M. Optic fibre bundle contact imaging probe employing a laser scanning confocal microscope.  J Microsc. 2002;  207 108-117
• 14 Delaney P M, Harris M R, King R G. Fiberoptic laser scanning confocal microscopy suitable for fluorescence imaging.  Appl Opt. 1994;  33 573-577
• 15 Sokolov K, Sung K B, Collier T. et al . Endoscopic microscopy.  Dis Markers. 2002;  18 269-291