Comparison of Capsule Endoscopy with Ileocolonoscopy for Detecting Small-Bowel Lesions in Patients with Seronegative Spondyloarthropathies

Background and Study Aims: Patients with spondyloarthropathies are often found to have signs of small-bowel inflammation when examined by ileocolonoscopy. Because capsule endoscopy has been found to be superior to other endoscopic and radiological modalities in the detection of small-bowel inflammation, we aimed to compare the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy with that of ileocolonoscopy in the detection of small-bowel lesions in patients with spondyloarthropathies.
Patients and Methods: Twenty patients with documented seronegative peripheral arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or sacroiliitis, who had not taken nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the preceding 2 months, participated in the study. The patients underwent capsule endoscopy, followed by ileocolonoscopy within 7 days, with blinded assessment of both examinations. Biopsies were taken when indicated and adverse events were monitored. Patients completed a questionnaire on their satisfaction with the two procedures.
Results: A total of 20 patients (11 men, 9 women; mean age 41 ± 13 years) with seronegative inflammatory spondyloarthropathies but without abdominal complaints completed the study. No adverse effects were reported and all the capsules were excreted. Of these 20 patients, 11 (55 %) had a normal small bowel on both examinations. Significant small-bowel findings (erythema, mucosal breaks, aphthous or linear ulcers, erosions) were detected by capsule endoscopy in six patients (30 %) and by ileocolonoscopy in only one patient. In addition, capsule endoscopy detected significant upper gastrointestinal pathology in 40 % of patients. The patients preferred capsule endoscopy to ileocolonoscopy.
Conclusions: Capsule endoscopy detected more small-bowel lesions than ileocolonoscopy, and provided additional potentially relevant information on upper gastrointestinal pathology in patients with spondyloarthropathies.

References

• 1 Mielants H, Veys E M, Cuvelier C, De Vos M. Ileocolonoscopic findings in seronegative spondyloarthropathies.  Br J Rheumatol. 1988;  27 95-105
• 2 Mielants H, Veys E M, Goethals K. et al . Destructive lesions of small joints in seronegative spondyloarthropathies: relation to gut inflammation.  Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1990;  8 23-27
• 3 Eliakim R. Wireless capsule video endoscopy - three years of experience.  World J Gastroenterol. 2004;  10 1238-1239
• 4 Ell C, Remke S, May A. et al . The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 685-689
• 5 Saurin J C, Delvaux M, Gaudin J L. et al . Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: blinded comparison with video push-enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 576-584
• 6 Cave D R. Wireless video capsule endoscopy.  Clin Perspect Gastroenterol. 2002;  5 203-207
• 7 Eliakim R, Fischer D, Suissa A. et al . Wireless capsule video endoscopy is a superior diagnostic tool compared to barium follow through and CT in patients with suspected Crohn’s disease.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;  15 363-367
• 8 Fireman Z, Mahajna E, Broude E. et al . Diagnosing small bowel Crohn’s disease with wireless capsule endoscopy.  Gut. 2003;  52 390-392
• 9 Herrerias J M, Caunedo A, Rodriguez-Tellez M. et al . Capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn’s disease in negative endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 1-5
• 10 Mow W S, Lo S K, Targan S R. et al . Initial experience with wireless capsule enteroscopy in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 31-40
• 11 Goldstein J L, Eissen G M, Lewis B. et al . Video capsule endoscopy to prospectively assess small bowel injury with celecoxib, naproxen plus omeprazole and placebo.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  3 133-141
• 12 Graham D Y, Opekun A R, Willingham F F, Qureshi W A. Visible small-intestinal mucosal injury in chronic NSAID users.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  3 55-59
• 13 Maiden L, Thjodleifsson B, Theodors A. et al . A quantitative analysis of NSAID-induced small bowel pathology by capsule endoscopy.  Gastroenterology. 2005;  128 1172-1178
• 14 Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sunada K. et al . Clinical outcomes of double-balloon endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 1032-1034
• 15 Ell C, May A, Nachbar L. et al . Push-and-pull enteroscopy in the small bowel using the double-balloon technique: results of a prospective European multicenter study.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 613-616
• 16 Heine G DN, Hadithi M, Groenen M JM. et al . Double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, yield, and complications in a series of 275 patients with suspected small-bowel disease.  Endoscopy. 2005;  in press
• 17 Gay G, Delvaux M, Fassler I. Capsule endoscopy to select indications and route of insertion of push-and-pull enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2005;  in press