REFERENCES
-
1 Skinner M W. Hearing Aid Evaluation. Englewood Cliffs. NJ; Prentice Hall 1988: 222-223
-
2
Fikret-Pasa S, Garstecki D C.
Real-ear measures in evaluation of frequency response and volume control characteristics of telephone amplifiers.
J Am Acad Audiol.
1993;
4
5-12
-
3
Mueller H G, Bryant M P.
Some commonly overlooked uses of probe microphone measures.
Semin Hear.
1991;
12
73-91
-
4
Tannahill J C.
Performance characteristics for hearing aid microphone versus telephone and telephone/telecoil reception modes.
J Speech Hear Res.
1983;
26
195-201
-
5
Plyler P N, Burchfield S B, Thelin J W.
Telephone communication with in-the-ear hearing aids using acoustic and electromagnetic coupling.
J Am Acad Audiol.
1998;
9
434-443
-
6
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association .
Guidelines for manual pure-tone audiometry.
ASHA.
1978;
20
297-301
-
7 Mueller H G, Hawkins D B, Northern J L. Probe Microphone Measurements: Hearing Aid Selection and Assessment. San Diego, CA; Singular Publishing Group, Inc 1992
-
8 Byrne D, Parkinson A, Newall P. Modified hearing aid selection procedures for severe/profound hearing losses. In: Studebaker GA, Bess FH, Beck LB The Vanderbilt Hearing-Aid Report II Parkton, MD; York Press 1991: 295-300
-
9 American National Standards Institute .Specification of Hearing Aid Characteristics (ANSI S3.22-1996) New York, NY; ANSI 1996: 1-21
-
10
Causey G D, Hood L J, Hermanson C L, Bowling L S.
The Maryland CNC test: normative studies.
Audiology.
1984;
23
552-568
-
11 Auditory Research Laboratory .VA Medical Center, Long Beach, CA. Speech Recognition and Identification Materials, CD-ROM v. 1.1 Washington, DC; Rehabilitation Research & Development Service, VA Central Office 1991
-
12
Thornton A R, Raffin M J.
Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable.
J Speech Hear Res.
1978;
21
507-518
Gail TakahashiPh.D.
Audiology and Speech Pathology Service (126), VAMC Iowa City
601 Hwy 6 West, Iowa City, IA 52246
Email: Gail.takahashi@med.va.gov
