Programming the Telecoil: A Case Study

REFERENCES

• 1 Skinner M W. Hearing Aid Evaluation. Englewood Cliffs. NJ; Prentice Hall 1988: 222-223
• 2 Fikret-Pasa S, Garstecki D C. Real-ear measures in evaluation of frequency response and volume control characteristics of telephone amplifiers.  J Am Acad Audiol. 1993;  4 5-12
• 3 Mueller H G, Bryant M P. Some commonly overlooked uses of probe microphone measures.  Semin Hear. 1991;  12 73-91
• 4 Tannahill J C. Performance characteristics for hearing aid microphone versus telephone and telephone/telecoil reception modes.  J Speech Hear Res. 1983;  26 195-201
• 5 Plyler P N, Burchfield S B, Thelin J W. Telephone communication with in-the-ear hearing aids using acoustic and electromagnetic coupling.  J Am Acad Audiol. 1998;  9 434-443
• 6 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association . Guidelines for manual pure-tone audiometry.  ASHA. 1978;  20 297-301
• 7 Mueller H G, Hawkins D B, Northern J L. Probe Microphone Measurements: Hearing Aid Selection and Assessment. San Diego, CA; Singular Publishing Group, Inc 1992
• 8 Byrne D, Parkinson A, Newall P. Modified hearing aid selection procedures for severe/profound hearing losses. In: Studebaker GA, Bess FH, Beck LB The Vanderbilt Hearing-Aid Report II Parkton, MD; York Press 1991: 295-300
• 9 American National Standards Institute .Specification of Hearing Aid Characteristics (ANSI S3.22-1996) New York, NY; ANSI 1996: 1-21
• 10 Causey G D, Hood L J, Hermanson C L, Bowling L S. The Maryland CNC test: normative studies.  Audiology. 1984;  23 552-568
• 11 Auditory Research Laboratory .VA Medical Center, Long Beach, CA. Speech Recognition and Identification Materials, CD-ROM v. 1.1 Washington, DC; Rehabilitation Research & Development Service, VA Central Office 1991
• 12 Thornton A R, Raffin M J. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable.  J Speech Hear Res. 1978;  21 507-518