References
1a
Bredereck H.
Henning I.
Zinner H.
Chem. Ber.
1953,
86:
476
1b
Bredereck H.
Protzer W.
Chem. Ber.
1954,
87:
1873
2
d-Fructose: [α]D
22 -90.9 (c 10.34, H2O).
Analytical data of 2a: [α]D
22 +5.4 (c 5.00, MeOH); mp = 91.5-93.5 °C; R
f
= 0.62 (SiO2, EtOAc). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = -0.03-0.01 (12 H, m, CH3-Si), 0.78-0.82 (18 H, m, CH3-C-Si), 3.72-4.34 (10 H, m, 2 CH2, 3 CH, 3 OH). 13C NMR (100.4 MHz, CDCl3, two conformations): δ = -5.63, -5.62, -5.59, -5.53, -5.46, -5.39, -5.37, -5.30 (4 C, CH3-Si), 18.4, 18.5 (2 C, C-Si), 25.81, 25.90, 25.94 (6 C, CH3-C-Si), 63.6, 64.0 (CH2), 64.6, 66.8 (CH2), 77.5, 78.8 (CH), 78.9, 79.0 (CH), 85.7, 87.8 (CH), 104.2, 106.3 (C-2). MS (ESI): m/z (%) = 431 (100) [M + Na]+. Crystal data: crystal derived from toluene, C18H40O6Si2, M = 408.68, trigonal, P31 (no. 144), a = 17.0933 (13) Å, c = 15.5690 (16) Å, V = 3939.5 (6) Å3, Z = 6 (2 independent molecules), D
c = 1.034 g cm-3, µ(Cu-Kα) = 1.433 mm-1, T = 293 K, colorless needles, Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur PX Ultra diffractometer; 8947 independent measured reflections, F
2 refinement, R
1 = 0.094, wR
2 = 0.252, 4167 independent observed reflections [|F
o| > 4σ(|F
o|), 2θmax = 143°], 592 parameters. The absolute structure of 2a was determined by a combination of R-factor tests [R
1
+ = 0.0935, R
1
- = 0.0960] and by use of the Flack parameter [x
+ = +0.00(8)]. CCDC 270727.
3 Analytical data of 3b: [α]D
22 -12.9 (c 0.500, MeOH); R
f
= 0.21 (SiO2, hexane-Et2O 19:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = -0.10-0.00 (12 H, m, CH3-Si), 0.77-0.85 (18 H, m, CH3-C-Si), 3.46-4.80 (13 H, m, 5 CH2, 3 CH), 7.12-7.31 (15 arom. H). 13C NMR (100.4 MHz, CDCl3, two conformations): δ = -5.31, -5.27, -5.24, -5.18, -4.92, -4.21 (4 C, CH3-Si), 17.9, 18.3, 18.4 (2 C, C-Si), 25.7, 25.8, 25.83, 25.9, 26.0 (6 C, CH3-C-Si), 63.0, 64.7, 64.8, 66.9, 67.6, 69.4, 72.2, 72.6, 72.9, 73.4 (5 C, CH2), 76.5, 80.1, 80.2, 82.8, 84.5, 85.5 (3 C, CH), 104.7, 104.8 (C-2), 127.1, 127.2, 127.5, 127.52, 127.6, 127.67, 127.7, 127.8, 127.85, 127.9, 128.0, 128.1, 128.2, 128.23, 128.3, 128.4, 128.5 (15 arom. CH), 138.3, 138.4, 138.43, 138.5, 138.6 (3 arom. C). MS (ESI): m/z (%) = 701 (100) [M + Na]+, 517 (35).
4 Analytical data of 4b: [α]D
22 -17.6 (c 1.07, MeOH); R
f
= 0.21 (SiO2, EtOAc-hexane 3:2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.38-4.84 (15 H, m, 5 CH2, 3 CH, 2 OH), 7.18-7.39 (15 arom. H). 13C NMR (100.4 MHz, CDCl3, two conformations): δ = 63.5, 64.4, 64.7, 64.9, 65.2, 70.9, 72.8, 72.9, 73.0, 73.6 (5 C, CH2), 76.5, 79.6, 80.5, 82.7, 84.8, 84.9 (3 C, CH), 104.8, 105.1 (C-2), 127.4, 127.45, 127.5, 127.6, 127.7, 127.8, 127.82, 127.86, 127.9, 128.0, 128.1, 128.16, 128.2, 128.3, 128.49, 128.50, 128.53, 128.7 (15 arom. CH), 137.8, 137.9, 138.0, 138.3, 138.7. 138.9 (3 arom. C). MS (ESI): m/z (%) = 473 (20) [M + Na]+, 186 (100).
5 Analytical data of 1b: [α]D
22 -3.9 (c 1.07, MeOH); R
f
= 0.17 (SiO2, Et2O-hexane 1:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
6, 60 °C): δ = 3.03, 3.26 (2 H, 2 d, J = 9.5 Hz, CH2-1), 3.62 (1 H, dd, J = 11.1, 6.0 Hz, CH2-6), 3.77 (1 H, dd, J = 11.1, 2.4 Hz, CH2-6), 3.92-3.95 (1 H, m, CH-5), 4.12-4.23 (1 H, m, CH-4), 4.28 (1 H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, CH-3), 4.56 (6 H, s, 3 × CH2-Ph), 5.50 (1 H, d, J = 5.6 Hz, OH-CH-4), 7.12-7.50 (30 H, m, arom. H). 13C NMR (100.4 MHz, DMSO-d
6, 60 °C, the only fructose derivative found here displaying only one conformation): δ = 63.7 (CH2-Ph), 66.2 (CH2-1), 70.3 (CH2-6), 71.7 (CH2-Ph), 72.4 (CH2-Ph), 74.7 (CH-4), 80.0 (CH-5), 85.0 (CH-3), 103.8 (C-2), 126.5, 126.9, 126.95, 127.0, 127.1, 127.2, 127.25, 127.3, 127.4, 127.5, 127.7, 127.8, 127.9, 128.0, 128.05, 128.1, 128.3, 128.4 (30 arom. CH), 138.5, 138.9, 143.5, 147.8 (6 arom. C). The assignment of the 1H- and 13C NMR spectra was based on COSY, HSQC and HMBC spectra (unsuccessful for CPh3 though). NOESY cross peaks between CH-3 and both CH
2-1 proved that the β-anomer was present. MS (ESI): m/z (%) = 715 (19) [M + Na]+, 243 (26) [Ph3C]+, 186 (100).
6 Analytical data of 2b. Acid quenching or warming to r.t. lead to an exothermic reaction resulting in complex mixtures. Isolation of 2b - the main product whereas no 2a was found - was only successful when the cold mixture was subjected to column chromatography very quickly: [α]D
22 ca. 0 (c 1.05, MeOH); R
f
= 0.13 (SiO2, EtOAc-hexane 1:2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.03-0.19 (12 H, m, CH3-Si), 0.86-0.95 (18 H, m, CH3-C-Si), 3.49-4.25 (10 H, m, 2 CH2, 3 CH, 3 OH). 13C NMR (100.4 MHz, CDCl3, two conformations): δ = -4.9, -4.8, -4.6, -4.5, -3.6 (4 C, CH3-Si), 17.8, 17.9, 18.3, 18.4 (2 C, C-Si), 25.6, 25.6, 25.7, 25.8 (6 C,
CH3-C-Si), 63.2, 63.4 (CH2), 64.5, 65.7 (CH2), 77.2, 77.6 (CH), 79.1, 79.2 (CH), 84.4, 86.9 (CH), 103.3, 107.2 (2-C). MS (ESI): m/z (%) = 431 (100) [M + Na]+.
7 Oral communication by Henry Rzepa.
8 Molecular mechanics (MM2) of Chem3D Ultra 9.0: for 2a the X-ray data of the conformation yielding the lower energy were used whereas for 2b several conformations were tried and again the one resulting in the lowest energy was chosen.
9a
Yoon S.
J. Korean Chem. Soc.
2002,
46:
590
9b
Arias-Pérez MS.
López MS.
Santos MJ.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
2002,
1549
9c
Li Y.
Horton D.
Barberousse V.
Samreth S.
Bellamy F.
Carbohydr. Res.
1999,
316:
104
9d
Akai S.
Nishino N.
Iwata Y.
Hiyama J.
Kawashima E.
Sato K.
Ishido Y.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1998,
39:
5583
10a
Brook AG.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1958,
80:
1886
10b
Brook AG.
Acc. Chem. Res.
1974,
7:
77