Rehabilitation motorischer Funktionsstörungen nach Schlaganfall

Weiterbildungsziele In diesem Beitrag sollen folgende Weiterbildungsziele vermittelt werden: Neurophysiologische Grundlagen motorischer Rehabilitation Evidenzbasierte therapeutische Interventionen Kerninhalte übender Verfahren Einsatz zusätzlicher Therapieoptionen (technische Geräte, Medikamente)

Literatur

• 1 Woldag H, Hummelsheim H. Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients: a review.  J Neurol. 2002;  249 518-528
• 2 Dickstein R, Hocherman S, Pillar T, Shaham R. Stroke rehabilitation. Three exercise therapy approaches.  Phys Ther. 1986;  66 1233-1238
• 3 Logigian M K, Samuels M A, Falconer J, Zagar R. Clinical exercise trial for stroke patients.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;  64 364-367
• 4 Stern P H, McDowell F, Miller J M, Robinson M. Effects of facilitation exercise techniques in stroke rehabilitation.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1970;  51 526-531
• 5 Basmajian J V, Gowland C A, Finlayson M A. et al . Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behavioral-physical therapy vs traditional physical therapy programs.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;  68 267-272
• 6 Lincoln N B, Parry R H, Vass C D. Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke.  Stroke. 1999;  30 573-579
• 7 Langhammer B, Stanghelle J K. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study.  Clin Rehabil. 2000;  14 361-369
• 8 Asanuma H, Pavlides C. Neurobiological basis of motor learning in mammals.  Neuroreport. 1997;  8 i-vi
• 9 Asanuma H, Keller A. Neuronal mechanisms of motor learning in mammals.  Neuroreport. 1991;  2 217-224
• 10 Woldag H, Waldmann G, Knösche T R. et al .Rapidly induced changes in neuromagnetic fields following repetitive hand movements. Europ J Neurol 2005, in press
• 11 Classen J, Liepert J, Wise S P. et al . Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice.  J Neurophysiol. 1998;  79 1117-1123
• 12 Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke M T. et al . Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients.  Stroke. 1995;  26 976-981
• 13 Visintin M, Barbeau H, Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo N E. A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation.  Stroke. 1998;  29 1122-1128
• 14 Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C, Ruckriem S. Speed-dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.  Stroke. 2002;  33 553-558
• 15 Werner C, Frankenberg S Von, Treig T. et al . Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: a randomized crossover study.  Stroke. 2002;  33 2895-2901
• 16 Hesse S, Malezic M, Schaffrin A, Mauritz K H. Restoration of gait by combined treadmill training and multichannel electrical stimulation in non-ambulatory hemiparetic patients.  Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995;  27 199-204
• 17 Malezic M, Hesse S. Restoration of gait by functional electrical stimulation in paraplegic patients: a modified programme of treatment.  Paraplegia. 1995;  33 126-131
• 18 Malezic M, Hesse S, Schewe H, Mauritz K H. Restoration of standing, weight-shift and gait by multichannel electrical stimulation in hemiparetic patients.  Int J Rehabil Res. 1994;  17 169-179
• 19 Merletti R, Zelaschi F, Latella D. et al . A control study of muscle force recovery in hemiparetic patients during treatment with functional electrical stimulation.  Scand J Rehabil Med. 1978;  10 147-154
• 20 Yan T, Hui-Chan C WY, Li L SW. Functional electrical stimulation improves motor recovery of the lower extremity and walking ability of subjects with first acute stroke: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.  Stroke. 2005;  36 80-85
• 21 Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz K H. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand.  J Neurol Sci. 1995;  130 59-68
• 22 Woldag H, Waldmann G, Heuschkel G, Hummelsheim H. Is the repetitive training of complex hand and arm movements beneficial for motor recovery in stroke patients?.  Clin Rehabil. 2003;  17 723-730
• 23 Miltner W H, Bauder H, Sommer M. et al . Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication.  Stroke. 1999;  30 586-592
• 24 Taub E, Miller N E, Novack T A. et al . Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;  74 347-354
• 25 Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - a clinical review.  J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;  36 237-251
• 26 Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I. et al . Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;  83 1374-1377
• 27 Sterr A, Freivogel S. Motor-improvement following intensive training in low-functioning chronic hemiparesis.  Neurology. 2003;  61 842-844
• 28 Platz T, Winter T, Muller N. et al . Arm ability training for stroke and traumatic brain injury patients with mild arm paresis: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;  82 961-968
• 29 Aisen M L, Krebs H I, Hogan N. et al . The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke.  Arch Neurol. 1997;  54 443-446
• 30 Volpe B T, Krebs H I, Hogan N. et al . A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation.  Neurology. 2000;  54 1938-1944
• 31 Lum P S, Burgar C G, Shor P C. et al . Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;  83 952-959
• 32 Fasoli S E, Krebs H I, Stein J. et al . Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;  85 1106-1111
• 33 Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M. et al . Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;  84 915-920
• 34 Burgar C G, Lum P S, Shor P C, Machiel Van der Loos H F. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience.  J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;  37 663-673
• 35 Hummelsheim H, Amberger S, Mauritz K H. The influence of EMG-initiated electrical muscle stimulation on motor recovery of the centrally paretic hand.  Eur J Neurol. 1996;  3 245-254
• 36 Hummelsheim H, Maier-Loth M L, Eickhof C. The functional value of electrical muscle stimulation for the rehabilitation of the hand in stroke patients.  Scand J Rehabil Med. 1997;  29 3-10
• 37 Kroon J R de, Ijzerman M J, Chae J. et al . Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke.  J Rehabil Med. 2005;  37 65-74
• 38 Decety J, Grezes J. Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions.  Trends Cogn Sci. 1999;  3 172-178
• 39 Herbert R D, Dean C, Gandevia S C. Effects of real and imagined training on voluntary muscle activation during maximal isometric contractions.  Acta Physiol Scand. 1998;  163 361-368
• 40 Pascual-Leone A, Nguyet D, Cohen L G. et al . Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills.  J Neurophysiol. 1995;  74 1037-1045
• 41 Yue G, Cole K J. Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions.  J Neurophysiol. 1992;  67 1114-1123
• 42 Jackson P L, Lafleur M F, Malouin F. et al . Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;  82 1133-1141
• 43 Bakheit A M, Pittock S, Moore A P. et al . A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in upper limb spasticity in patients with stroke.  Eur J Neurol. 2001;  8 559-565
• 44 Hesse S, Brandl-Hesse B, Bardeleben A. et al . Botulinum toxin A treatment of adult upper and lower limb spasticity.  Drugs Aging. 2001;  18 255-262
• 45 Pittock S J, Moore A P, Hardiman O. et al . A double-blind randomised placebo-controlled evaluation of three doses of botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) in the treatment of spastic equinovarus deformity after stroke.  Cerebrovasc Dis . 2003;  15 289-300
• 46 Reiter F, Danni M, Ceravolo M G, Provinciali L. Disability changes after treatment of upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin.  J Neuro Rehab. 1996;  10 47-52
• 47 Rousseaux M, Kozlowski O, Froger J. Efficacy of botulinum toxin A in upper limb function of hemiplegic patients.  J Neurol. 2002;  249 76-84
• 48 Woldag H, Hummelsheim H. Is the reduction of spasticity by botulinum toxin a beneficial for the recovery of motor function of arm and hand in stroke patients?.  Eur Neurol. 2003;  50 165-171
• 49 Ward A B, Aguilar M, de Beyl Z. et al . Use of botulinum toxin type A in management of adult spasticity. A European consensus statement.  Eura Medicophys. 2004;  40 83-84
• 50 Bakheit A M, Fedorova N V, Skoromets A A. et al . The beneficial antispasticity effect of botulinum toxin type A is maintained after repeated treatment cycles.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;  75 1558-1561
• 51 Treig T, Werner C, Sachse M, Hesse S. No benefit from D-amphetamine when added to physiotherapy after stroke: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.  Clin Rehabil. 2003;  17 590-599
• 52 Scheidtmann K, Fries W, Muller F, Koenig E. Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study.  Lancet. 2001;  358 787-790