References
1a
Node M.
Inoue T.
Araki M.
Nakamura D.
Nishide K.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1995,
36:
2255
1b
Katoh T.
Kakiya K.
Nakai T.
Nakamura S.
Nishide K.
Node M.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2002,
13:
2351
1c
Node M.
Inoue T.
Araki M.
Nakamura D.
Nishide K.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1998,
9:
157
1d
Node M.
Nakamura S.
Nakamura D.
Katoh T.
Nishide K.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1999,
40:
5357
2
Pappo R.
Allen DS.
Lemieux RU.
Johnson WS.
J. Org. Chem.
1956,
21:
478
3
Seebach D.
Hungerbuhler E.
Naef R.
Schnurrenberger P.
Weidmann B.
Zuger M.
Synthesis
1982,
138
4 As shown below, the singlet signal assigned to the α-methyl group of 2a-cis appeared at lower magnetic field than that of 2a-trans, while methyl signals as doublets were observed at almost the same chemical shift.
2a-
cis: [α]D +69.6 (c 1.19, CHCl3, 84% ee); IR (CHCl3): 2951, 1736, 1705, 1458, 1273 cm-1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.74 (s, 3 H), 2.71-2.59 (m, 1 H), 2.46-2.45 (m, 1 H), 2.10-2.00 (m, 1 H), 1.90-1.78 (m, 3 H), 1.55-1.47 (m, 1 H), 1.47 (s, 3 H), 1.03 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H); MS (20 eV): m/z (%) = 184 (M+, 20), 152 (20), 124 (37), 101 (100), 58 (34); HRMS: m/z calcd for C10H16O3 (M+): 184.1099, found: 184.1103.
2a-
trans: [α]D -153 (c 0.80, CHCl3, 89% ee); IR (CHCl3): 2939, 1709, 1454, 1258 cm-1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.72 (s, 3 H), 2.59 (m, 2 H), 2.08-2.00 (m, 1 H), 1.76-1.67 (m, 2 H), 1.46-1.30 (m, 2 H), 1.28 (s, 3 H), 1.05 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3 H); MS (20 eV): m/z (%) = 184 (M+, 59), 152 (35), 124 (56), 101 (100), 58 (62); HRMS: m/z calcd for C10H16O3 (M+): 184.1099, found: 184.1094.
5a
Westerman B.
Scharman HG.
Kortman I.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1993,
10:
2119
5b
Tomioka K.
Ando K.
Takemasa Y.
Koga K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1984,
106:
2718
6 (1R)-(1-Methyl-2-oxocyclohexyl)carboxylic acid (60% ee) prepared by PLE-catalyzed optical resolution of ethyl (1-methyl-2-oxocyclohexyl)carboxylate
[5]
was derivatized to (1R,3R)- and (1R,3S)-methyl (1-methyl-2-oxocyclo-hexyl)carboxylate; the direction of optical rotation [(+) for cis isomer, and (-) for trans isomer] implied that the 2a-cis and 2a-trans should have an R configuration at C-1.
7a
Haworth RD.
Moore BP.
J. Chem. Soc.
1946,
633
7b
Mancini V.
Fringuelli F.
Taticci A.
Gazz. Chim. Ital.
1969,
99:
953
7c
Kanjilal RD.
Alam SK.
Ghatak UR.
Synth. Commun.
1981,
795
7d
Snider BB.
Mohan R.
Kates SA.
J. Org. Chem.
1985,
50:
3659
7e
Meyer WL.
Maheshwari KK.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1964,
2175
7f
Roy A.
Paul T.
Drew MGB.
Mukherjee D.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2003,
44:
4835
8
Hao X.-J.
Node M.
Fuji K.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1992,
1505
9
Corey EJ.
Fuchs PL.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1972,
3769
10
King FE.
King TJ.
Topliss JG.
J. Chem. Soc.
1957,
9:
719
11 Eaton P. E., Carlson G. R., Lee J. T.; J. Org. Chem.; 1973, 573
12 Recrystallization of 12 (258 mg, 84% ee) from n-hexane afforded the optically pure compound (61.0 mg, >99.5%).
13a
Nishide K.
Ohsugi S.
Fudesaka M.
Kodama S.
Node M.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2002,
43:
5177
13b
Ohsugi S.
Nishide K.
Oono K.
Okuyama K.
Fudesaka M.
Kodama S.
Node M.
Tetrahedron
2003,
59:
8393
13c
Nishide K.
Ohsugi S.
Miyamoto T.
Kumar K.
Node M.
Monatsh. Chem.
2004,
135:
189
14
Mancini V.
Fringuelli F.
Taticchi A.
Gazz. Chim. Ital.
1969,
99:
953