Microsurgical Excision of the Large or Giant Cerebellopontine Angle Meningioma

Abstract

Objective: The object of this study was to analysis the therapeutic effects of microsurgical excision in cases with the large or giant cerebellopontine angle meningioma. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the 56 patients who suffered from the large or giant cerebellopontine angle meningioma and underwent the microsurgical therapy, for which the suboccipital-retrosigmoidal approach was adopted in 38 cases, the temporal-occipital craniotomy, presigmoidal approach in 6 cases, the temporal-occipital craniotomy, inferotemporal tentorium cerebelli approach in 8 cases, and the temporal-occipital craniotomy, supratentorial or infratentorial allied approach in 4 cases. Results: The tumors of 44 cases were all resected (Simpson I, II), with a total resection rate of 78.6 %, and there was no operative mortality. After surgery, symptoms improved in 40 cases and remained unchanged in 10 cases. Among 54 cases, recrudescence was seen in 2 cases (3.7 %) and being able to take care of themselves in 50 cases (92.6 %) at 6 months through 6 years follow-up after surgery. Conclusion: A rationally selected surgical approach, a microscopic technology applied in the operation to appropriately treat and protect vein, nerve and brain stem, which can ideally excise the tumors, together can increase the survival ability of patients.

Key words

Cerebellopontine angle (CPA) - meningioma - microsurgery - effect

References

• 1 Sekhar L N, Jannetta P J. Cerebellopontine angle meningiomas, Microsurgical excision and follow-up results.  J Neurosurg. 1984;  60 500-505
• 2 Martinez R, Vaquero J, Areitio E, Bravo G. Meningiomas of the posterior fossa.  Surg Neurol. 1983;  19 237-243
• 3 Chan R C, Thompson G B. Morbidity, mortality, and quality of life following surgery for intracranial meningiomas, a retrospective study in 257 cases.  J Neurosurg. 1984;  60 52-60
• 4 Voss N F, Vrionis F D, Heilman C B, Robertson J H. Meningiomas of the cerebellopontine angle.  Surg Neurol. 2000;  53 439-447
• 5 Rhoton Jr A L. Meningiomas of the cerebellopontine angle and foramen magnum.  Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1994;  5 349-377
• 6 Gerganov V, Bussarsky V, Romansky K, Popov R, Djendov S, Dimitrov I. Cerebellopontine angle meningiomas. Clinical features and surgical treatment.  J Neurosurg Sci. 2003;  47 129-135
• 7 Roberti F, Sekhar L N, Kalavakonda C, Wright D C. Posterior fossa meningiomas: surgical experience in 161 cases.  Surg Neurol. 2001;  56 8-21
• 8 Sepehrnia A, Knopp U. The combined subtemporal-suboccipital approach: a modified surgical access to the clivus and petrous apex.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2002;  45 102-104
• 9 Quinones-Hinojosa A, Binder D K, Hemphill 3rd J C, Manley G T. Diagnosis of posttraumatic transverse sinus thrombosis with magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance venography: report of two cases.  J Trauma. 2004;  56 201-204
• 10 Lange M, Duc L D, Hom P, Fink U, Oeckler R. Cerebellopontine angle meningiomas (cpam) - clinical characteristics and surgical results.  Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2000;  34 107-113
• 11 Samii M, Ammirari M. Surgery of skull base meningiomas. Berlin: Springer Verlag 1992: 73-85
• 12 Bassiouni H, Hunold A, Asgari S, Stolke D. Meningiomas of the posterior petrous bone: functional outcome after microsurgery.  J Neurosurg. 2004;  100 1014-1024
• 13 Batra P S, Dutra J C, Wiet R J. Auditory and facial nerve function following surgery for cerebellopontine angle meningiomas.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;  128 369-374
• 14 Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Yasui T, Komiyama M, Nishikawa M, Nakajima H, Kishi H. Gamma knife surgery for skull base meningiomas. The effectiveness of low-dose treatment.  Surg Neurol. 1999;  52 40-45
• 15 Marangos N, Maier W, Merz R, Laszig R. Brainstem response in cerebellopontine angle tumors.  Otol Neurotol. 2001;  22 95-99