Semin Reprod Med 2006; 24(1): 025-032
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-931798
Copyright © 2006 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Anatomic Factors in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Anne S. Devi Wold1 , 3 , Norma Pham3 , Aydin Arici2 , 3
  • 1Instructor
  • 2Professor and Director, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • 3Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 January 2006 (online)

ABSTRACT

Anatomic uterine defects are present in 15% of women evaluated for three or more consecutive spontaneous abortions. These anatomic abnormalities can be classified as congenital or acquired. In addition to pregnancy loss, uterine malformations appear to predispose women to other reproductive difficulties including infertility, preterm labor, and abnormal presentation. These poor reproductive outcomes resulting from uterine septum, intrauterine adhesions, polyps, and fibroids are amenable to surgical correction. Therefore, it is essential to make an accurate diagnosis to offer an adequate treatment. In this article, we review the common congenital and acquired uterine anomalies associated with recurrent pregnancy losses, and discuss contemporary diagnosis and treatment options.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Kutteh W H. Recurrent pregnancy loss. Precis, an Update in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2nd ed. Washington, DC; American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002: 151-161
  • 2 Stephenson M D. Frequency of factors associated with habitual abortion in 197 couples.  Fertil Steril. 1996;  66(1) 24-29
  • 3 Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Pellicer A. Reproductive impact of congenital Mullerian anomalies.  Hum Reprod. 1997;  12(10) 2277-2281
  • 4 Salim R, Regan L, Woelfer B, Backos M, Jurkovic D. A comparative study of the morphology of congenital uterine anomalies in women with and without a history of recurrent first trimester miscarriage.  Hum Reprod. 2003;  18(1) 162-166
  • 5 Byrne J, Nussbaum-Blask A, Taylor W S et al.. Prevalence of Mullerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound.  Am J Med Genet. 2000;  94(1) 9-12
  • 6 Homer H A, Li T-C, Cooke I D. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  73(1) 1-14
  • 7 Maneschi F, Zupi E, Marconi D, Valli E, Romanini C, Mancuso S. Hysteroscopically detected asymptomatic müllerian anomalies. Prevalence and reproductive implications.  J Reprod Med. 1995;  40(10) 684-688
  • 8 Simon C, Martinez L, Pardo F, Tortajada M, Pellicer A. Mullerian defects in women with normal reproductive outcome.  Fertil Steril. 1991;  56(6) 1192-1193
  • 9 Stray-Pedersen B, Stray-Pedersen S. Etiologic factors and subsequent reproductive performance in 195 couples with a prior history of habitual abortion.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;  148(2) 140-146
  • 10 Larsen WJ Development of the Urogenital System. New York; Churchill Livingston 1993: 235-279
  • 11 Manyonda I, Sinthamoney E, Bell A M. Controversies and challenges n the modern management of fibroids.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;  111 95-102
  • 12 Buttram Jr V C, Gibbons W E. Mullerian anomalies: a proposed classification. (An analysis of 144 cases).  Fertil Steril. 1979;  32(1) 40-46
  • 13 The American Fertility Society . The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions.  Fertil Steril. 1988;  49(6) 944-955
  • 14 Troiano R N. Magnetic resonance imaging of müllerian duct anomalies of the uterus.  Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;  14(4) 269-279
  • 15 Propst A M, Hill III J A. Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss.  Semin Reprod Med. 2000;  18(4) 341-350
  • 16 Harger J H, Archer D F, Marchese S G, Muracca-Clemens M, Garver K L. Etiology of recurrent pregnancy losses and outcome of subsequent pregnancies.  Obstet Gynecol. 1983;  62(5) 574-581
  • 17 Heinonen P K, Savolainen A, Pystynen P. Septate uterus and habitual abortion: a case report illustrating successful outcome of pregnancy after second metroplasty.  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1986;  23(3-4) 233-238
  • 18 Raziel A, Arieli S, Bukovsky I, Caspi E, Golan A. Investigation of the uterine cavity in recurrent aborters.  Fertil Steril. 1994;  62(5) 1080-1082
  • 19 Fedele L, Bianchi S, Marchini M, Franchi D, Tozzi L, Dorta M. Ultrastructure aspects of endometrium in infertile women with septate uterus.  Fertil Steril. 1996;  65(4) 750-752
  • 20 Fedele L, Arcaini L, Parazzini F, Vercellini P, Di Nola G. Reproductive prognosis after hysteroscopic metroplasty in 102 women: life-table analysis.  Fertil Steril. 1993;  59 768-772
  • 21 DeCherney A H, Russell J B, Graebe R A, Polan M L. Resectoscopic management of müllerian fusion defects.  Fertil Steril. 1986;  45(5) 726-728
  • 22 Valle R F, Sciarra J J. Hysteroscopic treatment of the septate uterus.  Obstet Gynecol. 1986;  67(2) 253-257
  • 23 Corson S L. Operative hysteroscopy for infertility.  Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1992;  35 229-241
  • 24 Fedele L, Bianchi S. Hysteroscopic metroplasty for the septate uterus.  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995;  22 473-489
  • 25 Querleu D, Brasme T L, Parmentier D. Ultrasound-guided transcervical metroplasty.  Fertil Steril. 1990;  54 995-998
  • 26 Fedele L, Bianchi S, Agnoli B et al.. Urinary tract anomalies associated with unicornuate uterus.  J Urol. 1996;  155 847-848
  • 27 Andrews M C, Jones Jr H W. Impaired reproductive performance of the unicornuate uterus: intrauterine growth retardation, infertility, and recurrent abortion in five cases.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;  144(2) 173-176
  • 28 Heinonen P K. Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies after abdominal or hysteroscopic metroplasty or no surgical treatment.  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997;  4(3) 311-317
  • 29 Leible S, Munoz H, Walton R, Sabaj V, Cumsille F, Sepulveda W. Uterine artery blood flow velocity waveforms in pregnant women with müllerian duct anomaly: a biologic model for uteroplacental insufficiency.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  178(5) 1048-1053
  • 30 Abramovici H, Faktor J H, Pascal B. Congenital uterine malformations as indication for cervical suture (cerclage) in habitual abortion and premature delivery.  Int J Fertil. 1983;  28(3) 161-164
  • 31 Buttram Jr V C. Mullerian anomalies and their management.  Fertil Steril. 1983;  40(2) 159-163
  • 32 Strassmann E O. Fertility and the unification of the pregnant uterus.  Fertil Steril. 1966;  17 165-176
  • 33 Steinberg W. Strassman's metroplasty in the managemnt of bipartite uterus causing sterility or habitual abortion.  Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1955;  10 400-430
  • 34 Patton P E. Anatomic uterine defects.  Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  37(3) 705-721
  • 35 Acien P. Reproductive performance of women with uterine malformations.  Hum Reprod. 1993;  8 122-126
  • 36 Kaufman R H, Adam E, Binder G L, Gerthoffer E. Upper genital tract changes and pregnancy outcome in offspring exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;  137 299-308
  • 37 Propst A M, Hill III J A. Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss.  Semin Reprod Med. 2000;  18(4) 341-350
  • 38 Goldberg G M, Falcone T. Effect of diethylstilbestrol on reproductive function.  Fertil Steril. 1999;  72 1-7
  • 39 Ludmir J, Landon M B, Gabbe S G, Samuels P, Mennuti M T. Management of the diethylstilbestrol-exposed pregnant patient: a prospective study.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;  157(3) 665-669
  • 40 Schenker J G, Margalioth E J. Intrauterine adhesions: an updated appraisal.  Fertil Steril. 1982;  37(5) 593-610
  • 41 Li T C, Mortimer R, Cooke I D. Myomectomy: a retrospective study to examine reproductive performance before and after surgery.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 1735-1740
  • 42 Stovall D W, Parrish S B, Van Voorhis B J et al.. Uterine leiomyomas reduce the efficacy os assisted reproduction.  Hum Reprod. 1998;  13 192-197
  • 43 Surrey E S, Lietz A K, Schoolcraft W B. Impact of intramural leiomyomata in patients with a normal endometrial cavity on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycle outcome.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  75 405-419
  • 44 Marchionni M, Fambrini M, Zambelli V, Scarselli G, Susini T. Reproductive performance before and after myomectomy of large myomata: a retrospective analysis.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  82 154-159
  • 45 Goldenberg M, Sivan E, Sharabi Z, Bider D, Rabinovici J, Seidman D S. Outcome of hysteroscopic resection of submucous myomas for infertility.  Fertil Steril. 1995;  64 714-716
  • 46 Goldberg J, Pereira L, Berghella V et al.. Pregnancy outcome after treatment fro fibromyomata: uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  191 18-21
  • 47 ACOG Practice . Cervical insufficiency.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;  85 81-89
  • 48 Owen J, Iams J D, Hauth J C. Vaginal sonography and cervical incompetence.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  188(2) 586-596
  • 49 Williams M, Iams J D. Cervical length measurement and cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth.  Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  47(4) 775-783
  • 50 Althuisius S M, Dekker G A, Hummel P, van Geijn H P. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: emergency cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  189(4) 907-910
  • 51 Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;  100(6) 516-523
  • 52 Salim R, Jurkovic D. Assessing congenital uterine anomalies: the role of three-dimensional ultrasonography.  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;  18(1) 29-36
  • 53 Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K, Jauniaux E, Natucci M, Campbell S. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;  5(4) 233-237
  • 54 Raga F, Bonilla-Musoles F, Blanes J, Osborne N G. Congenital Mullerian anomalies; diagnostic accuracy of three dimensional ultrasound.  Fertil Steril. 1996;  65 523-528

Aydin AriciM.D. 

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine

P.O. Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520

Email: aydin.arici@yale.edu