References
-
1
Devesa S S, Blot W J, Fraumeni J F jr.
Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States.
Cancer.
1998;
83
2049-2053
-
2
Blot W J, Devesa S S, Fraumeni J F jr.
Continuing climb in rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma: an update.
JAMA.
1993;
270
1320
-
3
Pera M, Cameron A J, Trastek V F. et al .
Increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction.
Gastroenterology.
1993;
104
510-513
-
4
Pohl H, Welch H G.
The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
2005;
97
142-146
-
5
Daly J M, Karnell L H, Menck H R.
National Cancer Data Base report on esophageal carcinoma.
Cancer.
1996;
78
1820-1828
-
6
Provenzale D, Kemp J A, Arora S, Wong J B.
A guide for surveillance of patients with Barrett’s esophagus.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1994;
89
670-680
-
7
Van Baal J, Milano F, Rygiel A. et al .
A comparative analysis by SAGE of gene expression profiles of Barrett’s esophagus, normal squamous esophagus, and gastric cardia.
Gastroenterology.
2005;
129
1274-1281
-
8
Van Baal J, Milano F, Buttar N S. et al .
Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-4 mediated transformation of inflamed squamous esophageal mucosa into Barrett’s esophagus [abstract].
Gastroenterology.
2006;
130 (4 Suppl 2)
A76
-
9
Moons L MG, Kusters J G, van Delft J. et al .
A pro-inflammatory IL-10/1L-12 gene profile is associated with an increased risk for developing Barrett’s esophagus [abstract].
Gastroenterology.
2006;
130 (4 Suppl 2)
A76
-
10
Feagins L A, Zhang H Y, Quinones M. et al .
Acid exerts an anti-proliferative effect in non-neoplastic Barrett’s epithelial cells by delaying cell cycle progression [abstract].
Gastroenterology.
2006;
130 (4 Suppl 2)
A77
-
11
Sharma P, Armstrong D, Bergman J. et al .
The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett’s esophagus: the Prague C and M criteria [abstract].
Gastroenterology.
2006;
130 (4 Suppl 2)
A121
-
12
Soni A, Sampliner R E, Sonnenberg A.
Screening for high-grade dysplasia in gastroesophageal reflux disease is it cost-effective?.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2000;
95
2086-2093
-
13
Inadomi J M, Sampliner R, Lagergren J. et al .
Screening and surveillance for Barrett’s esophagus in high-risk groups: a cost-utility analysis.
Ann Intern Med.
2003;
138
176-186
-
14
Sharma P, McQuaid K, Dent J. et al .
A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus: the AGA Chicago workshop.
Gastroenterology.
2004;
127
310-330
-
15
Lin O, Schembre D, Kozarek R.
Blinded comparison of esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux [abstract].
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
AB103
-
16
Sharma P, Rastogi A, Esquivel R. et al .
Accuracy of wireless capsule endoscopy for the detection of Barrett’s esophagus [abstract].
Gastroenterology.
2006;
130 (4 Suppl 2)
A262
-
17
Sampliner R E. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology .
Updated guidelines for the diagnosis, surveillance and therapy of Barrett’s esophagus.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2002;
97
1888-1895
-
18
Levine D S, Haggitt R C, Blount P L. et al .
An endoscopic biopsy protocol can differentiate high-grade dysplasia from early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus.
Gastroenterology.
1993;
105
40-50
-
19
Kariv R, Plesec T, Bronner M. et al .
The Seattle protocol for high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: it may not be as good as we think [abstract].
Gastroenterology.
2006;
130 (4 Suppl 2)
A120
-
20
Puli S, Rastogi A, Mathur S. et al .
Development of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and high grade dysplasia undergoing surveillance: a meta-analysis and systematic review [abstract].
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63(5)
AB83
-
21
Sampliner R E, Fennerty B, Garewal H S.
Reversal of Barrett’s esophagus with acid suppression and multipolar electrocoagulation: preliminary results.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1996;
44
532-535
-
22
Swisher S G, Deford L, Merriman K W. et al .
Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
2000;
119
1126-1132
-
23
Peters F, Curvers W, Kara M. et al .
Stepwise radical endoscopic resection for complete removal of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia [abstract].
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
AB133
-
24
Peters F, van Ball J, Rygiel A. et al .
Stepwise endoscopic resection of the whole Barrett’s esophagus in patients with early neoplasia effectively removes all genetic alterations from the esophageal epithelium [abstract].
Gastroenterology.
2006;
130 (4 Suppl 2)
A129
-
25
Overholt B F, Lightdale C J, Wang K K. et al .
Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium for ablation of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: international, partially blinded, randomized phase III trial.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
62
488-498
-
26
Overholt B, Wang K, Burdick S. et al .
A 5-year randomized phase III trial of efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy using porfimer sodium in high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus [abstract].
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
AB84
-
27
Pech O, Behrens A, May A. et al .
Curative endoscopic therapy for Barrett’s early cancer and high grade dysplasia: long-term results in 304 patients [abstract].
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
AB84
-
28
Fleischer D, Sharma V, Reymunde A. et al .
Circumferential RF ablation for non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus (NDBE) using the HALO360 ablation system (AIM trial): one-year follow-up of 100 patients [abstract].
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
AB127
P. Sharma, M. D.
Gastroenterology Section 111
Veterans Association Medical Center · 4801 East Linwood Boulevard · Kansas City, Missouri · USA
Fax: +1-816-922-4692
Email: psharma@kumc.edu