Ultrasound Evaluation of the Shoulder

ABSTRACT

This article discusses ultrasound examination of the shoulder and highlights some of its utility. The focus is on normal shoulder anatomy and pathology involving the rotator cuff, biceps tendon, and other related miscellaneous conditions.

Musculoskeletal ultrasound - musculoskeletal sonography - ultrasound shoulder

REFERENCES

• 1 Middleton W D, Payne W T, Teefey S A, Hildebolt C F, Rubin D A, Yamaguchi K. Sonography and MRI of the shoulder: comparison of patient satisfaction.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;  183(5) 1449-1452
• 2 Rutten M J, Jager G J, Blickman J G. US of the rotator cuff: pitfalls, limitations, and artifacts.  Radiographics. 2006;  26(2) 589-604
• 3 Ptaznik R. Sonography of the Shoulder. In: Van Holsbeeck MT, Introcaso JH Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO; Mosby 1991: 463-516
• 4 American College of Radiology .ACR practice guideline for the performance of a shoulder ultrasound examination. ACR Practice Guideline rev 2003 657-659 http://Available at: www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/Ultrasound/ACRPracticeGuidelineforthePerformanceofaShoulderUltrasoundExaminationDoc4.aspx Accessed May 2007
• 5 Strobel K, Zanetti M, Nagy L, Hodler J. Suspected rotator cuff lesions: tissue harmonic imaging versus conventional US of the shoulder.  Radiology. 2004;  230 243-249
• 6 Toshiaki A, Itoi E, Minagawa H et al.. Cross-sectional area of the tendon and the muscle of the biceps brachii in shoulders with rotator cuff tears: a study of 14 cadaveric shoulders.  Acta Orthop. 2005;  76(4) 509-512
• 7 Morag Y, Jacobson J A, Lucas D, Miller B, Brigido M K, Jamadar D A. US appearance of the rotator cable with histologic correlation: preliminary results.  Radiology. 2006;  241(2) 485-491
• 8 Keats T E, Pope T L. The acromioclavicular joint: normal variation and the diagnosis of dislocation.  Skeletal Radiol. 1988;  17(3) 159-162
• 9 Brewer B J. Aging of the rotator cuff.  Am J Sports Med. 1979;  7(2) 102-110
• 10 Yamaguchi K, Ditsios K, Middleton W D, Hildebolt C F, Galatz L M, Teefey S A. The demographic and morphological features of rotator cuff disease. a comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic shoulders.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;  88(8) 1699-1704
• 11 Middleton W D, Reinus W R, Totty W G, Melson G L, Murphy W A. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff and biceps tendon.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;  68 440-450
• 12 Teefey S A, Rubin D A, Middleton W D, Hildebolt C F, Leibold R A, Yamaguchi K. Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;  86-A(4) 708-716
• 13 Jacobson J A, Lancaster S, Prasad A, van Holsbeeck M T, Craig J G, Kolowich P. Full-thickness and partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears: value of US signs in diagnosis.  Radiology. 2004;  230(1) 234-242
• 14 Teefey S A, Hasan S A, Middleton W D, Patel M, Wright R W, Yamaguchi K. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. A comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;  82(4) 498-504
• 15 Wiener S N, Seitz Jr W H. Sonography of the shoulder in patients with tears of the rotator cuff: accuracy and value for selecting surgical options.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;  160(1) 103-107 discussion 109-110
• 16 Gibbon W. Ultrasound of the shoulder. In: McNally E Practical Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. London; Elsevier 2005: 59-83
• 17 Strobel K, Hodler J, Meyer D C, Pfirrmann C W, Pirkl C, Zanetti M. Fatty atrophy of supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles: accuracy of US.  Radiology. 2005;  237(2) 584-589
• 18 van Holsbeeck M T, Kolowich P A, Eyler W R et al.. US depiction of partial-thickness tear of the rotator cuff.  Radiology. 1995;  197(2) 443-446
• 19 Seibold C J, Mallisee T A, Erickson S J, Boynton M D, Raasch W G, Timins M E. Rotator cuff: evaluation with US and MR imaging.  Radiographics. 1999;  19(3) 685-705
• 20 Bureau N J, Beauchamp M, Cardinal E, Brassard P. Dynamic sonography evaluation of shoulder impingement syndrome.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;  187(1) 216-220
• 21 Gibbon W. Ultrasound of the shoulder. In: McNally E Practical Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. London; Elsevier 2005: 59-83
• 22 Read J W, Perko M. Shoulder ultrasound: diagnostic accuracy for impingement syndrome, rotator cuff tear, and biceps tendon pathology.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;  7(3) 264-271
• 23 Newman J S, Adler R S, Bude R O, Rubin J M. Detection of soft-tissue hyperemia: value of power Doppler sonography.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;  163(2) 385-389
• 24 Rockwood C, Uhtoff H K, Dervin G et al.. Calcifying tendinitis. In: Rockwood C, Matsen F III, Wirth M, Lippitt S The Shoulder. 3rd ed. Philadelphia; WB Saunders 2004: 1033
• 25 Stoller D, Wolf E, Li A et al.. The shoulder. In: Stoller D Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia; Lippincott 2007: 1429
• 26 Gibbon W. Ultrasound of the shoulder. In: McNally E Practical Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. London; Elsevier 2005: 59-83
• 27 van Holsbeeck M, Strouse P J. Sonography of the shoulder: evaluation of the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;  160 561-564
• 28 Gibbon W. Ultrasound of the shoulder. In: McNally E Practical Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. London; Elsevier 2005: 59-83
• 29 Farin P U. Sonography of the biceps tendon of the shoulder: normal and pathologic findings.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1996;  24(6) 309-316
• 30 Neviaser R J, Neviaser T J. The frozen shoulder. Diagnosis and management.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;  223 59-64
• 31 Lee J C, Sykes C, Saifuddin A, Connell D. Adhesive capsulitis: sonographic changes in the rotator cuff interval with arthroscopic correlation.  Skeletal Radiol. 2005;  34(9) 522-527
• 32 Ptasznik R. Sonography of the shoulder. In: van Holsbeeck M, Introcaso J Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO; Mosby 2001: 463-516
• 33 Alasaarela E, Suramo I, Tervonen O, Lahde S, Takalo R, Hakala M. Evaluation of humeral head erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and plain radiography.  Br J Rheumatol. 1998;  37(11) 1152-1156