Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2008; 25(2): 085-089
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1004827
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Prediction of Duration of Active Labor in Nulliparous Women at Term

Maddalena Incerti1 , Anna Locatelli1 , Alessandro Ghidini1 , Elena Ciriello1 , Silvia Malberti1 , Sara Consonni1 , John C. Pezzullo2
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
  • 2Department of Pharmacology and Biostatistics, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 December 2007 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

We have assessed the independent predictors of duration of active labor in nulliparous women at term. Using a cohort of 1067 nulliparae in spontaneous labor at > 37.0 weeks with singleton fetuses in vertex presentation, multivariate analysis was used to identify independent predictors of duration of active labor. Duration of active labor was 4.1 ± 2.4 hours. Stepwise linear regression selected 10 independent predictors of duration of active labor: gestational age at delivery (p < 0.001), race (p = 0.014), obstetric risk factors (p = 0.022), amniotomy (p < 0.001), fundal height (p = 0.005), cervical dilation on admission (p < 0.001), frequency of contractions (p < 0.001), station of presenting part (p < 0.001), oxytocin (p < 0.001), and epidural use (p < 0.001). A prediction formula incorporating the 10 predictors accounted for 51% of the total variance of the observed duration of active labor. Ten variables are independent predictors of duration of active labor; when incorporated in a prediction formula they account for > 50% of the variability of duration of labor in nulliparous women.

KEYWORDS

Active labor - nulliparous - partogram - curve of labor - prolonged labor

REFERENCES

  • 1 Philpott R H, Castle W M. Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae.  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972a;  79 599-602
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Philpott R H, Castle W M. Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae.  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972b;  79 592-598
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Friedman E A. Labor in multiparas: A graphicostatistical analysis.  Obstet Gynecol. 1956;  8 691-703
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Friedman E A. Labor: Clinical Evaluation and Management. New York; Appleton-Century-Crofts 1978
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Beazley J M, Kurjak A. Influence of a partograph on the active management of labor.  Lancet. 1972;  19 348-351
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Menticoglou S M, Manning F, Harman C, Morrison I. Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;  173 906-912
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Rouse D J, Owen J, Hauth J C. Active-phase labor arrest: oxytocin augmentation for at least 4 hours.  Obstet Gynecol. 1999;  93 323-328
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Rouse D J, Owen J, Savage K G, Hauth J C. Active phase labor arrest: revisiting the 2-hour minimum.  Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  98 550-554
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Impey L, Hobson J, O'Herlihy C. Graphic analysis of actively managed labor: prospective computation of labor progression in 500 consecutive nulliparous women in spontaneous labor at term.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  183 438-443
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Rinehart B K, Terrone D A, Hudson C, Isler C M, Larmon J E, Perry Jr K G. Lack of utility of standard labor curves in the prediction of progression during labor induction.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  182 1520-1526
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Zhang J, Troendle J, Yancey M K. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;  187 824-828
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Devoe L D, Samuel S, Prescott P, Work B A. Predicting the duration of the first stage of spontaneous labor using a neural network.  J Matern Fetal Med. 1996;  5 256-261
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Albers L L. The duration of labor in healthy women.  J Perinatol. 1999;  19 114-119
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Zhang J, Yancey M K, Klebanoff M A, Schwarz J, Schweitzer D. Does epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase risk of cesarean delivery? A natural experiment.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  185 128-134
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Boylan P. Intrapartum fetal monitoring.  Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;  1 73-95
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Albers L L, Shiff M, Gorwoda J G. The length of active labor in normal pregnancies.  Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  87 355-359
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Tuck S M, Cardozo L D, Studd J WW, Gibb D MF. Obstetric characteristics in different racial groups.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983;  90 892-897
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Thorp J A, Hu D H, Albin RM, et al.. The effect of intrapartum epidural anesthesia on nulliparous labor: A randomized, controlled prospective trial.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;  169 851-858
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Alexander J M, Sharma S K, McIntire D D, Leveno K J. Epidural analgesia lengthens the Friedman active phase of labor.  Obstet Gynecol. 2002;  100 46-50
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Clark A, Carr D, Loyd G, Cook V, Spinnato J. The influence of epidural analgesia on cesarean delivery rates: a randomized, prospective clinical trial.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  179 1527-1533
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Salim R, Nachum Z, Moscovici R, Lavee M, Shalev E. Continuous compared with intermittent epidural infusion on progress of labor and patient satisfaction.  Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  106 301-306
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Nuthalapaty F S, Rouse D J, Owen J. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction.  Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  103 452-456
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle J F, Savitz D A, Siega-Riz A M. Maternal prepregnancy overweight and obesity and the pattern of labor progression in term nulliparous women.  Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  104 943-951
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 O'Driscoll K, Stronge J M, Minogue M. Active management of labor.  BMJ. 1973;  3 135-137
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar

Maddalena IncertiM.D. 

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Solferino 16

20052 Monza (MI), Italy; reprints not available from the author