The Japanese Experience with Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) is generally touted to be a less invasive operation that offers the advantages of less postoperative pain and an earlier return to work compared with conventional open carpal tunnel release (OCTR). ETCR, however, does require special new skills that preferably should be acquired by practice on cadavers before clinical use. Because access to fresh cadavers is restricted in Japan, here we have to gain this experience in actual clinical cases with the assistance of another surgeon who is familiar with the technique. In contradistinction, a “mini” open technique can be learned stepwise just by shortening the conventional incision of OCTR during one's own clinical experience. Because reimbursement for ECTR was recently raised to be 1.5 times that for OCTR in Japan, that factor alone might make ECTR more popular in a few years. However, at least for the present, the mini open technique is still less costly without the associated risks of complications inherent with ETCR and has proved for the time being to be more suitable for the current medical climate in Japan.

Carpal tunnel syndrome - one-portal - two-portal - endoscopic carpal tunnel release - mini open carpal tunnel release

REFERENCES

• 1 Takagi K. Arthroscopy.  J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1939;  359-384 441-466 , [in Japanese]
• 2 Shahriaree H. O'Connor's textbook of arthroscopic surgery. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA; J.B. Lippincott 1984
• 3 Okutsu I, Ninomiya S, Matsuyama M et al.. Subcutaneous operation and examination under universal endoscope.  J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1987;  61 491-498 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 4 Okutsu I, Ninomiya S, Takatori Y, Ugawa Y. Endoscopic management of carpal tunnel syndrome.  Arthroscopy. 1989;  5 11-18
• 5 Chow JCY. Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament: a new technique for carpal tunnel syndrome.  Arthroscopy. 1989;  5 19-24
• 6 Hallock G G, Lutz D A. Prospective comparison of minimal incision “open” and two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;  96 941-947
• 7 Jacobsen M B, Rahme H. A prospective, randomized study with an independent observer comparing open carpal tunnel release with endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1996;  21 202-204
• 8 Agee J M, Peimer C A, Pyrek J D, Walsh W E. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a prospective study of complications and surgical experience.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1995;  20 165-171
• 9 Nakashima H, Teramoto K, Hirano T, Takeda H, Yonemitzu H. A comparative study of the conventional and the endoscopic approach to carpal tunnel syndrome. J Jpn Soc Surg.  Hand. 1996;  13 724-727 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 10 Hamanaka I, Okutsu I, Takatori Y, Tanabe T, Ninomiya S. Long term follow-up results of USE system management of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 1996;  13 721-723 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 11 Kimura H, Sasa M, Izumiyama K, Beppu M, Aoki H. Complications and recurrence after the endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 2001;  28 398-401 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 12 Hiura Y, Oda T, Doi K, Mizoue H, Kawai S. Comparison of endoscopic and conventional procedure for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 1995;  12 383-386 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 13 Yamashita H, Tanaka J, Nakano T, Negoro H, Nakano K. A clinical study of surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 1988;  5 117-120 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 14 Okutsu I, Hamanaka I, Tanabe T, Ninomiya S, Takatori Y. Long-term follow-up results of carpal tunnel syndrome in long-term haemodialysis patients using the USE system.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 1996;  13 655-658 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 15 Chow JCY. The Chow technique of endoscopic release of the carpal ligament for carpal tunnel syndrome: four years of clinical results.  Arthroscopy. 1993;  9 301-314
• 16 Nakao Y, Horiuchi Y, Takayama S, Okuyama N. Endoscopic release of transverse carpal ligament. Surgical technique for a reliable and safe procedure.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 1997;  14 690-693
• 17 Okutsu I, Hamanaka I, Yoshida A. How to perform endoscopic carpal tunnel release with fewer complications using the USE system.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 2005;  22 1-5 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 18 Ikeda K, Okada K, Tomita K, Yoshimura M, Tamauchi S. Complications of the one portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 1997;  14 650-653 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 19 Kunou M. An anatomical study of the carpal tunnel for endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1994;  68 878-884
• 20 Seiler III J G, Barnes K, Gelberman R H, Chalidapong P. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: an anatomic study of the two-incision method in human cadavers.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1992;  17 996-1002
• 21 Lee D H, Masear V R, Meyer R D, Stevens D M, Colgin S. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a cadaveric study.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1992;  17A 1003-1008
• 22 Kimura H, Beppu M, Sasa M, Nagao Y, Aoki H. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release for carpal tunnel syndrome in hemodialysis patients.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 1995;  12 387-390 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 23 Kimura H, Beppu M, Matsushita K, Yoshida R, Aoki H. Recurrent cases of endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 2004;  21 653-655 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 24 Okutsu I, Hamanaka I, Yoshida A, Motomura T, Motimoto S. Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome in long-term haemodialysis patients.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 2004;  21 160-164 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 25 Hamanaka I, Okutsu I, Chiyokura Y, Yoshida A, Seo R. Clinical recovery rates in endoscopic re-operation of recurrent cases after open or endoscopic carpal canal decompression in long-term hemodialysis patients.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 2003;  20 72-75 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 26 Resnick C T, Miller B W. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release using the subligamentous two portal technique.  Contemp Orthop. 1991;  22 269-277
• 27 Brown M G, Keyser B, Rothenberg E S. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1992;  17 1009-1011
• 28 Viegas S F, Pollard A, Kaminski K. Carpal arch alteration and related clinical status after endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1992;  17 1012-1016
• 29 Yoshida A, Okutsu I, Hamanaka I. What is real minimally invasive surgery in carpal tunnel syndrome? Endoscopic surgery.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 2004;  21 165-168 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 30 Brown R A, Gelberman R H, Seiler J G et al.. Carpal tunnel release. A prospective, randomized assessment of open and endoscopic methods.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;  75 1265-1275
• 31 Wilson K M. Double incision open technique for carpal tunnel release: an alternative to endoscopic release.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1994;  19 907-912
• 32 Konishiike T, Hashizume H. Clinical analysis of pillar pain after endoscopic carpal tunnel release: the Okutsu method.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 2005;  22 6-9 , [in Japanese, English abstract]
• 33 Ariyan S, Watson H K. The palmar approach for the visualization and release of the carpal tunnel: an analysis of 429 cases.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;  60 539-547
• 34 Nishiura Y, Tsujino A, Ochiai N, Ito Y, Horiuchi Y. Anatomical variations of the recurrent branch of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 1998;  15 447-451 , [in Japanese, English abstract]