„Use of Self” in der Ergotherapie: Beziehungen bewusst gestalten

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung: Verschiedene Forschungsstudien hoben die Bedeutung der Rolle des Use of self in der Ergotherapie hervor. Die zunehmende Zahl derartiger Studien deutet auf die Beziehung zwischen Klienten und Therapeuten als Schlüsseldeterminante für den Behandlungserfolg hin.

Methode: Im Rahmen der geschichtlichen Entwicklung der Ergotherapie werden ein Überblick der ergotherapeutischen Fachliteratur zum Thema Use of self erstellt, Wissenslücken in diesem Bereich identifiziert und ein konzeptuelles Praxismodell vorgeschlagen, das sich mit den von der Fachliteratur unbeantworteten Fragen auseinandersetzt. Der Schwerpunkt des nicht systematischen Reviews liegt auf der Sichtweise der Autorin.

Ergebnisse: Auf der Grundlage eines Literaturreviews wurden Lücken im existierenden Wissen über den Use of self identifiziert. Die Auseinandersetzung mit diesen Fragen erfolgte anhand des Modells der intentionalen Beziehungen, eines vorläufigen konzeptuellen Praxismodells, das als Richtlinie für das Clinical Reasoning in diesem vernachlässigten Bereich dienen soll.

Schlussfolgerung: Obwohl das Modell der intentionalen Beziehungen nicht alle Aspekte des Use of self in der Ergotherapie berücksichtigt, wird es zu neuen Konzepten und konkreten, einsetzbaren klinischen Fertigkeiten führen, die zur Pflege bzw. Verbesserung von Beziehungen in der Ergotherapie erforderlich sind.

Abstract

Introduction: Different research studies emphasised the important role of use of self in occupational therapy. The growing number of such studies indicates that the client-therapist relationship is a key determinant of overall treatment success.

Method: Within the history of the field of occupational therapy an overview of the most prominent theoretical and scientific contributions regarding use of self is given, gaps in the field’s knowledge are identified and a conceptual practice model that addresses unanswered questions within the literature is proposed. This unsystematic literature review emphasises the author’s viewpoint.

Results: Based on the literature review gaps in existing knowledge about use of self were identified. These questions were discussed by proposing the intentional relationship model, a preliminary conceptual practice model to guide clinical reasoning in this neglected area.

Conclusion: Though the intentional relationship model does not address all questions related to use of self in occupational therapy, it provides new concepts and concrete usable clinical skills that are necessary to foster and improve relationships in occupational therapy.

Beziehung - use of self - Clinical reasoning - Modell der intentionalen Beziehungen

relationship - use of self - clinical reasoning - intentional relationship model

Literatur

• 1 American Psychiatric Association .Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Text Revision. IV. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association Arlington 2000
• 2 Ayres-Rosa S, Hasselkus B R. Connecting with patients: The personal experience of professional helping.  The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research. 1996;  16 245-260
• 3 Baum C M. Occupational therapists put care in the health system.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1980;  34 505-516
• 4 Beck J. Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond. New York; Guilford Press 1995
• 5 Bing R K. Eleanor Clark Slagle Lectureship 1981: Occupational therapy revisited: A paraphrastic journey.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1981;  35 499-518
• 6 Bockoven J S. Occupational therapy - a historical perspective: Legacy of moral treatment - 1800’s to 1910.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1971;  25 223-225
• 7 Clark F. Occupation embedded in a real life: Interweaving occupational science and occupational therapy, 1993 Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1993;  47 1067-1078
• 8 Cole B, McLean V. Therapeutic relationships re-defined.  Occupational Therapy in Mental Health. 2003;  2 33-56
• 9 Crepeau E B. Achieving intersubjective understanding: Examples from an occupational therapy treatment session.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1991;  45 1016-1025
• 10 Devereaux E B. Occupational therapy’s challenge: The caring relationship.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1984;  38 791-798
• 11 Duncan E AS. Foundations for Practice in Occupational Therapy. London; Elsevier 2006 4th ed
• 12 Fleming M H. The therapist with the three-track mind.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1991;  45 1007-1014
• 13 Gilfoyle E M. Caring: A philosophy for practice.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1980;  34 517-521
• 14 Jonsson H, Josephsson S, Kielhofner G. Narratives and experience in an occupational transition: a longitudinal study of the retirement process.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2001;  55 424-432
• 15 Kielhofner G, Burke J. A model of human occupation. Part 1: Conceptual framework and content.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1980;  34 572-581
• 16 Kielhofner G. Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. Philadelphia; FA Davis 1997 2nd ed
• 17 Kielhofner G. The Model of Human Occupation, Theory and Application. Maryland, Lippincott; Williams & Wilkins 2002 3 rd ed
• 18 Kielhofner G. Conceptual Foundations of Occupational Therapy. Philadelphia; FA Davis 2004 3 rd ed
• 19 King L J. Creative caring.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1980;  34 522-528
• 20 Lyons K D, Crepeau E B. The clinical reasoning of an occupational therapy assistant.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2001;  55 577-581
• 21 Mattingly C, Fleming M H. Clinical Reasoning: Forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice. Philadelphia; F. A. Davis 1994
• 22 Mattingly C, Gillette N. Anthropology, Occupational Therapy, and Action Research.  The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1991;  45 972-978
• 23 Mattingly C. The narrative nature of clinical reasoning.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1991;  45 998-1005
• 24 Mattingly C. The narrative nature of clinical reasoning. Mattingly C, Flemming MH Clinical Reasoning: Forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice Philadelphia; F. A. Davis 1994
• 25 Mosey A C. Three frames of reference for mental health. Thorofare; Slack 1970
• 26 Peloquin S M. Moral treatment: Contexts considered.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1989;  43 537-544
• 27 Peloquin S M. Sustaining the art of practice in occupational therapy.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1989;  43 219-226
• 28 Peloquin S M. The patient-therapist relationship in occupational therapy: Understanding visions and images.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1990;  44 13-21
• 29 Peloquin S M. The depersonalization of patients: A profile gleaned from narratives.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1993;  47 830-837
• 30 Peloquin S M. The fullness of empathy: Reflections and illustrations.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1995;  49 24-31
• 31 Peloquin S M. Reclaiming the vision of reaching for heart as well as hands.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2002;  56 517-526
• 32 Peloquin S M. The therapeutic relationship: Manifestations and challenges in occupational therapy. Crepeau EB, Cohn ES, Boyt Schell BA Willard & Spackman’s Occupational Therapy Philadelphia; Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins 2003 10th ed
• 33 Rogers J C. Clinical reasoning: The ethics, science, and art. 1983 Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1983;  37 601-616
• 34 Schell B A, Cervero R M. Clinical reasoning in occupational therapy: An integrative review.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1993;  47 605-610
• 35 Schell B A. Clinical reasoning: The basis of practice. Crepeau EB, Cohn ES, Boyt Schell BA Willard & Spackman’s Occupational Therapy Philadelphia; Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins 2003 10th ed
• 36 Schwartz K B. The history of occupational therapy. Crepeau EB, Cohn ES, Boyt Schell BA Willard & Spackman’s Occupational Therapy Philadelphia; Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins 2003 10th ed
• 37 Schwartzberg S L. Interactive reasoning in the process of occupational therapy. Upper Saddle River; Pearson Education 2002
• 38 Shannon P D. The derailment of occupational therapy.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1977;  31 229-234
• 39 Summerfield G, Forsyth K, Taylor R R. Therapeutic Use of Self within Paediatric Practice.  2007 (submitted for publication); 
• 40 Taylor R R, Lee S, Kielhofner G. et al . A Nationwide Survey of Therapeutic Use of Self in Occupational Therapy.  2007 (submitted for publication); 
• 41 Taylor R R. The Intentional Relationship: Occupational Therapy and Use of Self. Philadelphia; F. A. Davis (in press)
• 42 Townsend E. Reflections on power and justice in enabling occupation.  Revue Canadienne d’Ergothérapie. 2003;  70 74-87
• 43 Yerxa E J. Occupational therapy’s role in creating a future climate of caring.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1980;  34 529-679