Background and study aims: Both endoscopic ultrasound- (EUS-) guided tissue sampling techniques, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and Trucut biopsy, have advantages and limitations. The aim of this study was to develop a strategy of combining these two EUS-guided sampling techniques in order to maximize the diagnostic accuracy and minimize duplication.
Patients and methods: In this multicenter study we performed ”dual sampling” (i. e. with both FNA and Trucut biopsy) in 95 patients during phase 1 of the study and ”sequential sampling” (i. e. performing FNA only when Trucut biopsy tissue cores were macroscopically inadequate) in 72 patients during phase 2.
Results: During the study period, 167/401 patients referred for EUS-guided sampling were eligible for the study; only solid lesions were included. In 143/167 patients (86 %), sampling was performed via the transesophageal or transgastric routes. When the dual sampling strategy was used, an accurate diagnosis was achieved in 78/95 patients by FNA, compared with 85/95 by Trucut biopsy (P = 0.21). The combined accuracy of the dual sampling strategy was higher than FNA alone (88/95 vs. 78/95, P = 0.048), but was not significantly higher than Trucut biopsy alone (88/95 vs. 85/95, P = 0.61). Using the sequential sampling strategy, an accurate diagnosis was achieved in 66/72 patients (92 %) compared with 88/95 (93 %) for dual sampling (P = 1.0), and 8/72 patients (11 %) had to undergo FNA after Trucut biopsy failed to obtain an adequate sample. One patient with mediastinal tuberculosis developed a cold abscess following Trucut biopsy.
Conclusion: A sequential sampling strategy, in which EUS-guided Trucut biopsy is attempted first, and FNA performed only when Trucut biopsy fails to obtain a macroscopically adequate sample, achieves a diagnostic accuracy of 92 %, with 11 % of patients requiring both sampling procedures.
References
-
1
Wiersema M J, Hawes R H, Tao L C. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasonography as an adjunct to fine needle aspiration cytology of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1992;
38
35-39
-
2
Wiersema M J, Vilmann P, Giovannini M. et al .
Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment.
Gastroenterology.
1997;
112
1087-1095
-
3
Rösch T.
Endoscopic ultrasonography [review].
Br J Surg.
1997;
84
1329-1331
-
4
Williams D B, Sahai A V, Aabacken L. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience.
Gut.
1999;
44
720-726
-
5
O’Toole D, Palazzo L, Arotcarena R. et al .
Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
53
470-474
-
6
Layfield L J, Bentz J S, Gopez E V.
Immediate on-site interpretation of fine-needle aspiration smears: a cost and compensation analysis.
Cancer.
2001;
93
319-322
-
7
Klapman J B, Logrono R, Dye C E, Waxman I.
Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2003;
98
1289-1294
-
8
Chang K J, Nguyen P, Erickson R A. et al .
The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1997;
45
387-393
-
9
Ribeiro A, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema L M. et al .
EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry in the diagnosis of lymphoma.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
53
485-491
-
10
Rader A E, Avery A, Wait C L. et al .
Fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours using morphology, immunocytochemistry, and mutational analysis of c-kit.
Cancer.
2001;
93
269-275
-
11
Stelow E B, Stanley M W, Bardales R H. et al .
Intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: the findings and limitations of cytologic samples obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.
Am J Clin Pathol.
2003;
120
398-404
-
12
Wiersema M J, Gatzimos K, Nisi R, Wiersema L M.
Staging of non-Hodgkin’s gastric lymphoma with endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and flow cytometry.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1996;
44
734-736
-
13
Wiersema M J, Levy M J, Harewood G C. et al .
Initial experience with EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies of perigastric organs.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
56
275-278
-
14
Larghi A, Verna E C, Stavropoulos S N. et al .
EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2004;
59
185-190
-
15
Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N. et al .
Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration.
Endoscopy.
2004;
36
397-401
-
16
Levy M J, Wiersema M J.
EUS-guided Trucut biopsy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
62
417-426
-
17
Wight C O, Zaitoun A M, Boulton-Jones J R. et al .
Improving diagnostic yield of biliary brushings cytology for pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma.
Cytopathology.
2004;
15
87-92
-
18
Stelow E B, Bardales R H, Stanley M W.
Pitfalls in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and how to avoid them.
Adv Anat Pathol.
2005;
12
62-73
-
19
Storch I, Jorda M, Thurer R. et al .
Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
64
505-511
-
20
Wildi S M, Hoda R S, Fickling W. et al .
Diagnosis of benign cysts of the mediastinum: the role and risks of EUS and FNA.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;
58
362-368
-
21
Annema J T, Veselic M, Versteegh M I, Rabe K F.
Mediastinitis caused by EUS-FNA of a bronchogenic cyst.
Endoscopy.
2003;
35
791-793
G. P. Aithal, MD, PhD
D Floor, South Block Queen’s Medical Centre
Nottingham NG7 2UH
United Kingdom
Fax: +44-115-9709012
Email: guru.aithal@nuh.nhs.uk