Download PDF
Kardiologie up2date 2007; 3(3): 251-264
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966773
Bildgebung und interventionelle Techniken

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Diagnostische Möglichkeiten von Multislice-CT und MRT bei Patienten mit akutem Thoraxschmerz

Thorsten  Dill, Christian  W.  Hamm
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 September 2007 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Kernaussagen

  • Der akute Thoraxschmerz gehört zu den häufigsten Aufnahmediagnosen in Deutschland und erfordert eine schnelle Abklärung der umfangreichen Differenzialdiagnosen.

  • Die bildgebende Diagnostik spielt in der Differenzierung zwischen kardial und nicht kardial bedingtem Thoraxschmerz eine zentrale Rolle.

  • Bei kardial bedingtem akutem Thoraxschmerz gibt es bisher wenig Erfahrung mit dem Einsatz der kardialen MRT und der neueren Generationen der Mehrzeilen-CT.

  • Das Potenzial der MRT und MSCT in der kardialen Diagnostik, in Ergänzung zu der bereits etablierten Indikation bei Verdacht auf nicht kardial bedingten akuten Throaxschmerz, hat dazu geführt, dass sog. Chest Pain Units geschaffen werden, in denen eine schnelle diagnostische Abklärung der Differenzialdiagnostik erfolgt. Prospektive Studien werden zeigen müssen, ob die ersten positiven Erfahrungen dieses Konzepts in der Praxis Bestand haben.

Literatur

  • 1 Nagel E, Bauer W, Sechtem U. et al . Positionspapier: Klinische Indikationen für die kardiovaskuläre Magnetresonanztomographie (CMR).  Clin Res Cardiol Suppl. 2007;  2 77-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hoffmann M H, Shi H, Schmitz B L. et al . Non-invasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography.  JAMA. 2005;  293 2473-2478
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T. et al . Image qualtity and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary artery imaging with 16-detector slice computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution.  Heart. 2005;  91 938-941
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K. et al . Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0. 6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses.  Am J Cardiol. 2006;  97 343-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ehara M, Surmely J F, Kawai M. et al . Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography.  Circ J. 2006;  70 564-571
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Raff G L, Gallagher M J, O’Neill W W, Goldstein J A. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;  46 552-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Pugliese F, Mollet N R, Runza G. et al . Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris.  Eur Radiol. 2006;  16 575-582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A. et al . Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience.  Eur Heart J. 2005;  26 1482-1487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A. et al . Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control.  Eur Radiol. 2006;  16(12) 2739-2747
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Busch S, Nikolaou K, Johnson T. et al . Quantification of coronary artery stenoses : Comparison of 64-slice and dual source CT angiography with cardiac catheterization.  Radiologe. 2007;  47 295-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Goldstein J A, Gallagher M J, O’Neill W W. et al . A randomized controlled trial of multislice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain.  J American Coll Cardiol. 2007;  49(8) 863-871
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ghersin E, Litmanovich D, Dragu R. et al . 16-MDCT coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography in acute chest pain syndrome: a blinded prospective study.  Am J Roengenol. 2006;  186(1) 177-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hoffmann U, Pena A J, Moselewski F. et al . MDCT in early triage of patients with acute chest pain.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;  187(5) 1240-1247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hoffmann U, Nagurney J T, Moselewski F. et al . Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain.  Circulation. 2006;  114 2251-2260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gallagher M J, Ross M A, Raff G L. et al . The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients.  Ann Emerg Med. 2006;  49 125-136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 White C S, Kuo D, Kelemen M. et al . Chest pain evaluation in the emergency department: can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation?.  Am J Roentgenol. 2005;  185 533-540
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Sato Y, Matsumoto N, Ichikawa M. et al . Efficacy of multislice computed tomography for the detection of acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department.  Circulation. 2005;  69 1047-1051
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Danias G, Roussakis A, Ioannidis J P. Diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance angiography as compared against conventional x-ray angiography : a meta-analysis.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;  44 1867-1876
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Plein S, Greenwood J P, Ridgway J P. et al . Assessment of Non-ST-Segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.  J American Coll Cardiol. 2004;  44 2173-2181
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kwong R Y, Schussheim A E, Rekharj S. et al . Detecting acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.  Circulation. 2003;  107 531-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ingkanisorn W P, Kwong R Y, Bohme N S. et al . Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;  47 1427-1432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kim R J, Fieno D S, Parrish T B. et al . Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function.  Circulation. 1999;  100 1992-2002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Abdel-Aty H, Zagrosek A, Schulz-Menger J. et al . Delayed enhancement and T2-weightetd cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging differentiate acute from chronical myocardial infarction.  Circulation. 2004;  109 2411-2416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hombach V, Grebe O, Merkle N. et al . Sequelae of acute myocardial infarction regarding cardiac structure and function and their prognostic significance as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.  Eur Heart J. 2005;  26 549-557.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lardo A C, Cordeiro M A, Silva C. et al . Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar.  Circulation. 2006;  113(3) 394-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mahrhold H, Goedecke C, Wagner A. et al . Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of human myocarditis: a comparison to histology and molecular pathology.  Circulation. 2004;  109 1250-1258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Abdel-Aty H, Boye P, Zagrosek A. et al . Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with acute suspected myocarditis: comparison of different approaches.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;  45 1815-1822
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Deetjen A, Conradi G, Möllmann S. et al . Value of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with Tako-Tsubo like left ventricular dysfunction.  J Cardiovasc Magn Res Imaging. 2006;  8 367-372
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Nienaber C A, Eagle K A. Aortic dissection: new frontiers in diagnosis and management: Part I: from etiology to diagnostic strategies.  Circulation. 2003;  108 628-635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Januzzi J L, Isselbacher E M, Fattori R. et al . Characterizing the young patient with aortic dissection: results from the International Registry of Aortic Dissection (IRAD).  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;  43 665-669
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Mehta R H, O’Gara P T, Bossone E. et al . Acute type A aortic dissection in the elderly: clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes in the current era.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;  40 685-692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Park S W, Hutchinson S, Mehta R H. et al . Association of painless acute aortic dissection with increased mortality.  Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;  79 1252-1257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Hagan P G, Nienaber C A, Isselbacher E M. et al . The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease.  JAMA. 2000;  283 897-903
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Nienaber C A, von Kodolitsch Y, Nicolas V. et al . The diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection by noninvasive imaging procedures.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  328 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 David T E, Feindel C M. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;  103 617-621
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Eggebrecht H, Nienaber C A, Neuhauser M. et al . Endovascular stent-graft placement in aortic dissection: a meta-analysis.  Eur Heart J. 2006;  27 489-498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 DeSanctis R W, Doroghazi R M, Austen W G. et al . Aortic dissection.  N Engl J Med. 1987;  317 1060-1067
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Kodolitsch Y von, Meinertz T, Nienaber C A. et al . Intramural hematoma of the aorta: predictors of progression to dissection and rupture.  Circulation. 2003;  107 1158-1163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Stein P D, Terrin M L, Hales C A. Clinical, laboratory, roentgenographic, electrocardiographic findings in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and no pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease.  Chest. 1991;  100 598-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Meignan M, Rosso J, Gauthier H. et al . Systemic lung scans reveal a high frequency of silent pulmonary embolismin patients with proximal deep venous thrombosis.  Arch Intern Med. 2000;  160 159-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Kluge A, Luboldt W, Bachmann G. Acute pulmonary embolism to the subsegmental level: diagnostic accuracy of three MRI techniques compared with 16-MDCT.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;  187(1) 7-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Kluge A, Gerriets T, Stolz E. et al . Pulmonary perfusion in acute pulmonary embolism: agreement of MRI and SPECT for lobar, segmental and subsegmental perfusion defects.  Acta Radiol. 2006;  47(9) 933-940
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

PD Dr. med. Thorsten Dill

Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH

Abteilung für Kardiologie

Benekestr. 2-8

61231 Bad Nauheim

Email: t.dill@kerckhoff-klinik.de

      >