ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the extent of exposure and surgical maneuverability provided by facial translocation and transtemporal approaches for access to the infratemporal fossa and anterolateral skull base. Materials and Methods: Surgical procedures were performed on five fresh frozen adult cadavers (ten sides) with no known pathology. Facial transfacial approaches with and without a mandibulotomy and transtemporal approaches were evaluated. Objective measures were (1) the distance from the surgical plane to designated anatomic landmarks and (2) the surgical angle of exposure. Results: Distances from the surgical plane to the anatomic reference points were comparable for most of the access procedures (3 to 6 cm). The extended midfacial translocation and bilateral facial translocation approaches did, however, provide a shorter operative distance (1 to 3 cm) for access to the infratemporal fossa and contralateral structures, respectively. The transtemporal approaches facilitate a better angle of exposure (74 to 84 degrees) to the petrotemporal region, while the transfacial approaches were superior for access to the infratemporal structures. Conclusions: Based on the results, we propose a clinical algorithm for selecting a surgical approach based on the position and extent of an infratemporal or petrotemporal lesion.
KEYWORDS
Infratemporal fossa - anterior skull base - lateral skull base - Fisch Type C - facial translocation - transzygomatic approach
REFERENCES
-
1
Fisch U.
Infratemporal fossa approach to tumors of the temporal bone and base of skull.
J Laryngol Otol.
1978;
92
949-967
-
2
Janecka I P, Sen C N, Sekhar L N, Arriaga M.
Facial translocation: a new approach to the cranial base.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1990;
103
413-419
-
3
Janecka I P.
Classification of facial translocation approach to the skull base.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1995;
112
579-585
-
4
Bejjani G K, Sullivan B, Salas-Lopez E et al..
Surgical anatomy of the infratemporal fossa: the styloid diaphragm revisited.
Neurosurgery.
1998;
43
842-853
-
5
Kennedy J D, Haines S J.
Review of skull base surgery approaches: with special reference to pediatric patients.
J Neurooncol.
1994;
20
291-312
-
6
Kumar A, Valvassori G, Jafar J, Mafee M.
Skull base lesions: a classification and surgical approaches.
Laryngoscope.
1986;
96
252-263
-
7
Ruckenstein M J, Denys D.
Lateral skull-base surgery: a review of recent advances in surgical approaches.
J Otolaryngol.
1998;
27
46-54
-
8
Gonzalez L F, Crawford N R, Horgan M A, Deshmukh P, Zabramski J M, Spetzler R F.
Working area and angle of attack in three cranial base approaches: pterional, orbitozygomatic and maxillary extension of the orbitozygomatic approach.
Neurosurgery.
2002;
50
550-555
-
9
Suhardja A S, Cusimano M D, Agur A MR.
Surgical exposure and resection of the vertical portion of the petrous internal carotid artery: anatomic study.
Neurosurgery.
2001;
49
665-670
-
10
Vrionis F D, Cano W G, Heilman C B.
Microsurgical anatomy of the infratemporal fossa as viewed laterally and superiorly.
Neurosurgery.
1996;
39
777-786
-
11
Aziz K MA, Sanan A, van Loveren H R, Tew J M, Keller J T, Pensak M L.
Petroclival meningiomas: predictive parameters for transpetrosal approaches.
Neurosurgery.
2000;
47
139-152
-
12 Arriaga M A. Transtemporal approaches. In: Janecka IP, Tiedemann K Skull Base Surgery: Anatomy, Biology, and Technology. Philadelphia; Lippincott-Raven 1997: 221-242
-
13
Honeybul S, Neil-Dwyer G, Evans B T, Lang D A.
The transzygomatic approach: an anatomic study.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
1997;
35
334-340
-
14
Guinto G, Abello J, Molina A et al..
Zygomatic-transmandibular approach for giant tumors of the infratemporal fossa and parapharyngeal space.
Neurosurgery.
1999;
45
1385-1398
-
15
Honeybul S, Neil-Dwyer G, Lees P D, Evans B T, Lang D A.
The orbitozygomatic infratemporal fossa approach: a quantitative anatomical study.
Acta Neurochir (Wien).
1996;
138
255-264
-
16
Ammirati M, Bernando A.
Analytical evaluation of complex anterior approaches to the cranial base: an anatomic study.
Neurosurgery.
1998;
43
1398-1408
-
17
Fisch U, Pillsbury H C.
Infratemporal fossa approach to lesions of the temporal bone and base of skull.
Arch Otolaryngol.
1979;
105
99-108
-
18
Lello G, Statham P, Steers J, McGurk M.
Craniofacial access to the anterior and middle cranial fossae and skull base.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg.
1997;
25
285-293
-
19
Moore C E, Ross D A, Marentette L J.
Critical pathways in anterior cranial base surgery.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1999;
121
113-118
-
20
Schwartz M S, Anderson G J, Horgan M A, Kellogg J X, McMenomey S O, Delshaw Jr J B.
Quantification of increased exposure resulting from orbital rim and orbitozygomatic osteotomy via the frontotemporal transsylvian approach.
J Neurosurg.
1999;
91
1020-1026
-
21
Spektor S, Anderson G J, McMenomey S O, Horgan M A, Kellogg J X, Delshaw Jr J B.
Quantitative description of the far-lateral transcondylar transtubercular approach to the foramen magnum and clivus.
J Neurosurg.
2000;
92
824-831
-
22
Horgan M A, Anderson G J, Kellogg J X et al..
Classification and quantification of the petrosal approach to the petroclival region.
J Neurosurg.
2000;
93
108-112
-
23
Cantore G, Ciappetta P, Delfini R.
Choice of neurosurgical approach in the treatment of cranial base lesions.
Neurosurg Rev.
1994;
17
109-125
-
24
Day J D.
Commentary on: Gonzalez LF, Crawford NR, Horgan MA, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Working area and angle of attack in three cranial base approaches: pterional, orbitozygomatic, and maxillary extension of the orbitozygomatic approach.
Neurosurgery.
2002;
50
555-557
discussion 555-557
-
25
Som P M, Shugar J M, Parisier S C.
A clinical-radiographic classification of skull basse lesions.
Laryngoscope.
1979;
89
1066-1076
Moni A KuriakoseM.D.
Chairman, Head and Neck Institute, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences
Elamakkara, Cochin, Kerala 682026, India
Email: mak12@nyu.edu
