Proximal Humerus Fractures: Treatment with Internal Locking System Plates

Abstract

Introduction: After surgery of proximal humerus fractures complications such as failure of osteosynthesis with bad functional outcome are often observed. We predict, that the treatment with an angular stable plate will reduce the risk of secondary dislocation. Patients and Methods: Eleven patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures, treated with the proximal humeral internal locking system plate (PHILOS, Synthes), including two patients who are treated for non-union of an earlier fracture. They were monitored clinically and radiologically for a mean of 8.4 months by the same surgeon who had operated the patient. Results: Average Constant Score at six months: 70.3; average range of motion: 121° flexion, 108° abduction, 21° external rotation and internal rotation lumbar vertebra (L) L 4-L 5. We observed one case of partial avascular necrosis, one case of complex regional pain syndrome I and two cases of non-union, one with a break of the plate. There were no infections. Conclusion: This implant provides good stability in treatment of displaced humeral head fractures with good clinical and radiological results, however with a high complication rate. These results remain be compared to other kind of treatments and implants.

Proximal humerus fracture - internal locking system plates - angular stablility - osteosynthesis

References

• 1 Bjorkenheim J M, Pajarinen J, Savolainen V. Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a locking compression plate: a retrospective evaluation of 72 patients followed for a minimum of 1 year.  Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;  75 741-745
• 2 Boughebri O, Havet E, Sanguina M, Daumas L, Jacob P, Zerkly B, Heissler P. Treatment of proximal humeral fractures by Telegraph® nail: prospective study of 34 cases.  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007;  93 325-332
• 3 Charalambous C P, Siddique I, Valluripalli K, Kovacevic M, Panose P, Srinivasan M, Marynissen H. Proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;  127 205-210
• 4 Chu S P, Kelsey J L, Keegan T H, Sternfeld B, Prill M, Quesenberry C P, Sidney S. Risk factors for proximal humerus fracture.  Am J Epidemiol. 2004;  160 360-367
• 5 Cuny C, Pfeffer F, Irrazi M, Chammas M, Empereur F, Berrichi A, Metais P, Beau P. A new locking nail for proximal humerus fractures: the Telegraph nail, technique and preliminary results.  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002;  88 62-67
• 6 Cuny C, Darbelley L, Touchard O, Irrazi M, Beau P, Berrichi A, Empereur F. Proximal 4-part humerus fractures treated by antegrade nailing with self-stabilizing screws: 31 cases.  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003;  89 507-514
• 7 Constant C R, Murley A H. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;  (214) 160-164
• 8 Fankhauser F, Boldin C, Schippinger G, Haunschmid C, Szyszkowitz R. A new locking plate for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;  (430) 176-181
• 9 Frigg R. Development of the Locking Compression Plate.  Injury. 2003;  34 Suppl 2 B 6-B 10
• 10 Fuchtmeier B, May R, Hente R, Maghsudi M, Volk M, Hammer J, Nerlich M, Prantl L. Proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis of intra and extramedullary implants.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;  127 441-447
• 11 Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP.  Injury. 2003;  34 Suppl 2 B 63-B 76
• 12 Gardner M J, Voos J E, Wanich T, Helfet D L, Lorich D G. Vascular implications of minimally invasive plating of proximal humerus fractures.  J Orthop Trauma. 2006;  20 602-607
• 13 Helmy N, Hintermann B. New trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;  (442) 100-108
• 14 Hente R, Kampshoff J, Kinner B, Fuchtmeier B, Nerlich M. Treatment of dislocated 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus with an angle-stabilizing fixation plate.  Unfallchirurg. 2004;  107 769-782
• 15 Hintermann B, Trouillier H H, Schafer D. Rigid internal fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus in older patients.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2000;  82 1107-1112
• 16 Iannotti J P, Ramsey M L, Williams Jr G R, Warner J J. Nonprosthetic management of proximal humeral fractures.  Instr Course Lect. 2004;  53 403-416
• 17 Kettler M, Biberthaler P, Braunstein V, Zeiler C, Kroetz M, Mutschler W. Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the PHILOS angular stable plate: Presentation of 225 cases of dislocated fractures.  Unfallchirurg. 2006;  109 1032-1040
• 18 Köstler W, Strohm P C, Südkamp N P. Die proximale Humerusfraktur im hohen Lebensalter - Versorgung mit der winkelstabilen Plattenosteosynthese.  Chirurg. 2003;  74 985-989
• 19 Koukakis A, Apostolou C D, Taneja T, Korres D S, Amini A. Fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the PHILOS plate: early experience.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;  (442) 115-120
• 20 Kristiansen B, Christensen S W. Plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1986;  57 320-323
• 21 Lill H, Bewer A, Korner J, Verheyden P, Hepp P, Krautheim I, Josten C. Conservative treatment of dislocated proximal humeral fractures.  Zentralbl Chir. 2001;  126 205-210
• 22 Lill H, Hepp P, Korner J, Kassi J P, Verheyden A P, Josten C, Duda G N. Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;  123 74-81
• 23 Lind T, Kroner K, Jensen J. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1989;  108 285-287
• 24 Lungershausen W, Bach O, Lorenz C O. Locking Plate Osteosynthesis for fractures of the proximal humerus.  Zentralbl Chir. 2003;  128 28-33
• 25 Movin T, Sjoden G O, Ahrengart L. Poor function after shoulder replacement in fracture patients. A retrospective evaluation of 29 patients followed for 2-12 years.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;  69 392-396
• 26 Mosekilde L. Osteoporosis and exercise.  Bone. 1995;  17 193-195
• 27 Neer 2nd  C S. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1970;  52 1077-1089
• 28 Neer 2nd  C S. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1970;  52 1090-1103
• 29 Rose S H, Melton 3rd  L J, Morrey B F, Ilstrup D M, Riggs B L. Epidemiologic features of humeral fractures.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;  (168) 24-30
• 30 Seide K, Triebe J, Faschingbauer M, Schulz A P, Puschel K, Mehrtens G, Jurgens C. Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus - A biomechanical study.  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007;  22 176-182
• 31 Smith E L, Gilligan C, McAdam M, Ensign C P, Smith P E. Deterring bone loss by exercise intervention in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.  Calcif Tissue Int. 1989;  44 312-321
• 32 Tolat A R, Amis A, Sinha J. Failure of humeral fracture fixation plate in a young patient using the Philos system: Case report.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;  15 e 44-e 47
• 33 Trupka A, Wiedemann E, Ruchholtz S, Brunner U, Habermeyer P, Schweiberer L. Dislocated multiple fragment fractures of the head of the humerus. Does dislocation of the humeral head fragment signify a worse prognosis?.  Unfallchirurg. 1997;  100 105-110
• 34 Wijgman A J, Roolker W, Patt T W, Raaymakers E L, Marti R K. Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2002;  84 1919-1925
• 35 Wilmore J H. The aging of bone and muscle.  Clin Sports Med. 1991;  10 231-244