Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1037453
Aesthetic Microtia Reconstruction with Medpor
Publication History
Publication Date:
20 February 2008 (online)
ABSTRACT
The complex architecture of the auricle makes it one of the most challenging structures for the reconstructive surgeon to re-create. Overlying the ear’s unique cartilage framework are layers of varied soft tissues forming a three-dimensional organ, which is distinctively positioned on the head. Arguably, the most challenging auricle to reconstruct is third-degree microtia due to a near-total absence of native tissue and a need for lifelong durability of the reconstruction. Many methods of reconstruction have been studied; autogenous costal cartilage reconstruction has been one of the more traditional methods, with favorable long-term results reported by several surgeons. However, this technique requires tremendous artistic and technical skill on the part of the surgeon-sculptor to construct a realistic-appearing ear. High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) is a stable, alloplastic implant that can integrate with host tissues, is resistant to infection, and has been successfully applied to reconstruction of the head and neck. For auricular reconstruction, Medpor-enveloped in a temporoparietal fascial flap with full-thickness skin graft coverage-is a durable and aesthetically gratifying alternative in microtic patients. This alternative surgical technique reduces surgical time and morbidity, standardizes results among surgeons, and facilitates an aesthetic, natural-appearing reconstruction of the auricle.
KEYWORDS
Medpor auricular framework - microtia - temporoparietal flap
REFERENCES
- 1 Pham T V, Early S V, Park S S. Surgery of the auricle. Facial Plast Surg. 2003; 19 53-74
- 2 Sclafani A P, Mashkevich G. Aesthetic reconstruction of the auricle. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006; 14 103-116
- 3 Tolleth H. A hierarchy of values in the design and construction of the ear. Clin Plast Surg. 1990; 17 193-207
- 4 Quatela V C, Thompson S K, Goldman N D. Microtia reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006; 14 117-127
- 5 Aguilar E F. Auricular reconstruction in congenital anomalies of the ear. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2001; 9 159-169
- 6 Romo III T, Presti P M, Yalamanchili H R. Medpor alternative for microtia repair. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006; 14 129-136
- 7 Jahrsdoerfer R A, Kesser B W. Issues on aural atresia for the facial plastic surgeon. Facial Plast Surg. 1995; 11 274-277
- 8 Weerda H. Classification of congenital deformities of the auricle. Facial Plast Surg. 1988; 5 385-388
- 9 Brent B. Technical advances in ear reconstruction with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: personal experience with 1200 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104 319-334
- 10 Brent B. Microtia repair with rib cartilage grafts: a review of personal experience with 1000 cases. Clin Plast Surg. 2002; 29 257-271
- 11 Tanzer R C. Microtia-a long-term follow-up of 44 reconstructed auricles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978; 61 161-166
- 12 Leach Jr J L, Jordan J A, Brown K R et al.. Techniques for improving ear definition in microtia reconstruction. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1999; 48 39-46
- 13 Avelar J. Importance of ear reconstruction for the aesthetic balance of the facial contour. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1986; 10 147-156
- 14 Furnas D W. Complications of surgery of the external ear. Clin Plast Surg. 1990; 17 305-318
- 15 Adams Jr W P, Rohrich R J, Gunter J P et al.. The rate of warping in irradiated and nonirradiated homograft rib cartilage: a controlled comparison and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 103 265-270
- 16 Thomson H G, Kim T Y, Ein S H. Residual problems in chest donor sites after microtia reconstruction: a long-term study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995; 95 961-968
- 17 Ohara K, Nakamura K, Ohta E. Chest wall deformities and thoracic scoliosis after costal cartilage graft harvesting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 99 1030-1036
- 18 Cronin T D, Ascough B M. Silastic ear construction. Clin Plast Surg. 1978; 5 367-378
- 19 Sclafani A P, Romo III T, Silver L. Clinical and histologic behavior of exposed porous high-density polyethylene implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 99 41-50
- 20 Shanbhag A, Friedman H I, Augustine J et al.. Evaluation of porous polyethylene for external ear reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1990; 24 32-39
- 21 Williams J D, Romo III T, Sclafani A P et al.. Porous high-density polyethylene implants in auricular reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997; 123 578-583
- 22 Frodel J L, Lee S. The use of high-density polyethylene implants in facial deformities. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998; 124 1219-1223
- 23 Romano J J, Iliff N T, Manson P N. Use of Medpor porous polyethylene implants in 140 patients with facial fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 1993; 4 142-147
- 24 Kim D Y, Cho K S, Lee S Y et al.. Surgical correction of cryptotia using Medpor. Ann Plast Surg. 1999; 42 693-699
- 25 Wellisz T. Reconstruction of the burned external ear using a Medpor porous polyethylene pivoting helix framework. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 91 811-818
- 26 Romo III T, Fozo M S, Sclafani A P. Microtia reconstruction using a porous polyethylene framework. Facial Plast Surg. 2000; 16 15-22
- 27 Park C, Lew D H, Yoo W H. An analysis of 123 temporoparietal fascial flaps: anatomic and clinical considerations in total auricular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104 1295-1306
- 28 Romo III T, Morris L GT, Kohan D et al.. Reconstruction of congenital microtia-atresia: outcomes with the Medpor/BAHA approach. Accepted for publication in Annals of Plastic Surgery
Thomas Romo IIIM.D.
Division of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital
135A East 74th Street, New York, NY 10021