The 19Fr Blake Drain versus the 28Fr Conventional Drain after a Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

Abstract

Background: Small silastic flexible drains (Blake drains, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA) are now widely used for drainage after thoracic surgery. Despite their increasing use, their advantages are still unclear. Methods: We examined 134 cases who underwent lobectomy and lymph node dissection for primary lung cancer and retrospectively compared the changes in the amount of postoperative drainage and wound healing at the drainage sites between 87 cases using a 19Fr Blake drain and 47 cases using a 28Fr conventional drain. Results: The amount of postoperative drainage was higher in the conventional drain group between 0 to 12 hours and became higher in the Blake drain group between 12 to 24 hours, but there were no significant differences in amounts between the two groups. There was, however, a significant difference between the two groups, with good wound healing at the drainage sites observed in all cases with the Blake drain group. Conclusion: The use of a 19Fr Blake drain instead of a 28Fr conventional drain as a means of performing drainage after a lobectomy for primary lung cancer appears to have no disadvantages.

Key words

thoracic surgery - small silastic flexible drains - Blake drains - lung lobectomy - drainage

References

• 1 Obney J A, Barnes M J, Lisagor P G. et al . A method for mediastinal drainage after cardiac procedures using small silastic drains.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;  70 1109-1110
• 2 Kejriwal N K, Newman M A. Use of a single silastic chest drain following thoracotomy: initial evaluation.  ANZ J Surg. 2005;  75 710-712
• 3 Stolz A J, Lischke R, Simonek J. et al . Comparison study on the use of tubular and spiral thoracic drains following lung resections. A prospective study.  Rozhl Chir. 2005;  84 529-532
• 4 Ishikura H, Kimura S. The use of flexible silastic drains after chest surgery: novel thoracic drainage.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;  81 331-333
• 5 Icard P, Chautard J, Zhang X. et al . A single 24F Blake drain after wedge resection or lobectomy: a study on 100 consecutive cases.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;  30 649-651
• 6 Saxena P, Kejriwal N, Newman M A. Use of Blake drains following lung resection.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;  30 952-955
• 7 Niinami H, Tabata M, Takeuchi. et al . Experimental assessment of the drainage capacity small silastic chest drains.  Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2006;  14 223-226
• 8 Clark G, Licker M, Bertin D. et al . Small size new silastic drains: life-threatening hypovolemic shock after thoracic surgery associated with a non-functioning chest tube.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;  31 566-568
• 9 Frankel T L, Hill P C, Stamou S C. et al . Silastic drains vs. conventional chest tubes after coronary artery bypass.  Chest. 2003;  124 108-113
• 10 Roberts N, Boehm M, Bates M. et al . Two-center prospective randomized controlled trial of Blake versus Portex drains after cardiac surgery.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;  132 1042-1046
• 11 Bjesssmo S, Hylander S, Vedin J. et al . Comparison of three different chest drainages after coronary artery bypass surgery. A randomised trial in 150 patients.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;  31 372-375
• 12 Ehrenkranz N J, Meakins J L. Surgical infections. Bennett JV, Brachman PS Hospital infectons. Boston; Little, Brown and Co. 1992: 685-710