Rates of venous thromboembolism occurrence in medical patients among the insured population

Summary

The burden of venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains high in the United States (US). This study assesses the rate of VTE prophylaxis in a large real-world population of medically ill patients and identifies factors which confer VTE risk to this population. Discharges from the PharMetrics database were included if they were aged ≥40 years and had a hospitalisation claim (Jan 2001-Dec 2005) for cancer, congestive heart failure (CHF), severe infectious disease (SID), or lung disease. Discharges with incomplete records in the prior year to the index hospitalisation claim date were excluded. VTE rate, type (deep venous thrombosis [DVT] or pulmonary embolism [PE]), and time to VTE were compared between groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of VTE occurrence. A total of 158,325 patients were included in the study. Cancer patients had the highest incidence of VTE (7.6%), with the average for all patients being 5.6% (1.5% PE).VTE occurred most frequently post discharge, with the median time being 74 days. Post-discharge prophylaxis was provided to 13.1% of CHF patients and < 5% of all other patients. Independent predictors of VTE included a pre-index VTE (odds ratio [OR] 9.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.28–9.91) and a primary diagnosis of cancer compared with a diagnosis of SID (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.24–1.46). In conclusion, commercially insured medical patients in the US are at high risk of VTE following hospital discharge. One-quarter of medical patients who developed a VTE are at high risk of developing the more severe form of the disease, namely PE, with independent predictors of VTE in the postdischarge period including previous VTE and cancer.

Keywords

Venous thrombosis - prevention - epidemiological studies

• References

• 1 Spyropoulos AC, Hurley JS, Cisela GN. et al. Management of acute proximal deep vein thrombosis: Pharmacoeconomic evaulation of outpatient treatment with enoxaparin vs inpatient treatment with unfractionated heparin. Chest 2002; 122: 108-114.
• 2 Spyropoulos AC, Lin J. Direct medical costs of venous thromboembolism and subsequent hospital readmission rates: an administrative claims analysis from 30 managed care organizations. J Manag Care Pharm 2007; 13: 475-486.
• 3 MacDougall DA, Feliu AL, Boccuzzi SJ. et al. Economic burden of deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and post-thrombotic syndrome. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006; 63 (20) (Suppl. 06) S5-15.
• 4 Prandoni P, Noventa F, Ghirarduzzi A. et al. The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuing anticoagulation in patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. A prospective cohort study in 1,626 patients. Haematologica 2007; 92: 199-205.
• 5 Spencer FA, Lessard D, Emery C. et al. Venous thromboembolism in the outpatient setting. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 1471-1475.
• 6 Amin A, Stemkowski S, Lin J. et al. Thromboprophylaxis rates in US medical centers: success or failure?. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 05: 1610-1616.
• 7 Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA. et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126 (Suppl. 03) 338S-400S.
• 8 Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF. et al. American College of Chest Physicians. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Ed.). Chest 2008; 133 (Suppl. 06) 381S-453S.
• 9 Samama MM. An epidemiologic study of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis in medical outpatients: the Sirius study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 3415-3420.
• 10 Alikhan R, Cohen AT, Combe S. et al. MEDENOX Study. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with acute medical illness: analysis of the MEDENOX Study. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 963-968.
• 11 Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN. et al. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 809-815.
• 12 Edelsberg J, Hagiwara M, Taneja C. et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized medically ill patients. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006; 63 (20) (Suppl. 06) S16-22.
• 13 Department of Health and Human Services Policy for Protection of Human Research Subjects. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.101 11–17–2005. 1–12–2006.
• 14 Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL. et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373-383.
• 15 Samama MM, Cohen AT, Darmon JY. et al. A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 793-800.
• 16 Leizorovicz A, Cohen AT, Turpie AG. et al. PREVENT Medical Thromboprophylaxis Study Group. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of dalteparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Circulation 2004; 110: 874-879.
• 17 Cohen AT, Davidson BL, Gallus AS. et al. sARTEMIS Investigators. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in older acute medical patients: randomised placebo controlled trial. Br Med J 2006; 332: 325-329.
• 18 Piazza G, Seddighzadeh A, Goldhaber SZ. Double trouble for 2,609 hospitalized medical patients who developed deep vein thrombosis: prophylaxis omitted more often and pulmonary embolism more frequent. Chest 2007; 132: 554-561.
• 19 Hull RD, Schellong SM, Tapson VF. et al. Late breaking clinical trial: Extended-duration venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patienrs with recent reduced mobility: The EXCLAIM Study. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 05 (Suppl. 02) O-S-001.