Thromb Haemost 2011; 105(05): 811-819
DOI: 10.1160/TH10-08-0525
Theme Issue Article
Schattauer GmbH

Simultaneous intravital imaging of macrophage and neutrophil behaviour during inflammation using a novel transgenic zebrafish

Caroline Gray
1   MRC Centre for Developmental and Biomedical Genetics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
2   Department of Cardiovascular Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
,
Catherine A. Loynes
1   MRC Centre for Developmental and Biomedical Genetics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
4   Department of Infection and Immunity, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
,
Moira K. B. Whyte
1   MRC Centre for Developmental and Biomedical Genetics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
4   Department of Infection and Immunity, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
,
David C. Crossman
1   MRC Centre for Developmental and Biomedical Genetics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
2   Department of Cardiovascular Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
3   NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
,
Stephen A. Renshaw*
1   MRC Centre for Developmental and Biomedical Genetics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
4   Department of Infection and Immunity, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
,
Timothy J. A. Chico*
1   MRC Centre for Developmental and Biomedical Genetics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
2   Department of Cardiovascular Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
3   NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
› Author Affiliations
Financial support: This work was funded by a BHF project grant (PG06/052) & a GSK Clinician Scientist Fellowship awarded to TC, and a MRC Senior Clinical Fellowship (G0701932) awarded to SAR. Microscopy were supported by a Wellcome Trust grant to the MBB/ BMS Light Microscopy Facility (GR077544AIA), and the work was supported by a MRC Centre grant (G0700091).
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 12 August 2010

Accepted after minor revision: 08 January 2010

Publication Date:
28 November 2017 (online)

Summary

The zebrafish is an outstanding model for intravital imaging of inflammation due to its optical clarity and the ability to express fluorescently labelled specific cell types by transgenesis. However, although several transgenic labelling myeloid cells exist, none allow distinction of macrophages from neutrophils. This prevents simultaneous imaging and examination of the individual contributions of these important leukocyte subtypes during inflammation. We therefore used Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BAC) recombineering to generate a transgenic Tg(fms:GAL4.VP16)i186, in which expression of the hybrid transcription factor Gal4-VP16 is driven by the fms (CSF1R) promoter. This was then crossed to a second transgenic expressing a mCherry-nitroreductase fusion protein under the control of the Gal4 binding site (the UAS promoter), allowing intravital imaging of mCherry-labelled macrophages. Further crossing this compound transgenic with the neutrophil transgenic Tg(mpx:GFP)i114 allowed clear distinction between macrophages and neutrophils and simultaneous imaging of their recruitment and behaviour during inflammation. Compared with neutrophils, macrophages migrate significantly more slowly to an inflammatory stimulus. Neutrophil number at a site of tissue injury peaked around 6 hours post injury before resolving, while macrophage recruitment increased until at least 48 hours. We show that macrophages were effectively ablated by addition of the prodrug metronidazole, with no effect on neutrophil number. Crossing with Tg(Fli1:GFP)y1 transgenic fish enabled intravital imaging of macrophage interaction with endothelium for the first time, revealing that endothelial contact is associated with faster macrophage migration. Tg(fms:GAL4.VP16)i186 thus provides a powerful tool for intravital imaging and functional manipulation of macrophage behaviour during inflammation.

* Joint senior authorship.


 
  • References

  • 1 Soehnlein O, Lindbom L. Phagocyte partnership during the onset and resolution of inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 2010; 10: 427-439.
  • 2 Soehnlein O, Weber C. Myeloid cells in atherosclerosis: initiators and decision shapers. Semin Immunopathol 2009; 31: 35-47.
  • 3 Hansson GK. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1685-1695.
  • 4 Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature 2002; 420: 868-874.
  • 5 Weber C, Schober A, Zernecke A. Chemokines: key regulators of mononuclear cell recruitment in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004; 24: 1997-2008.
  • 6 Renshaw SA, Loynes CA, Trushell DM. et al. A transgenic zebrafish model of neutrophilic inflammation. Blood 2006; 108: 3976-3978.
  • 7 Niethammer P, Grabher C, Look AT. et al. A tissue-scale gradient of hydrogen per-oxide mediates rapid wound detection in zebrafish. Nature 2009; 459: 996-999.
  • 8 Hall C, Flores MV, Chien A. et al. Transgenic zebrafish reporter lines reveal conserved Toll-like receptor signaling potential in embryonic myeloid leukocytes and adult immune cell lineages. J Leukoc Biol 2009; 85: 751-765.
  • 9 Cvejic A, Hall C, Bak-Maier M. et al. Analysis of WASp function during the wound inflammatory response--live-imaging studies in zebrafish larvae. J Cell Sci 2008; 121: 3196-3206.
  • 10 Le Guyader D, Redd MJ, Colucci-Guyon E. et al. Origins and unconventional behavior of neutrophils in developing zebrafish. Blood 2008; 111: 132-141.
  • 11 Chico TJ, Ingham PW, Crossman DC. Modeling cardiovascular disease in the zebrafish. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2008; 18: 150-155.
  • 12 Lieschke GJ, Currie PD. Animal models of human disease: zebrafish swim into view. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8: 353-367.
  • 13 Gray C, Packham IM, Wurmser F. et al. Ischemia is not required for arteriogenesis in zebrafish embryos. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007; 27: 2135-2141.
  • 14 Kelenyi G, Larsen LO. The haematopoietic supraneural organ of adult, sexually immature river lampreys (Lampetra fluviatilis [L.] Gray) with particular reference to azurophil leucocytes. Acta Biol Acad Sci Hung 1976; 27: 45-56.
  • 15 Ellett F, Lieschke GJ. Zebrafish as a model for vertebrate hematopoiesis. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2010 prepub online.
  • 16 Herbomel P, Thisse B, Thisse C. Ontogeny and behaviour of early macrophages in the zebrafish embryo. Development 1999; 126: 3735-3745.
  • 17 Naito M. Macrophage differentiation and function in health and disease. Pathol Int 2008; 58: 143-155.
  • 18 Hsu K, Traver D, Kutok JL. et al. The pu.1 promoter drives myeloid gene expression in zebrafish. Blood 2004; 104: 1291-1297.
  • 19 Peri F, Nusslein-Volhard C. Live imaging of neuronal degradation by microglia reveals a role for v0-ATPase a1 in phagosomal fusion in vivo. Cell 2008; 133: 916-927.
  • 20 Ward AC, McPhee DO, Condron MM. et al. The zebrafish spi1 promoter drives myeloid-specific expression in stable transgenic fish. Blood 2003; 102: 3238-3240.
  • 21 Mathias JR, Perrin BJ, Liu TX. et al. Resolution of inflammation by retrograde chemotaxis of neutrophils in transgenic zebrafish. J Leukoc Biol 2006; 80: 1281-1288.
  • 22 Meijer AH, van der Sar AM, Cunha C. et al. Identification and real-time imaging of a myc-expressing neutrophil population involved in inflammation and mycobacterial granuloma formation in zebrafish. Dev Comp Immunol 2008; 32: 36-49.
  • 23 Hall C, Flores MV, Storm T. et al. The zebrafish lysozyme C promoter drives myeloid-specific expression in transgenic fish. BMC Dev Biol 2007; 7: 42.
  • 24 Redd MJ, Kelly G, Dunn G. et al. Imaging macrophage chemotaxis in vivo: studies of microtubule function in zebrafish wound inflammation. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2006; 63: 415-422.
  • 25 Lawson ND, Weinstein BM. In vivo imaging of embryonic vascular development using transgenic zebrafish. Dev Biol 2002; 248: 307-318.
  • 26 Burnett SH, Kershen EJ, Zhang J. et al. Conditional macrophage ablation in transgenic mice expressing a Fas-based suicide gene. J Leukoc Biol 2004; 75: 612-623.
  • 27 Sasmono RT, Oceandy D, Pollard JW. et al. A macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor-green fluorescent protein transgene is expressed throughout the mononuclear phagocyte system of the mouse. Blood 2003; 101: 1155-1163.
  • 28 Crowhurst MO, Layton JE, Lieschke GJ. Developmental biology of zebrafish myeloid cells. Int J Dev Biol 2002; 46: 483-492.
  • 29 Suster ML, Kikuta H, Urasaki A. et al. Transgenesis in zebrafish with the tol2 transposon system. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 561: 41-63.
  • 30 Villefranc JA, Amigo J, Lawson ND. Gateway compatible vectors for analysis of gene function in the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 2007; 236: 3077-3087.
  • 31 Halpern ME, Rhee J, Goll MG. et al. Gal4/UAS transgenic tools and their application to zebrafish. Zebrafish 2008; 5: 97-110.
  • 32 Mullins M. Genetic methods: conventions for naming zebrafish genes. In: Wester-field M. editor. The Zebrafish Book. 3rd ed. University of Oregon Press; 1995. pp. 7.1-7.4.
  • 33 Lee EC, Yu D, Martinez de Velasco J. et al. A highly efficient Escherichia coli-based chromosome engineering system adapted for recombinogenic targeting and sub-cloning of BAC DNA. Genomics 2001; 73: 56-65.
  • 34 McLeish JA, Chico TJ, Taylor HB. et al. Skin exposure to micro- and nano-particles can cause haemostasis in zebrafish larvae. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 797-807.
  • 35 Pisharath H, Parsons MJ. Nitroreductase-mediated cell ablation in transgenic zebrafish embryos. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 546: 133-143.
  • 36 Prajsnar TK, Cunliffe VT, Foster SJ. et al. A novel vertebrate model of Staphylococcus aureus infection reveals phagocyte-dependent resistance of zebrafish to non-host specialized pathogens. Cell Microbiol 2008; 10: 2312-2325.
  • 37 Loynes CA, Martin JS, Robertson A. et al. Pivotal Advance: Pharmacological manipulation of inflammation resolution during spontaneously resolving tissue neutrophilia in the zebrafish. J Leukoc Biol 2010; 87: 203-212.
  • 38 Alstergren P, Zhu B, Glogauer M. et al. Polarization and directed migration of murine neutrophils is dependent on cell surface expression of CD44. Cell Immunol 2004; 231: 146-157.
  • 39 Gong Y, Hart E, Shchurin A. et al. Inflammatory macrophage migration requires MMP-9 activation by plasminogen in mice. J Clin Invest 2008; 118: 3012-3024.
  • 40 Fantin A, Vieira JM, Gestri G. et al. Tissue macrophages act as cellular chaperones for vascular anastomosis downstream of VEGF-mediated endothelial tip cell induction. Blood 2010; 116: 829-840.
  • 41 Zakrzewska A, Cui C, Stockhammer OW. et al. Macrophage-specific gene functions in Spi1-directed innate immunity. Blood 2010; 116: e1-11.
  • 42 Thisse B, Wright GJ, Thisse C. Embryonic and Larval Expression Patterns from a Large Scale Screening for Novel Low Affinity Extracellular Protein Interactions. ZFIN Direct Data Submission (http://zfinorg) 2008.
  • 43 Auffray C, Fogg D, Garfa M. et al. Monitoring of blood vessels and tissues by a population of monocytes with patrolling behavior. Science 2007; 317: 666-670.
  • 44 Murdoch C, Muthana M, Coffelt SB. et al. The role of myeloid cells in the promotion of tumour angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 2008; 8: 618-631.
  • 45 Kwan KM, Fujimoto E, Grabher C. et al. The Tol2kit: a multisite gateway-based construction kit for Tol2 transposon transgenesis constructs. Dev Dyn 2007; 236: 3088-3099.
  • 46 Goll MG, Anderson R, Stainier DY. et al. Transcriptional silencing and reactivation in transgenic zebrafish. Genetics 2009; 182: 747-755.