Management and adherence to VTE treatment guidelines in a national prospective cohort study in the Canadian outpatient setting

Summary

Documenting patterns and outcomes of venous thromboembolism (VTE) management and degree of adherence by clinicians to treatment guidelines could help identify remediable gaps in patient care. Prospective, clinical practice-based data from Canadian outpatient settings on management of VTE, degree of adherence with treatment guidelines and frequency of recurrent VTE and bleeding during follow-up was obtained in a multicentre, prospective observational study. From 12 Canadian centres, we assessed 868 outpatients with acute symptomatic VTE who received the low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin alone or with vitamin K antagonists (VKA), at baseline and at six months (or at the end of treatment, whichever came first). Index VTE was limb deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in 583 (67.2%) patients, pulmonary embolism (PE) with or without DVT in 262 (30.2%) patients, and unusual site DVT in 23 (2.6%) patients. VTE was unprovoked in 399 (46.0%) patients, associated with cancer in 74 (8.5%) patients, transient risk factors in 327 (37.7%) patients and hormonal factors in 68 (7.8%) patients. With regard to guideline adherence, 58 (7.3%) patients received <5 days LMWH and 114 (14.5%) had overlap <1 day. Among patients with cancer-related VTE, 59.5% were prescribed LMWH monotherapy and 43.2% received such treatment for >3 months. Only 38.1% of patients with transient VTE risk factors had received thromboprophylaxis. Our study provides useful information on clinical presentation, management and related outcomes in Canadian outpatients with VTE. Our results suggest there may be important gaps in use of thromboprophylaxis to prevent VTE and use of LMWH mono-therapy to treat cancer-related VTE.

Note: Part of this study was presented as an Oral Abstract Presentation at the American Society of Hematology meeting, Dec. 4–7, 2010, Orlando, FL, USA.

Keywords

Venous thromboembolism - clinical practice guidelines - anticoagulation - cancer-associated thrombosis - prospective study

• References

• 1 White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107: I4-8.
• 2 Scarvelis D, Wells PS. Diagnosis and treatment of deep-vein thrombosis. CMAJ 2006; 175: 1087-1092.
• 3 Kearon C, Kahn SR, Agnelli G. et al. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133: 454S-545S.
• 4 Koopman MM, Prandoni P, Piovella F. et al. Treatm ent of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. The Tasman Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 682-687.
• 5 Geer ts W H, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF. et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133: 381S-453S.
• 6 Cook LM, Kahn SR, Goodwin J. et al. Frequency of renal impairment, advanced age, obesity and cancer in venous thromboembolism patients in clinical practice. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 05: 937-941.
• 7 Buller HR, Agnelli G, Hull RD. et al. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126: 401S-28S.
• 8 Spirk D, Banyai M, Jacomella V. et al. Outpatient management of acute deep vein thrombosis: results from the OTIS-DVT reg istry. Thromb Res 2011; 127: 406-410.
• 9 Kahn SR, Panju A, Geerts W. et al. Multicenter evaluation of the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients in Canada. Thromb Res 2007; 119: 145-155.
• 10 Monreal M, Kakkar AK, Caprini JA. et al. The outcome after treatment of venous thromboembolism is different in surgical and acutely ill medical patients. Findings from the RIETE registry. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 02: 1892-1898.
• 11 Piccioli A, Prandoni P, Goldhaber SZ. Epidemiologic characteristics, management, and outcome of deep venous thrombosis in a tertiary-care hospital: the Brigham and Women's Hospital DVT registry. Am Heart J 1996; 132: 1010-1014.
• 12 Arcelus JI, Caprini JA, Monreal M. et al. The management and outcome of acute venous thromboembolism: a prospective registry including 4011 patients. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 916-922.
• 13 Samama MM, Gerotziafas GT. Comparative pharmacokinetics of LMWHs. Semin Thromb Hemost 2000; 26: 31-38.
• 14 Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ. et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141: e419S-94S.
• 15 Qaseem A, Chou R, Humphrey LL. et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized patients: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 625-632.