Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere 2016; 44(02): 94-104
DOI: 10.15654/TPK-150290
Originalartikel
Schattauer GmbH

The effect of endoscopic sterilization on reproductive behavior and pair bond maintenance of feral pigeons (Columba livia)

Article in several languages: deutsch | English
E. Heiderich
1   Tierpark Bern, Bern, Schweiz
2   Klinik für Vögel, Reptilien, Amphibien und Fische, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
,
K. Failing
3   Institut für Biomathematik, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
,
M. Lierz
2   Klinik für Vögel, Reptilien, Amphibien und Fische, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
,
B. Schildger
1   Tierpark Bern, Bern, Schweiz
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 28 April 2015

Accepted after major revision: 20 March 2015

Publication Date:
20 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Objective: Problems related to feral pigeons (Columba livia) in cities mainly result from their large numbers due to uncontrolled population growth. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether endoscopic guided sterilization affects the reproductive behavior of feral pigeons under experimental conditions, with the intention of assessing this technique as a potential method for feral pigeon population control. Materials and methods: Five groups of four pairs of feral pigeons each were studied from 8 weeks before, to 7 weeks after sterilization. Both the male and female of the first pair of each group were steri lized, in the second pair only the female and in the third pair only the male was sterilized. The fourth pair acted as a control. All eggs laid were candled to assess fertility. Results: Surgical sterilization had minimal effects on behavior and therefore seems not to have impact on possible field application for population control. All pairs maintained their pair bonds and continued to defend their nesting sites against other pigeons. Only one female copulated with a foreign fertile male while her primary partner was debilitated due to surgery, but returned to him as soon as he recovered. All eggs laid more than 5 days after male sterilization were infertile, whereas all control pairs had fertile eggs. Only one fertile clutch was produced, 5 days after the male’s sterilization. Therefore it is assumed that males remain fertile for a limited period of time. Conclusion: Endoscopic sterilization seems to be a promising method for field control of feral pigeon populations and sterilization of the male only seems sufficient.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Birkhead TR, Pellatt JE. Vasectomy in small passerine birds. Vet Rec 1989; 125: 646.
  • 2 Bray OE, Kennelly JJ, Guarino JL. Fertility of eggs produced on territorities of vasectomized red-winged blackbirds. Wilson Bull 1975; 87 (02) 187-195.
  • 3 Briskie JV. Copulation patterns and sperm competition in the polygynandrous Smith’s Longspur. Auk 1992; 109 (02) 563-575.
  • 4 Carpenter CR. Psychobiological studies of social behavior in Aves. I. The effect of complete and incomplete gonadectomy on the primary sexual activity of the male pigeon. J Comp Psychol 1933; 16 (01) 25-57.
  • 5 Cheng M-F, Silver R. Estrogen-progesterone regulation of nest-building and incubation behavior in ovariectomized ring doves (Streptopelia risoria). J Comp Physiol Psychol 1975; 88 (01) 256-263.
  • 6 Converse KA, Kennelly JJ. Evaluation of Canada goose sterilization for population control. Wildlife Soc B 1994; 22 (02) 265-269.
  • 7 Dixon WJ. BMDP Statistical Software Manual.. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press; 1993
  • 8 Dobeic M. Regulation of population size of street pigeons in Ljubljana, Slovenia. Acta Vet-Beograd 2003; 53 (23) 171-182.
  • 9 Dobeic M, Pintarič Š, Vlahović K, Dovč A. Feral pigeon (Columba livia) population management in Ljubljana. Vet Arhiv 2011; 81 (02) 285-298.
  • 10 Fabricius E, Jansson A-M. Laboratory observations on the reproductive behaviour of the pigeon (Columba livia) during the pre-incubation phase of the breeding cycle. Anim Behav 1963; 11 (04) 534-547.
  • 11 Giunchi D, Albores-Barajas YV, Baldaccini NE, Vanni L, Soldatini C. Feral pigeons: problems, dynamics and control methods. Integrated pest management and pest control - current and future tactics.. Larramendy ML, Soloneski S. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2012: 215-240.
  • 12 Goodwin D. The significance of some behaviour patterns of pigeons. Bird Study 1956; 3 (01) 25-37.
  • 13 Haag-Wackernagel D. Die Straßentaube: Die Geschichte einer Mensch-Tier-Beziehung. Schweizer Tierschutz, Du + die Natur 1994; 3 (121) 4-30.
  • 14 Haag-Wackernagel D. Zur Ethologie der Taube (Columba livia). Tierärztl Prax 1994; 22 (04) 358-363.
  • 15 Haag-Wackernagel D. Regulation of the street pigeon in Basel. Wildlife Soc B 1995; 23 (02) 256-260.
  • 16 Haag-Wackernagel D. Die soziokulturellen Ursachen des Taubenproblems. Dtsch Tierärztl Wochenschr 1997; 2: 52-57.
  • 17 Haag-Wackernagel D. Feral pigeons: management experiences in Europe. Atti 2 Convegno Nazionale sulla Fauna Urbana: Specieonitiche probematiche: Biologia e gestione nelle cittá e nel territorio. 10. Juni 2000. Firenze, Italia: ARSIA e LIPU;
  • 18 Haag-Wackernagel D. Die Taube - eine Erfolgsgeschichte. Vom Liebling der Götter zur Eroberung der Städte. Biologie in unserer Zeit 2011; 41 (01) 44-52.
  • 19 Haag D. Ethogramm der Taube.. Abs M, Galhoff H. Ruhr-Universität Bochum; 1991
  • 20 Heiderich E, Schildger B, Lierz M. Endoscopic vasectomy of male feral pigeons (Columba livia) as a possible method of population control. J Avian Med Surg 2015; 29 (01) 9-17.
  • 21 Heinroth O, Heinroth K. Verhaltensweisen der Felsentaube (Haustaube). Z Tierpsychol 1949; 6 (02) 153-201.
  • 22 Hundgen K, Raphael B, Sheppard C. Egg fertility among vasectomized and non-vasectomized male resident Canada geese at the Wildlife Conservation Park/Bronx Zoo. Zoo Biol 2000; 19 (01) 35-40.
  • 23 Ihle M, Kempanaers B, Forstmeier W. Does hatching failure breed infidelity?. Behav Ecol 2013; 24 (01) 119-127.
  • 24 Jones R, Redig PT. Endoscopy guided vasectomy in the immature japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). 7th Conference of the European Association of Avian Veterinarians, 5th Scientific Meeting of the European College of Avian Medicine and Surgery. 22-26 April 2003. Tenerife, Spain:
  • 25 Kennelly JJ, Converse KA. Surgical sterilization: an underutilized procedure for evaluating the merits of induced sterility. Contraception in Wildlife Management. Denver, Colorado: 1993
  • 26 Kennelly JJ, Johns BE, Garrison MV. Influence of sterile males on fecundity of a rat colony. J Wildlife Manage 1972; 36 (01) 161-165.
  • 27 Lack D. Courtship feeding in birds. Auk 1940; 57 (02) 169-179.
  • 28 Lierz M. Endoscopy, biopsy and endosurgery. BSAVA Manual of raptors, pigeons and passerine birds.. Chitty J, Lierz M. Gloucester: British Small Animal Veterinary Association; 2008: 128-142.
  • 29 Lierz M, Hafez HM. Endoskopische Chirurgie beim Vogel - Sterilisation und Kastration. 14. Tagung über Vogelkrankheiten, 4.-6. März 2004; München: Deutsche Veterinärmedizinische Gesellschaft e. V. Fachgruppe „Geflügelkrankheiten (WVPA)“ und Institut für Geflügelkrankheiten LMU München.
  • 30 Lierz M, Hafez HM. Endoscopic guided multiple entry surgery in birds. 8th European AAV Conference, 6th Scientific ECAMS Meeting. 24.-30. April 2005. Arles, France: Association Francaise des Vétérinaires pour Animaux de Compagnie, Groupe d’Etude des Nouveaux Animaux de Compagnie;
  • 31 Martin P, Bateson PPG. Measuring Behaviour. An Introductory Guide. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007
  • 32 Rösener A. Die Stadttaubenproblematik: Ursachen, Entwicklungen, Lösungen. Eine Literaturübersicht.. Aachen: Shaker; 1999
  • 33 Samour JH, Markham JA. Vasectomy in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Vet Rec 1987; 120 (05) 115.
  • 34 Simms E. The public life of the street pigeon.. London: Hutchinson; 1979
  • 35 Vogel C. Tauben. München: DLV - Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag. 1997
  • 36 Whitman CO, Carr HA. The behavior of pigeons.. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington; 1919
  • 37 Wosegien A. Experiments on pair bond stability of domestic pigeons (Columba livia domestica). Behaviour 1997; 134 (03) 275-297.