RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X20160090
Safety of switching from natalizumab straight into fingolimod in a group of JCV-positive patients with multiple sclerosis
Segurança na mudança direta de natalizumabe para fingolimode em um grupo de pacientes com esclerose múltipla e positivos para JCVABSTRACT
Objective To assess safety of the switch between natalizumab and fingolimod without a washout period.
Methods Prospective data on 25 JCV positive patients who underwent this medication switch were collected and analyzed.
Results After a median period of nine months from the medication switch, there were no safety issues to report. The patients had good disease control and no adverse events were reported.
Conclusion Washout may not be necessary in daily practice when switching from natalizumab to fingolimod. Expertise on multiple sclerosis management, however, is essential for drug switching.
#
RESUMO
Objetivo Avaliar a segurança na mudança entre natalizumabe e fingolimode sem período de washout.
Métodos Dados prospectivos de 25 pacientes positivos para vírus JC que tiveram sua medicação modificada foram coletados e analisados.
Resultados Após uma mediana de nove meses da troca de medicação, não havia aspectos de segurança a relatar. Os pacientes estavam com bom controle da doença e não foram relatados eventos adversos.
Conclusão Washout pode não ser necessário na prática diária para a mudança entre natalizumabe e fingolimode. No entanto, expertise no manejo de esclerose múltipla é essencial para esta troca entre medicações.
#
Natalizumab and fingolimod are both efficient and safe treatments when used at the appropriate time in multiple sclerosis (MS). Peculiarities regarding the safety aspects of these drugs make it ideal for them to be administered by physicians who are familiar with the potential adverse events and know how to avoid them. Natalizumab is an efficient drug for treating MS. This monoclonal antibody is used in the form of monthly infusions and has remarkable effects on the activity of the disease, such that it maintaining MS under control in a large majority of patients[1]. The major concern when using natalizumab for longer periods is the potential for development fatal progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in association with JCV+ status. Because of the risk of developing PML or due to suboptimal response to this treatment, some patients are withdrawn from natalizumab after a period of using it[2]. When natalizumab is withdrawn, there is a serious risk of severe disease reactivation[3] and there are no specific protocols to follow in this situation[4]. Fingolimod is considered to be the best alternative for patients who are ceasing to use natalizumab[5], but the washout period between the two drugs is still a matter of controversy. It is considered that patients who switch from natalizumab to another drug continue to run the risk of PML during the overlap period between the two drugs, since natalizumab takes 56 days[6] to 200 days[6] to be cleared out of the patient’s serum. Because of this overlap, caution has been recommended by panels of experts, particularly when the patient is JCV+[7]. After the initial recommendations for a six-month washout period, other proposals emerged and there is now no doubt that the shorter the washout period is, the less the chance of disease reactivation will be[7],[8]. In fact, shorter periods seem to have an even better effect on disease control without compromising safety[9]. At present, the recommendations are that there should be 8 to 12 weeks of washout between these drugs, and the rate of reactivation is still high in the literature. The aim of the present study is to provide data on 25 JCV+ patients who had four to eight weeks of washout period, without any drug given during this time.
METHODS
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, Brazil, under the Certification of Ethical Presentation and Approval (CAAE) no. 05669912.3.0000.5509. Data were collected prospectively from patients who ceased using natalizumab and started treatment with fingolimod, at all of the nine MS units participating in this project. The period between the drugs was four to eight weeks (from the time of the last infusion of natalizumab to the time of administration of the first capsule of fingolimod). No cases were lost to follow-up. This was an observational and open study, and every participating neurologist took his/her own decision on how long the washout should be (between four and eight weeks), considering that there were no specific guidelines to follow. Sample size was calculated as 23 patients aiming for 95% confidence and 5% error.
#
RESULTS
Twenty-five patients entered the study. There were 20 females and 5 male subjects, with a median age of 40 years. All the patients were JCV+. The median duration of treatment with natalizumab had been 29 months (range: 10 to 55 months) at the time of the drug switch. For 15 patients, the first dose of fingolimod was administered at the time of completing four weeks since the last infusion of natalizumab. The median duration of treatment with fingolimod was 13 months at the time when the data were collected (range: nine to 26 weeks).
The average time that elapsed between treatments was 5.6 ± 2.0 weeks (median = four weeks). One patient had previously had tuberculosis and required maintenance of isoniazid treatment throughout natalizumab and fingolimod administration. One patient suffered a fall followed by seizures, but no evidence of PML was observed. This patient later evolved to secondary progressive MS and is, at present, without immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatment. No other noteworthy adverse events or specific features were observed.
All patients showed complete control of the disease without relapses, and without lesion enlargement or new lesions on MRI. Disability, as assessed by the expanded disability scale score (EDSS)[10], was unaltered after the drug switch (average EDSS = 3.6 before the switch and 3.5 at the last consultation).
#
DISCUSSION
Natalizumab is an excellent choice for treating highly active MS, but it may be necessary to withdraw this treatment at a given point. Fingolimod is the best choice for the drug switch[8]. Expert recommendations that are not evidence-based state that there must be a washout period of three to six months before fingolimod is started. The recurrence of disease activity among such patients undergoing long follow-up periods has been very high[9].
In conclusion, in order to control disease activity, a maximum interval of eight weeks between the two treatments seems to be a safe and efficient way of dealing with natalizumab withdrawal.
#
#
Conflict of interest:
There is no conflict of interest to declare.
-
References
- 1 Derfuss T, Kuhle J, Lindberg R, Kappos L. Natalizumab therapy for multiple sclerosis. Semin Neurol. 2013;33(1):26-36. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1343793
- 2 Tur C, Montalban X. Natalizumab: risk stratification of individual patients with multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2014;28(7):641-8. doi:10.1007/s40263-014-0168-0
- 3 Baumgartner A, Stich O, Rauer S. Clinical and radiological disease reactivation after cessation of long-term therapy with natalizumab. Int J Neurosci. 2012;122(1):35-9. doi:10.3109/00207454.2011.622452
- 4 Capobianco M, di Sapio A, Malentacchi M, Malucchi S, Matta M, Sperli F et al. No impact of current therapeutic strategies on disease reactivation after natalizumab discontinuation: a comparative analysis of different approaches during the first year of natalizumab discontinuation. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(3):585-7. doi:10.1111/ene.12487
- 5 Stüve O, Cravens PD, Frohman EM, Phillips JT, Remington GM, Geldern G et al. Immunologic, clinical, and radiologic status 14 months after cessation of natalizumab therapy. Neurology. 2009;72(5):396-401. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000327341.89587.76
- 6 Rispens T, Vennegoor A, Wolbink GJ, Polman CH, Killestein J. Natalizumab remains detectable in patients with multiple sclerosis long after treatment is stopped. Mult Scler. 2012;18(6):899-901. doi:10.1177/1352458511431073
- 7 Kappos L, Radue EW, Comi G, Montalban X, Butzkueven H, Wiendl H et al. Switching from natalizumab to fingolimod: A randomized, placebo-controlled study in RRMS. Neurology. 2015;85(1):29-39. doi:10.1212/WNL.20160090201600901706
- 8 Iaffaldano P, Lucisano G, Pozzilli C, Brescia Morra V, Ghezzi A, Millefiorini E et al. Fingolimod versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate after natalizumab suspension in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2015;138(11)3275-86. doi:10.1093/brain/awv260
- 9 Fragoso YD, Adoni T, Alves-Leon S, Apostolo-Pereira SL, Araujo YR, Becker J et al. Alternatives for reducing relapse rate when switching from natalizumab to fingolimod in multiple sclerosis. Exp Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2016;9(4). doi:10.1586/17512433.2016.1145053
- 10 Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33(11):1444-52. doi:10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444
Address for correspondence
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 13. Januar 2016
Angenommen: 24. Mai 2016
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. September 2023
© 2023. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Derfuss T, Kuhle J, Lindberg R, Kappos L. Natalizumab therapy for multiple sclerosis. Semin Neurol. 2013;33(1):26-36. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1343793
- 2 Tur C, Montalban X. Natalizumab: risk stratification of individual patients with multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2014;28(7):641-8. doi:10.1007/s40263-014-0168-0
- 3 Baumgartner A, Stich O, Rauer S. Clinical and radiological disease reactivation after cessation of long-term therapy with natalizumab. Int J Neurosci. 2012;122(1):35-9. doi:10.3109/00207454.2011.622452
- 4 Capobianco M, di Sapio A, Malentacchi M, Malucchi S, Matta M, Sperli F et al. No impact of current therapeutic strategies on disease reactivation after natalizumab discontinuation: a comparative analysis of different approaches during the first year of natalizumab discontinuation. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(3):585-7. doi:10.1111/ene.12487
- 5 Stüve O, Cravens PD, Frohman EM, Phillips JT, Remington GM, Geldern G et al. Immunologic, clinical, and radiologic status 14 months after cessation of natalizumab therapy. Neurology. 2009;72(5):396-401. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000327341.89587.76
- 6 Rispens T, Vennegoor A, Wolbink GJ, Polman CH, Killestein J. Natalizumab remains detectable in patients with multiple sclerosis long after treatment is stopped. Mult Scler. 2012;18(6):899-901. doi:10.1177/1352458511431073
- 7 Kappos L, Radue EW, Comi G, Montalban X, Butzkueven H, Wiendl H et al. Switching from natalizumab to fingolimod: A randomized, placebo-controlled study in RRMS. Neurology. 2015;85(1):29-39. doi:10.1212/WNL.20160090201600901706
- 8 Iaffaldano P, Lucisano G, Pozzilli C, Brescia Morra V, Ghezzi A, Millefiorini E et al. Fingolimod versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate after natalizumab suspension in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2015;138(11)3275-86. doi:10.1093/brain/awv260
- 9 Fragoso YD, Adoni T, Alves-Leon S, Apostolo-Pereira SL, Araujo YR, Becker J et al. Alternatives for reducing relapse rate when switching from natalizumab to fingolimod in multiple sclerosis. Exp Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2016;9(4). doi:10.1586/17512433.2016.1145053
- 10 Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33(11):1444-52. doi:10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444