Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2008; 47(05): 443-447
DOI: 10.3414/ME0523
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Reliability Assessment of a Plaque Scoring Index Using Photographs

A. Kelly
1   Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
A. G. Antonio
1   Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
L. C. Maia
1   Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
R. R. Luiz
2   Institute of Studies in Public Health (NESC), Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
R. B. C. Vianna
1   Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
L. E. L. P. Quintanilha
3   Department of Dental Clinic, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 11 December 2007

accepted: 21 April 2008

Publication Date:
20 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: The need to evaluate the reliability of a clinical index before using it as a research tool is clearly recognized. Therefore the aim of this study was to evaluate whether a new calibration method by means of photographs would be useful for assessing the examiners’ reliability in the interpretation of a plaque index.

Methods: Nine children were randomly recruited from a public school in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Two trained examiners evaluated these children for dental plaque, in a classroom environment, in order to record plaque scores. The children’s teeth were dyed and colored photographs were taken of all tooth surfaces using a camera, mouth mirrors and lip retractors. The photographs were evaluated to select and identify the best visible tooth surfaces, and the final sample consisted of 343 tooth surfaces. One week after the clinical examination, both examiners scored the tooth surfaces from the photographs according to the index used. The intra and inter-examiner agreements were measured by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for individual mean scores and for tooth surfaces scores.

Results: The data showed an excellent agreement (ICC > 0.80) between clinical and photographic examinations, for both examiners, both for tooth surface and patient analysis. The statistics also demonstrated excellent (ICC > 0.80) inter-examiner agreement on clinical and photographic examinations.

Conclusion: The method seems to be an effective technique to evaluate the reliability of the plaque index, improving the reproducibility of epidemiological studies.

Keywords

Diagnosis of dental plaque - dental plaque index - observer variation - dental photography - reproducibility of results
 

  • References

  • 1 Antonio AG, Kelly A, Valle DD, Vianna RB, Quintanilha LE. Long-term effect of an oral health promotion program for schoolchildren after the interruption of educational activities. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2007; 32: 37-41.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Davies GN. The different requirements of periodontal indices for prevalence studies and clinical trials. Int Den J 1968; 18: 560-569.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Fischman SL. Current status of indices of plaque. J Clin Periodontol 1986; 13: 371-374.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Quigley GA, Hein JW. Comparative cleansing efficiency of manual and power brushing. J Am Dent Assoc 1962; 65: 26-29.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I. Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue vitamin C. J Periodontol 1970; 20: 44-47.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fischman S. Design of studies to evaluate plaque control agents. J Den Res 1979; 58: 2389-2395.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Council on Dental Therapeutics.. Guidelines for acceptance of chemotherapeutic products for the control of supragingival dental plaque and gingivitis. American Dental Association; 1985
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Birkeland JM, Jorkjend L. The influence of examination of the assessment of the intra-examiner error by using the plaque and gingival index systems. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1975; 3: 214-216.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mojon P, Favre P, Chung JP, Budtz-Jorgensen E. Examiner agreement on caries detection and plaque accumulation during dental surveys of elders. Gerodontology 1995; 12: 49-55.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mojon P. Reliability of clinical indices. Student 1999; 3: 57-75.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mojon P, Chung J-P, Favre P, Budtz-Jorgensen E. Examiner agreement on periodontal indices during dental surveys of elders. J Clin Periodontol 1996; 23: 56-59.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Fleiss JL, Shrout PE. The effects of measurement errors on some multivariate procedures. Am J Public Health 1977; 67: 1188-1191.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 WHO.. Oral Health Surveys. Basic Methods. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1977
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Dombret B, Matthijs S, Moradi Sabzevar M. Interexaminer reproducibility of ordinal and intervalscaled plaque indices. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 630-635.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Spolsky VW, Gornbein JA. Comparing measures of reliability for indices of gingivitis and plaque. J Periodontol 1996; 67: 853-859.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Fields HW, Vann WF, Vig KW. Reliability of soft tissue profile analysis in children. Angle Orthod 1982; 52: 159-165.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tedesco LA, Albino JE, Cunat JJ, Green LJ, Lewis EA, Slakter MJ. A dental-facial attractiveness scale. Part I. Reliability and validity. Am J Orthod 1983; 84: 38-43.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Peterson B, Dahlstrom L. Perception of treatment need among orthodontic patients compared with professionals. Acta Odontol Scand 1998; 56: 299-302.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Van Maanen CJ, Zonnenberg AJ, Elvers JW, Oostendorp RA. Intra/interrater reliability of measurements on body posture photographs. Cranio 1996; 14: 326-331. Erratum in: Cranio 1997; 15: 8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lehmann TM, Aach T, Witte H. Sensor, signal, and image informatics – state of the art and current topics. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45: 57-67.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 1979; 86: 420-428.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1973; 33: 613-619.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Poulsen S, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Knudsen AM, Nielsen L, Kelstrup J. Evaluation of two methods of scoring denture plaque. Acta Odontol Scand 1983; 41: 283-286.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Fleiss JL, Chilton NW, Park MH. Inter- and intraexaminer variability in scoring supragingival plaque: II. Statistical Analysis. Pharmacol Therapeut Dent 1980; 5: 5-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hunt RJ. Percent agreement, Pearson’s correlation, and kappa as measures of inter-examiner reliability. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 128-130.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Matthijs S, Moradi Sabzevar M, Adriaens PA. Intra-examiner reproducibility of 4 dental plaque indices. J Clin Periodontol 2001; 28: 250-254.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Dababneh RH, Khouri AT, Smith RG, Addy M. Correlation and examiner agreement between a new method of plaque scoring and a popular established plaque index, modeled in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29: 1107-1111.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Preber H, Ylipaa V, Bergstrom J, Ryden H. A comparative study of plaque removing efficiency using rotary electric and manual toothbrushes. Swed Dent J 1991; 15: 229-234.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Freitas LB, Collaert B, Attstrom R. Effect of the pre-brushing rinse, Plax, on dental plaque formation. J Clin Periodontol 1991; 18: 713-715.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Renton-Harper P, Claydon N, Warren P, Newcombe RG, Addy M. Conversion of plaque-area measurements to plaque index scores. An assessment of variation and discriminatory power. J Clin Periodontol 1999; 26: 429-433.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Soder PO, Jin LJ, Soder B. Computerized planimetric method for clinical plaque measurement. Scand J Dent Res 1993; 101: 21-25.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sagel PA, Lapujade PG, Miller JM, Sunberg RJ. Objective quantification of plaque using digital image analysis. Monogr Oral Sci 2000; 17: 130-143.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Smith RN, Brook AH, Elcock C. The quantification of dental plaque using an image analysis system: reliability and validation. J Clin Periodontol 2001; 28: 1158-1162.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Shaloub A, Addy M. Evaluation of accuracy and variability of scoring-area-based plaque indices. A laboratory model. J Clin Periodontol 2000; 27: 16-21.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Nordstrom NK, Paikoff EL, Uldricks J, Solt C, Burch J, Beck FM. Testing reliability of plaque and gingival indices. Two methods. J Periodontol 1988; 59: 270-273.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar