Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2012; 51(02): 95-103
DOI: 10.3414/ME11-02-0009
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Technology-induced Errors

The Current Use of Frameworks and Models from the Biomedical and Life Sciences Literatures
E. M. Borycki
1   School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
,
A. W. Kushniruk
1   School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
,
P. Bellwood
1   School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
,
J. Brender
2   Department of Health Science and Technology, University of Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received:24 January 2011

accepted:21 August 2011

Publication Date:
19 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: The objective of this paper is to examine the extent, range and scope to which frameworks, models and theories dealing with technology-induced error have arisen in the biomedical and life sciences literature as indexed by Medline®.

Methods: To better understand the state of work in the area of technology-induced error involving frameworks, models and theories, the authors conducted a search of Medline® using selected key words identified from seminal articles in this research area. Articles were reviewed and those pertaining to frameworks, models or theories dealing with technology-induced error were further reviewed by two researchers.

Results: All articles from Medline® from its inception to April of 2011 were searched using the above outlined strategy. 239 citations were returned. Each of the abstracts for the 239 citations were reviewed by two researchers. Eleven articles met the criteria based on abstract review. These 11 articles were downloaded for further in-depth review. The majority of the articles obtained describe frameworks and models with reference to theories developed in other literatures outside of healthcare. The papers were grouped into several areas. It was found that articles drew mainly from three literatures: 1) the human factors literature (including human-computer interaction and cognition), 2) the organizational behavior/socio-technical literature, and 3) the software engineering literature.

Conclusions: A variety of frameworks and models were found in the biomedical and life sciences literatures. These frameworks and models drew upon and extended frameworks, models and theoretical perspectives that have emerged in other literatures. These frameworks and models are informing an emerging line of research in health and biomedical informatics involving technology-induced errors in healthcare.

Keywords

Framework - model - theory - technology-induced error - unintended consequences - e-iatrogenesis - technology facilitated error - human factors - sociotechnical - organizational - software engineering
 

  • References

  • 1 Shortliffe T, Cimino JJ. Biomedical informatics: Computer applications in health care and biomedicine. New York: Springer Verlag; 2006.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Kushniruk AW, Triola MM, Stein B, Borycki EM, Kannry JL. Technology-induced error and usability: The relationship between usability problems and prescription errors when using a handheld application. Int J Med Inform 2005; 74 (07) (08) 519-526.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ammenwerth E, Brender J, Nykänen P, Prokosch H-U. Rigby M, Talmon J. Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems - Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73 (06) 479-491.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Borycki EM, Kushniruk AW. Where do technology-induced errors come from? Towards a model for conceptualizing and diagnosing errors caused by technology. pp 148-166. In Kushniruk AW, Borycki EM. (eds). Human, Social and Organizational Aspects of Health Information Systems. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI global; 2008.
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Kaplan B, Shaw NT. Future directions in evaluation research: People, organizational, and social issues. Meth Inf Med 2004; 43: 215-231.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra RH, Guappone K, Carpenter JD, Seshadri V. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76S: S21-S27.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A. et al Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 2005; 293: 1197-1203.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Weiner JP, Kfuri T, Chan K, Fowles JB. E-Iatrogenesis: The most critical unintended consequence of CPOE and other HIT. JAMIA 2007; 14 (03) 387-389.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 National Library of Medicine. Fact sheet: Medical subject headings (MeSH®). 2011 http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/mesh.html.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Brender J. Medical Informatics: Does the healthcare domain have special features? Letter to the Editor. Meth Inf Med 1997; 36 (01) 59-60.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Shortell SM, Kaluzny AD. Health care management: Organizational design and behaviour (5th ed.). Toronto: Thompson; 2006.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Jackson W, Verberg N. Methods: Doing social research.Toronto: Pearson; 2006.
  • 13 Eason KD. Ergonomic perspectives on advances in human-computer interaction. Ergonomics 1991; 34 (06) 721-741.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Davis D, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2009; 46: 1386-1400.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2005; 8 (01) 19-32.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Edyburn DL. Models, theories and frameworks: Contributions to understanding special education technology. Special Ed Tech Practice 2001; March/April 16-24.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Dictionary Reference.com. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/framework Accessed on 18-04. 2011
    PubMed
  • 18 Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. (4th ed.). Free Press; New York: 1995.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2011; 19: i68-i74.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Reason J. Human error: Models and management. BMJ 2000; 320: 768-770.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Borycki EM, Kushniruk AW, Keay L, Kuo M-H. Framework for identifying where technology-induced errors come from. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 148: 1-187.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Zhang J, Patel VL, Johnson TR, Shortliffe EH. A cognitive taxonomy of medical errors. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2004; 37: 193-204.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Borycki E, Kushniruk A. Identifying and preventing technology-induced errors using simulations: Application of usability engineering techniques. Healthcare Quarterly 2005; 8: 99-105.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Borycki EM, Kushniruk A, Keay E, Nicoll J, Anderson J, Anderson M. Toward an integrated simulation approach for predicting and preventing technology-induced errors in healthcare: implications for healthcare decision-makers. Healthcare Quarterly 2009; 12 Sp 90-96.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 York University. Theories used in IS research: Socio-technical theory. http://www.istheory.yorku.ca/sociotechnicaltheory.htm [Accessed on 17-04-2011]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mumford E. Redesigning human systems. IRM Press 2003
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Berg M, Langenberg C, vd BergI, Kwakkernaat J. Considerations for sociotechnical design: Experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1998; 52 (013) 243-251.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Aarts J, Doorewaard H, Berg MA. Understanding implementation: The case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center. JAMIA 2004; 11 (03) 207-216.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kushniruk A, Beuscart-Zephir M-C. Grzes A, Borycki E, Watbled L, Kannry J. Increasing the safety of healthcare information systems through improved procurement: Toward a framework for selection of safe healthcare systems. Healthcare Quart 2010; 13: 53-58.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Borycki E, Keay E. Methods to assess the safety of health information systems. Healthcare Quart 2010; 13: 47-52.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Borycki EM, Kushniurk AW, Carvalho CJ, Kuo M-H. A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative methods using to identify and study technology-induced errors in computerized physician order entry (CPOE). Asia Pacific Association of Medical Informatics Conference. Nov 22-25 2009
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Bloomrosen M, Starren J., Lorenzi NM. Ash JS, Patel VL, Shortliffe EH. Anticiapting and addressing the unintended consequences of health IT and policy: A report from the AMIA 2009 health policy meeting. JAMIA 2011; 18: 82-90.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Gruding J. Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Scientific American 1991; September 762-774.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kushniruk A, Borycki E, Kuwata S, Kannry J. Predicting changes in workflow resulting from healthcare information systems: Ensuring the safety of healthcare. Healthcare Quart 2006; 98-100. 102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Horsky J, Kaufman D, Oppenheim M, Patel V. Framework for analyzing the cognitive complexity of computer-assisted clinical ordering. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2003; 36: 4-22.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care - An interactive sociotechnical analysis. JAMIA 2007; 14: 542-549.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Leavitt HJ. Applied organizational change in industry: Structural, technological and humanistic approaches. In March JG. editor. Handbook of Organisations. Chicago: Rand MacNally & Co; 1970.
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Brender J. Handbook of Evaluation Methods for Health Informatics. New York: Academic Press; 2006.
    Google Scholar
  • 39 van der Sijs H, van Gelder T, Vulto A, Berg M, Aarts J. Understanding handling of drug safety alerts: A simulation study. International Journal Medical Informatics 2010; 79 (05) 361-369.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Berg M, Aarts J., van der Lei J. ICT in health care: Sociotechnical approaches. 2003; 42: 297-301.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar