Methods Inf Med 2013; 52(02): 128-136
DOI: 10.3414/ME12-01-0044
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Automated Volumes-of-Interest Identification for Classical and Atypical Parkinsonian Syndrome Differentiation Using T2’ MR Imaging

N. D. Forkert
1   Department of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
,
A. Schmidt-Richberg
2   Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Germany
,
A. Treszl
3   Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
,
C. Hilgetag
1   Department of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
,
J. Fiehler
4   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
,
A. Münchau
5   Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany,
,
H. Handels
2   Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Germany
,
K. Boelmans
6   Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 15 May 2012

accepted: 15 February 2012

Publication Date:
24 January 2018 (online)

Zoom Image

Summary

Objectives: In clinical routine, patients with classical Parkinsonian syndromes (CPS) need to be differentiated from those with atypical Parkinsonian syndromes (APS), particularly with respect to prognosis and treatment decision. To date, this diagnosis is mainly based on clinical criteria, leading to failure rates up to 25%, motivating the development of image-based decision support systems. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and in particular T2´ image sequences have been suggested as a potential marker for differential diagnosis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether automatically identified T2´ volumes-of-interest (VOIs) can be used for an automatic differentiation of CPS and APS patients.

Material and Methods: 74 MRI datasets were available for this hypothesis generating trial, including image sequences from 24 healthy subjects, 33 CPS and 17 APS patients. First, a problem-specific reference atlas was generated using the healthy control datasets. Next, patients’ datasets were registered to the atlas. Voxel-wise t-tests, reflecting significance levels of T2´ value differences between CPS and APS patients, were then applied for calculation of a p-map. Finally, the calculated p-map was thresholded and a connected component analysis was performed for final VOI detection. In parallel, manually defined VOIs were determined in grey and white matter for comparison.

Results: Three VOIs in parts of the basal ganglia and the left occipital lobe were automatically identified by the presented method. There was a trend for higher area under the curve on multivariable receiver operating characteristic curves for automatically determined VOIs over manually defined VOIs (0.939 vs. 0.818, p = 0.0572).

Conclusion: The diagnostic role of automatically defined VOIs in differentiation of CPS and APS patients based on T2´ image sequences should be further investigated.