Motor Unit Tracking Using High Density Surface Electromyography (HDsEMG)

Summary

Introduction: This article is part of the Focus Theme of Methods of Information in Medicine on “Biosignal Interpretation: Advanced Methods for Neural Signals and Images”.

Objectives: The study discusses a technique to automatically correct for effects of electrode grid displacement across serial surface EMG measurements with high-density electrode arrays (HDsEMG). The goal is to match motor unit signatures from subsequent measurements and by this, achieve automated motor unit tracking.

Methods: Test recordings of voluntary muscle contractions using HDsEMG were performed on three healthy individuals. Electrode grid displacements were mimicked in repeated recordings while measuring the exact position of the grid. A concept of accounting for translational and rotational displacements by making the projection of the recorded motor unit action potentials is first introduced. Then, this concept was tested for the performed measurements attempting the automated matching of the similar motor unit action potentials across different trials.

Results: The ability to perform automated correction (projection) of the isolated motor unit action potentials was first shown using large angular displacements. Then, for accidental (small) displacements of the recording grid, the ability to automatically track motor units across different measurement trials was shown. It was possible to track 10 –15% of identified motor units.

Conclusions: This proof of concept study demonstrates an automated correction allowing the identification of an increased number of same motor unit action potentials across different measurements. By this, great potential is demonstrated for assisting motor unit tracking studies, indicating that otherwise electrode displacements cannot always be precisely described.

Keywords

Grid displacement - HDsEMG - motor unit tracking - rotation - surface electromyography

• References

• 1 Maathuis EM, Drenthen J, van Dijk J. P, Visser GH, Blok JH. Motor unit tracking with high-density surface EMG. J Electromyogr Kines 2008; 18: 920-930.
• 2 Merletti R, Rainoldi A, Farina D. Surface electromyography for noninvasive characterization of muscle. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2001; 29: 20-25.
• 3 Holobar A. On repeatability of motor unit identification in multi-channel surface electromyograms of the external sphincter muscle. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Electrotechnical and Computer Science Conference ERK 2007. Portorož, Slovenia: 2007
• 4 Lapatki B, van Dijk J, Jonas I, Zwarts M, Stegeman D. A thin, flexible multielectrode grid for high-density surface EMG. J Appl Physiol 2004; 96 (01) 327-336.
• 5 Gligorijeviæ I, De Vos M, Blok JH, Mijoviæ B, van Dijk JP, Van Huffel S. Automated way to obtain motor units’ signatures and estimate their firing patterns during voluntary contractions using HD-sEMG. In: Proceedings of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC ’11) conference. Boston, USA: 2011: 4090-4093.
• 6 Gligorijević I, van Dijk JP, Mijoviæ B, Van Huffel S, Blok JH, De Vos M. A new and fast approach towards sEMG decomposition. Med Biol Eng Comput 2013; 51 (05) 593-605.
• 7 Lapatki BG, Oostenveld R, van Dijk JP, Jonas IE, Zwarts MJ, Stegeman DF. Topographical Characteristics of Motor Units of the Lower Facial Musculature Revealed by Means of High-Density Surface EMG. J Neurophysiol 2006; 95: 342-354.
• 8 Decoste D, Sch lkopf B. Training Invariant Support Vector Machines. Mach Learn 2002; 46: 161-190.
• 9 Blok J, Stegeman D, Van Oosterom A. Three-layer volume conductor model and software package for applications in surface electromyography. Ann Biomed Eng 2002; 30 (04) 566-577.
• 10 Farina D, Merletti R. A novel approach for precise simulation of the EMG signal detected by surface electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2001; 48 (06) 637-646.
• 11 Farina D, Merletti R, Indino B, Graven-Nielsen T. Surface EMG crosstalk evaluated from experimental recordings and simulated signals. Reflections on crosstalk interpretation, quantification and reduction. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43 (01) 30-35.